Radio Paradise

Recently Active Forum Topics:

Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 1260, 1261, 1262 ... 1349, 1350, 1351 Next

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male

Posted: May 26, 2016 - 7:25am
Trump has clinched Republican nomination: AP yippee, we've hit the bottom! Can only get better...oh wait, he might get elected!?

rotekz

rotekz Avatar

Posted: May 26, 2016 - 7:05am

DePaul Protester: "Pick Up Your Trump Sh**, White Male!" bit.ly/20Dav9Z

Marco Rubio: Media Should Report ‘Truth’ About Professional Protesters Disrupting Trump

Sen. Marco Rubio is criticizing the media, urging it to report the truth about violent protests at Donald Trump rallies.
“Hope media will start to report truth, many of the violent protestorsevents are ‘professional protestors,’ not grassroots,” he said on Twitter early this morning.
Rubio added that there was a “whole industry of professional disrupters who go to events to disrupt them knowing cameras will gravitate to them.”
“These protestsnot organic,” he said.
Rubio’s comments are starkly different than his reaction to the protests in Chicago when the Florida senator was still running against Trump for the Republican nomination for president.
“I’m telling you, that this boiling point that we have now reached has been fed largely by the fact that we have a frontrunner in my party who has fed into language that basically justifies physically assaulting people who disagree with you,” Rubio said in a press conference the morning after the riots in Chicago in March.
At that time, Rubio warned the political process was careening towards chaos, and blamed Trump’s angry and bitter rhetoric during his rallies for sparking the violence.
“It’s not just about Chicago, it happened in St. Louis … this has happened repeatedly now, this is not new. This is a pattern,” he said. “You cannot say whatever you want, words have consequences.”

Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male

Posted: May 26, 2016 - 3:51am
rotekz wrote: Nice cherry-picking for that graphic; it seems they ignored the other eight questions. Actually on the majority of issues brought up on that poll, Clinton leads. Still, any poll results of 1,000 people can only be somewhat reliable.

rotekz

rotekz Avatar

Posted: May 26, 2016 - 12:42am

kcar

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 11:50pm
kurtster wrote: And it has to be historic like the last one. This time it has to be a woman. Its the most politically correct thing to do ! Or hey, you could vote the narcissistic blowhard douchebag and help drop the world's respect for us to an all-time low! It's the idiocratic thing to do!

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 10:16pm
KurtfromLaQuinta wrote: I think we need a person who's a professional politician. They are the best qualified. Someone who's in touch with everyday life. This has worked in the past for our benefit. And it has to be historic like the last one. This time it has to be a woman. Its the most politically correct thing to do !

KurtfromLaQuinta

KurtfromLaQuinta Avatar

Location: Really deep in the heart of South California
Gender: Male

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 9:28pm

kcar wrote:

Articles about Trump's net worth:

Trump's net worth isn't relevant to his candidacy. The man is not fit or prepared to be President. We could argue all day about his temperament and character, but the guy hasn't prepared at all for the job. His knowledge base relevant to the job's demands is non-existent and he has a tiny circle of third- or fourth-rate advisors.

I think we need a person who's a professional politician.
They are the best qualified.
Someone who's in touch with everyday life.
This has worked in the past for our benefit.

KurtfromLaQuinta

KurtfromLaQuinta Avatar

Location: Really deep in the heart of South California
Gender: Male

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 9:22pm
kurtster wrote: Funny, I feel the same way about Hillary ... She just sounds so phony to me.

KurtfromLaQuinta

KurtfromLaQuinta Avatar

Location: Really deep in the heart of South California
Gender: Male

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 9:20pm
kcar wrote: Seein' as how Teddy's been resting comfortably for about 100 years, I'll go with Hillary. So your going to throw away your vote just like me.

kcar

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 9:17pm

Articles about Trump's net worth:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/us/politics/donald-trump-money.html

The financial disclosure statement that Trump released to the FEC (which he claimed was the largest ever provided to the Commission and so presumably quite detailed) seems to indicate that is worth might be less than $2 billion:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/18/us/politics/trump-financial-disclosure.html
This last link reports on the feud between Trump and Forbes Magazine over his net worth:

http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/09/29/facts-figures-donald-trumps-real-net-worth-according-to-forbes/

"Donald Trump has said he’s worth $10 billion (or more), but his actual net worth is significantly less than that, according to an analysis by Forbes.

Randall Lane, the editor of the magazine, writes:

“Trump’s valuation this year holds extra importance, of course, due to his audacious second act: his highly unlikely – but no longer inconceivable – path to the presidency. Trump has filed statements claiming he’s worth at least $10 billion or, as he put in a press release, TEN BILLION DOLLARS (capitalization his). After interviewing more than 80 sources and devoting unprecedented resources to valuing a single fortune, we’re going with a figure less than half that – $4.5 billion, albeit still the highest figure we’ve ever had for him.” "

Trump's net worth isn't relevant to his candidacy. The man is not fit or prepared to be President. We could argue all day about his temperament and character, but the guy hasn't prepared at all for the job. His knowledge base relevant to the job's demands is non-existent and he has a tiny circle of third- or fourth-rate advisors.

Lazy8

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 8:47pm

porphyrius wrote:

The man's net worth is around 10 billion. He's the presumptive candidate. Neither one is an argument for whether he's someone you would like, but I think at this point he's probably someone to take seriously.

What was Abraham Lincoln's net worth?

Thomas Jefferson's was probably negative.

Even if his net worth were one of the few things he isn't lying about it wouldn't qualify him to control nuclear launch codes.

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 8:09pm
For a man who was nearly broke at the end of the 80's, he's done pretty well since then for such a stoopid man. Think how much more he could have made if he was smart !

ScottN

ScottN Avatar

Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary
Gender: Male

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 7:58pm

porphyrius wrote:

Not throw a wrench into the monkey works, but......

The man's net worth is around 10 billion. He's the presumptive candidate. Neither one is an argument for whether he's someone you would like, but I think at this point he's probably someone to take seriously.

His net worth is questionable and is only self-declared. Tax returns are undisclosed when their disclosure would embarrass.

He is demonstrably unfit, imo, to be President. Manifest by his history, written as recently as today, in words and actions.

He will deserve serious attention only because he is highly likely to be on the ballot, but not because he is qualified to President.

I think a person's net worth is irrelevant, vs other qualifications/disqualifications, to be taken seriously as POTUS.

R_P

Gender:

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 7:47pm
porphyrius wrote: The man's net worth is around 10 billion. Probably as inflated as his ego, if not more.

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 7:46pm

porphyrius wrote:

Not throw a wrench into the monkey works, but......

The man's net worth is around 10 billion. He's the presumptive candidate. Neither one is an argument for whether he's someone you would like, but I think at this point he's probably someone to take seriously.

No way. He doesn't want to be POTUS. He's just doing this to up his brand, sell books and get Hillary elected. That's what all the wise men have been saying from the start. And most here as well. Nothing to worry about, he's just doing this for fun.

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male

Posted: May 25, 2016 - 7:06pm
ScottN wrote: I am appalled, and very disappointed, that he is taken seriously by too many. Funny, I feel the same way about Hillary ...

Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 1260, 1261, 1262 ... 1349, 1350, 1351 Next