[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Congress - R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 5:53pm
 
Things You Thought Today - kurtster - Jun 22, 2024 - 4:16pm
 
TV shows you watch - Manbird - Jun 22, 2024 - 3:54pm
 
Prog Rockers Anonymous - thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 3:34pm
 
Song of the Day - thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 3:32pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - triskele - Jun 22, 2024 - 3:20pm
 
What do you snack on? - thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 3:20pm
 
Joe Biden - R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 2:44pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - Jun 22, 2024 - 2:44pm
 
What did you have for dinner? - triskele - Jun 22, 2024 - 2:31pm
 
Jam! (why should a song stop) - thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 1:53pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Jun 22, 2024 - 1:46pm
 
June 2024 Photo Theme - Eyes - fractalv - Jun 22, 2024 - 1:46pm
 
Things I Saw Today... - R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 1:38pm
 
Trump - kcar - Jun 22, 2024 - 12:41pm
 
NYTimes Connections - geoff_morphini - Jun 22, 2024 - 12:11pm
 
NY Times Strands - geoff_morphini - Jun 22, 2024 - 12:09pm
 
Wordle - daily game - ptooey - Jun 22, 2024 - 12:06pm
 
Some bands or songs are recurring too much in Rock channe... - mlebihan29 - Jun 22, 2024 - 9:26am
 
Fox Spews - R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 9:19am
 
Israel - R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 8:14am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jun 22, 2024 - 7:13am
 
Sonos - thatslongformud - Jun 22, 2024 - 6:18am
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Jun 22, 2024 - 4:44am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - thisbody - Jun 21, 2024 - 4:26pm
 
Too much classic rock lately? - thisbody - Jun 21, 2024 - 4:01pm
 
Girls Just Want to Have Fun - oldviolin - Jun 21, 2024 - 2:22pm
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Jun 21, 2024 - 12:26pm
 
2024 Elections! - R_P - Jun 21, 2024 - 12:20pm
 
Electronic Music - Manbird - Jun 21, 2024 - 12:14pm
 
LeftWingNutZ - Steely_D - Jun 21, 2024 - 8:07am
 
The Obituary Page - ColdMiser - Jun 21, 2024 - 7:56am
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - Jun 20, 2024 - 6:39pm
 
Basketball - GeneP59 - Jun 20, 2024 - 4:53pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Antigone - Jun 20, 2024 - 4:04pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Jun 20, 2024 - 2:10pm
 
Shall We Dance? - Steely_D - Jun 20, 2024 - 1:18pm
 
Predictions - oldviolin - Jun 20, 2024 - 11:18am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Jun 20, 2024 - 11:10am
 
Ukraine - R_P - Jun 20, 2024 - 10:41am
 
Just Wrong - ColdMiser - Jun 20, 2024 - 7:43am
 
Pink Floyd Set? - Coaxial - Jun 20, 2024 - 5:46am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - heinlein2302 - Jun 20, 2024 - 2:46am
 
Whatever happened to Taco Wagon? - Coaxial - Jun 19, 2024 - 6:14pm
 
favorite love songs - oldviolin - Jun 19, 2024 - 3:09pm
 
Outstanding Covers - pope183 - Jun 19, 2024 - 2:50pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jun 19, 2024 - 12:34pm
 
SCOTUS - ColdMiser - Jun 19, 2024 - 7:15am
 
20+ year listeners? - islander - Jun 18, 2024 - 7:41pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - rgio - Jun 18, 2024 - 5:02pm
 
Other Medical Stuff - miamizsun - Jun 18, 2024 - 2:35pm
 
Hello from Greece! - miamizsun - Jun 18, 2024 - 2:35pm
 
Europe - R_P - Jun 18, 2024 - 9:33am
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 16, 2024 - 8:57pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Manbird - Jun 16, 2024 - 2:39pm
 
Geomorphology - kurtster - Jun 16, 2024 - 1:29pm
 
Artificial Intelligence - thisbody - Jun 16, 2024 - 10:53am
 
The Chomsky / Zinn Reader - thisbody - Jun 16, 2024 - 10:42am
 
Football, soccer, futbol, calcio... - thisbody - Jun 16, 2024 - 8:35am
 
No stream after station ID - arlen.nelson969 - Jun 15, 2024 - 2:29pm
 
Business as Usual - kurtster - Jun 15, 2024 - 9:53am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Antigone - Jun 14, 2024 - 7:04pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - Jun 14, 2024 - 3:15pm
 
China - R_P - Jun 14, 2024 - 2:59pm
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - Jun 14, 2024 - 2:08pm
 
Religion - Steely_D - Jun 14, 2024 - 1:28pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Jun 14, 2024 - 8:56am
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - Proclivities - Jun 14, 2024 - 6:42am
 
Florida - R_P - Jun 13, 2024 - 3:35pm
 
Democratic Party - thisbody - Jun 13, 2024 - 9:08am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - thisbody - Jun 13, 2024 - 8:56am
 
Animal Resistance - thisbody - Jun 13, 2024 - 8:04am
 
New Music - lievendegrauwe - Jun 13, 2024 - 12:43am
 
The Green Thread: A place to share info about living a gr... - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 12, 2024 - 11:48pm
 
Derplahoma! - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 12, 2024 - 9:29pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Two sexes or ? Gender as a non-binary concept Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: May 16, 2023 - 12:55pm


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 30, 2023 - 12:46pm


Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 30, 2023 - 9:30am

The media/nation is on a roll trying to always partition people into a group, for some reason. Instant labelling.
Are they white/black/etc?
Are they male/female/etc?
Are they Christian/Jewish/etc?
Are they Democrat/Republican/etc?

And - tongue in cheek - it reminds me of Randy Newman so that I wonder when news reports will start subdividing people based on height. "Was the killer a short person?" Because we all hate someone, for some characteristic, so we might as well focus on some other one as an identification of horribleness while we're in the groove.


Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Mar 29, 2023 - 4:17pm

 R_P wrote:

indeed
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 29, 2023 - 3:21pm

The Right's Fixation on the Gender Identity of the Nashville Killer Is Disgusting—and Telling
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 28, 2023 - 11:52am


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 5, 2023 - 11:05am

No obfuscation. Straight up zero-sum MAGA!

Jiggz



Posted: Apr 12, 2021 - 1:55am

 miamizsun wrote:

a couple of coffee thoughts

sort of an irony in this head line (i'm not sure if editors had anything to do with it)

bruni has complained about gays being stereotyped, then stereotypes republicans (to be fair he puts something like a caveat in there)

are there politicians pandering or trying to make hay from this? i'd say so, but lgbt issues have been huge losers for those opposing them

brink lindsey writes about it and how the religious right (and left) have been stream-rolled in the last ten years or so on what once was a lynchpin issue

another important point that probably isn't getting enough attention is the issue of children coerced into transitioning and are trying de-transition now at a later age

peeps can google that see that this is a real issue (and that it is causing a lot of grief and hardship)

who is responsible or liable for these somewhat irreversible procedures? when are children responsible for making a life changing decision like gender/sex reassignment?

and then realize that it is a mistake? is that cruel?

definitely a slippery slope, the intuitive answer is to let children come of age and then let them decide to have surgeries and hormone therapies, etc.

we do this already with other lifestyle decisions

i'd hope that political leaders could have some sort of rational conversation around this, but the intentional idiotic polarization rules the day

unfortunately we're at a point where the government wants to use its force to ban or mandate things what would normally be nuanced issues

because radical politics

100% agree.....damn, if it isn't italics its bold.....
kids can't drive a car, can't drink in a pub, supposedly can't have sex...but can make an absolutely life-changing decision like transitioning when they don't even know who they are yet.

The lawsuits are beginning and will inevitably mount up.....people suing for being allowed to make the decision to do this when they didn't know better and now find they are not only no happier but usually a lot more unhappy and that a mistake has been made.

The world has gone bonkers!

Because radical politics, as you say.

Peace to you too....
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 11, 2021 - 12:30pm

 R_P wrote:
I thought lifestyle was more of a fashion thing, but it keeps popping up in the strangest contexts: "I don't hate the gays, I just don't like the lifestyle." Seems to be used in lieu of identity in order to trivialize.

maybe try this:

don't hate or harm anyone and someone's lifestyle or decisions how they want to live their lives is their own business

no harm no foul

peace
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 11, 2021 - 10:00am

 miamizsun has concerns too:
children coerced (will someone plllleeeaaaazzzz)

slippery slope (always. inevitably leads to bestiality or worse)

lifestyle decisions (see below)

government wants to use force (uh-uh)


I thought lifestyle was more of a fashion thing, but it keeps popping up in the strangest contexts: "I don't hate the gays, I just don't like the lifestyle." Seems to be used in lieu of identity in order to trivialize.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 11, 2021 - 6:47am

 R_P wrote:
a couple of coffee thoughts

sort of an irony in this head line (i'm not sure if editors had anything to do with it)

bruni has complained about gays being stereotyped, then stereotypes republicans (to be fair he puts something like a caveat in there)

are there politicians pandering or trying to make hay from this? i'd say so, but lgbt issues have been huge losers for those opposing them

brink lindsey writes about it and how the religious right (and left) have been stream-rolled in the last ten years or so on what once was a lynchpin issue

another important point that probably isn't getting enough attention is the issue of children coerced into transitioning and are trying de-transition now at a later age

peeps can google that see that this is a real issue (and that it is causing a lot of grief and hardship)

who is responsible or liable for these somewhat irreversible procedures? when are children responsible for making a life changing decision like gender/sex reassignment?

and then realize that it is a mistake? is that cruel?

definitely a slippery slope, the intuitive answer is to let children come of age and then let them decide to have surgeries and hormone therapies, etc.

we do this already with other lifestyle decisions

i'd hope that political leaders could have some sort of rational conversation around this, but the intentional idiotic polarization rules the day

unfortunately we're at a point where the government wants to use its force to ban or mandate things what would normally be nuanced issues

because radical politics
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 10, 2021 - 7:19pm

Republicans Have Found Their Cruel New Culture War
triskele

triskele Avatar

Location: The Dragons' Roost


Posted: Dec 3, 2019 - 6:42pm

 R_P wrote:
 
Cool!  Thanks for posting this.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 15, 2019 - 5:17pm


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2019 - 6:34am

 islander wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
 islander wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
 islander wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
I am glad the ludicrous nature of gay conversion therapy was brought up in another thread.
Correlates to my struggle with transgenders and surgery. Firstly, I
have a very strong belief that we should all have the freedom to express
who we are and be proud of it. It is a core value of individualism and
what makes us all unique. Our opinions on LGBQT and Hetero people are
absolutely moot, we are what we are and must learn to exist and co exist
with each other as we were born. Which is why I am against hormone
therapy and plastic surgery to alter one's gender if they do not
identify as such. If you are a man who identifies as a woman, be that.
Dress how you want to dress, talk how you want to talk, you just be
you. Same goes for a woman who identifies as a man, be that. Just
because medical technology allows for you to artificially change
genders, does it mean you should? Not to mention the moral obligations
that are mostly not met for obvious reasons for future love interest and
whether one divulges their birth gender or not. Just as you should not
attempt to change your sexuality, why is it ok to change your gender?
And why is it not ok to change your identity and cultural appropriate
for all other examples except gender? Rachel Dolenz got in a lot of
trouble for passing as black, Elizabeth Warren as Native American and so
forth. People are intentionally blinding themselves because they
identify as being blind, they are also purposely amputating limbs for
the same reason (these things have happened, look them up). Why can't
we just all be happy with who we are and live it?
And conversely we have the same responsibility to accept others as they are. 

In other words be true to yourself.
 Anyway, that is where I have finally landed on that and feel quite comfortable with it.


 

Extra emphasis on the I.  I'm glad that you are finally comfortable with your position. But let me just summarize the lead in paragraph:  "Be who you want to be as long as you don't do anything that sirdoseph is uncomfortable with and he will accept you as you are".    I'm not really comfortable that you are able to reconcile all that. 
 
This is my opinion and you not being comfortable with mine is yours. This does not bother me in the slightest.  I hope this does not make you too uncomfortable because you opinion has an extremely low chance as in nil of affecting mine in any way.  So in essence if my opinion does bother you....."You're gonna have a hard time!"{#Lol} 

And likewise, your level of comfort with anyone else's gender identity, sexual identity, or relationship with their doctor/surgeon/psychologist/milkman/music teacher/metermaid/butcher has little meaning to those people.  So be true to your 'rugged individualist' self and don't try to influence policy or opinion that impacts their ability to just be. 
 

Oh I am fully aware of this and never indicated that my opinion was anything but that, but it is mine.  I wonder if you have the same level of self awareness.

{#Think} 

 

I'm fully aware of my many hypocrisies. But not really relevant as you're the one who started the morning posting a bit about 'everyone should be who I think they should be'.   
 
I believe I said everyone should be who they are, but you are free to interpret any way you like.  My sleep pattern will remain the same either way.{#Sleep}
islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2019 - 6:27am



 sirdroseph wrote:
 islander wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
 islander wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
I am glad the ludicrous nature of gay conversion therapy was brought up in another thread.
Correlates to my struggle with transgenders and surgery. Firstly, I
have a very strong belief that we should all have the freedom to express
who we are and be proud of it. It is a core value of individualism and
what makes us all unique. Our opinions on LGBQT and Hetero people are
absolutely moot, we are what we are and must learn to exist and co exist
with each other as we were born. Which is why I am against hormone
therapy and plastic surgery to alter one's gender if they do not
identify as such. If you are a man who identifies as a woman, be that.
Dress how you want to dress, talk how you want to talk, you just be
you. Same goes for a woman who identifies as a man, be that. Just
because medical technology allows for you to artificially change
genders, does it mean you should? Not to mention the moral obligations
that are mostly not met for obvious reasons for future love interest and
whether one divulges their birth gender or not. Just as you should not
attempt to change your sexuality, why is it ok to change your gender?
And why is it not ok to change your identity and cultural appropriate
for all other examples except gender? Rachel Dolenz got in a lot of
trouble for passing as black, Elizabeth Warren as Native American and so
forth. People are intentionally blinding themselves because they
identify as being blind, they are also purposely amputating limbs for
the same reason (these things have happened, look them up). Why can't
we just all be happy with who we are and live it?
And conversely we have the same responsibility to accept others as they are. 

In other words be true to yourself.
 Anyway, that is where I have finally landed on that and feel quite comfortable with it.


 

Extra emphasis on the I.  I'm glad that you are finally comfortable with your position. But let me just summarize the lead in paragraph:  "Be who you want to be as long as you don't do anything that sirdoseph is uncomfortable with and he will accept you as you are".    I'm not really comfortable that you are able to reconcile all that. 
 
This is my opinion and you not being comfortable with mine is yours. This does not bother me in the slightest.  I hope this does not make you too uncomfortable because you opinion has an extremely low chance as in nil of affecting mine in any way.  So in essence if my opinion does bother you....."You're gonna have a hard time!"
{#Lol}
 

And likewise, your level of comfort with anyone else's gender identity, sexual identity, or relationship with their doctor/surgeon/psychologist/milkman/music teacher/metermaid/butcher has little meaning to those people.  So be true to your 'rugged individualist' self and don't try to influence policy or opinion that impacts their ability to just be. 
 

Oh I am fully aware of this and never indicated that my opinion was anything but that, but it is mine.  I wonder if you have the same level of self awareness.

{#Think}
 

 

I'm fully aware of my many hypocrisies. But not really relevant as you're the one who started the morning posting a bit about 'everyone should be who I think they should be'.   
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2019 - 6:03am

 islander wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
 islander wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
I am glad the ludicrous nature of gay conversion therapy was brought up in another thread.
Correlates to my struggle with transgenders and surgery. Firstly, I
have a very strong belief that we should all have the freedom to express
who we are and be proud of it. It is a core value of individualism and
what makes us all unique. Our opinions on LGBQT and Hetero people are
absolutely moot, we are what we are and must learn to exist and co exist
with each other as we were born. Which is why I am against hormone
therapy and plastic surgery to alter one's gender if they do not
identify as such. If you are a man who identifies as a woman, be that.
Dress how you want to dress, talk how you want to talk, you just be
you. Same goes for a woman who identifies as a man, be that. Just
because medical technology allows for you to artificially change
genders, does it mean you should? Not to mention the moral obligations
that are mostly not met for obvious reasons for future love interest and
whether one divulges their birth gender or not. Just as you should not
attempt to change your sexuality, why is it ok to change your gender?
And why is it not ok to change your identity and cultural appropriate
for all other examples except gender? Rachel Dolenz got in a lot of
trouble for passing as black, Elizabeth Warren as Native American and so
forth. People are intentionally blinding themselves because they
identify as being blind, they are also purposely amputating limbs for
the same reason (these things have happened, look them up). Why can't
we just all be happy with who we are and live it?
And conversely we have the same responsibility to accept others as they are. 

In other words be true to yourself.
 Anyway, that is where I have finally landed on that and feel quite comfortable with it.


 

Extra emphasis on the I.  I'm glad that you are finally comfortable with your position. But let me just summarize the lead in paragraph:  "Be who you want to be as long as you don't do anything that sirdoseph is uncomfortable with and he will accept you as you are".    I'm not really comfortable that you are able to reconcile all that. 
 
This is my opinion and you not being comfortable with mine is yours. This does not bother me in the slightest.  I hope this does not make you too uncomfortable because you opinion has an extremely low chance as in nil of affecting mine in any way.  So in essence if my opinion does bother you....."You're gonna have a hard time!"{#Lol} 

And likewise, your level of comfort with anyone else's gender identity, sexual identity, or relationship with their doctor/surgeon/psychologist/milkman/music teacher/metermaid/butcher has little meaning to those people.  So be true to your 'rugged individualist' self and don't try to influence policy or opinion that impacts their ability to just be. 

 

Oh I am fully aware of this and never indicated that my opinion was anything but that, but it is mine.  I wonder if you have the same level of self awareness.{#Think} 

islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2019 - 5:55am



 sirdroseph wrote:
 islander wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
I am glad the ludicrous nature of gay conversion therapy was brought up in another thread.
Correlates to my struggle with transgenders and surgery. Firstly, I
have a very strong belief that we should all have the freedom to express
who we are and be proud of it. It is a core value of individualism and
what makes us all unique. Our opinions on LGBQT and Hetero people are
absolutely moot, we are what we are and must learn to exist and co exist
with each other as we were born. Which is why I am against hormone
therapy and plastic surgery to alter one's gender if they do not
identify as such. If you are a man who identifies as a woman, be that.
Dress how you want to dress, talk how you want to talk, you just be
you. Same goes for a woman who identifies as a man, be that. Just
because medical technology allows for you to artificially change
genders, does it mean you should? Not to mention the moral obligations
that are mostly not met for obvious reasons for future love interest and
whether one divulges their birth gender or not. Just as you should not
attempt to change your sexuality, why is it ok to change your gender?
And why is it not ok to change your identity and cultural appropriate
for all other examples except gender? Rachel Dolenz got in a lot of
trouble for passing as black, Elizabeth Warren as Native American and so
forth. People are intentionally blinding themselves because they
identify as being blind, they are also purposely amputating limbs for
the same reason (these things have happened, look them up). Why can't
we just all be happy with who we are and live it?
And conversely we have the same responsibility to accept others as they are. 

In other words be true to yourself.
 Anyway, that is where I have finally landed on that and feel quite comfortable with it.


 

Extra emphasis on the I.  I'm glad that you are finally comfortable with your position. But let me just summarize the lead in paragraph:  "Be who you want to be as long as you don't do anything that sirdoseph is uncomfortable with and he will accept you as you are".    I'm not really comfortable that you are able to reconcile all that. 
 
This is my opinion and you not being comfortable with mine is yours. This does not bother me in the slightest.  I hope this does not make you too uncomfortable because you opinion has an extremely low chance as in nil of affecting mine in any way.  So in essence if my opinion does bother you....."You're gonna have a hard time!"
{#Lol}
 

And likewise, your level of comfort with anyone else's gender identity, sexual identity, or relationship with their doctor/surgeon/psychologist/milkman/music teacher/metermaid/butcher has little meaning to those people.  So be true to your 'rugged individualist' self and don't try to influence policy or opinion that impacts their ability to just be. 


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2019 - 5:50am

 islander wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
I am glad the ludicrous nature of gay conversion therapy was brought up in another thread.
Correlates to my struggle with transgenders and surgery. Firstly, I
have a very strong belief that we should all have the freedom to express
who we are and be proud of it. It is a core value of individualism and
what makes us all unique. Our opinions on LGBQT and Hetero people are
absolutely moot, we are what we are and must learn to exist and co exist
with each other as we were born. Which is why I am against hormone
therapy and plastic surgery to alter one's gender if they do not
identify as such. If you are a man who identifies as a woman, be that.
Dress how you want to dress, talk how you want to talk, you just be
you. Same goes for a woman who identifies as a man, be that. Just
because medical technology allows for you to artificially change
genders, does it mean you should? Not to mention the moral obligations
that are mostly not met for obvious reasons for future love interest and
whether one divulges their birth gender or not. Just as you should not
attempt to change your sexuality, why is it ok to change your gender?
And why is it not ok to change your identity and cultural appropriate
for all other examples except gender? Rachel Dolenz got in a lot of
trouble for passing as black, Elizabeth Warren as Native American and so
forth. People are intentionally blinding themselves because they
identify as being blind, they are also purposely amputating limbs for
the same reason (these things have happened, look them up). Why can't
we just all be happy with who we are and live it?
And conversely we have the same responsibility to accept others as they are. 

In other words be true to yourself.
 Anyway, that is where I have finally landed on that and feel quite comfortable with it.


 

Extra emphasis on the I.  I'm glad that you are finally comfortable with your position. But let me just summarize the lead in paragraph:  "Be who you want to be as long as you don't do anything that sirdoseph is uncomfortable with and he will accept you as you are".    I'm not really comfortable that you are able to reconcile all that. 

 
This is my opinion and you not being comfortable with mine is yours. This does not bother me in the slightest.  I hope this does not make you too uncomfortable because you opinion has an extremely low chance as in nil of affecting mine in any way.  So in essence if my opinion does bother you....."You're gonna have a bad time!"{#Lol}

 

 

islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2019 - 5:45am



 sirdroseph wrote:
I am glad the ludicrous nature of gay conversion therapy was brought up in another thread.
Correlates to my struggle with transgenders and surgery. Firstly, I
have a very strong belief that we should all have the freedom to express
who we are and be proud of it. It is a core value of individualism and
what makes us all unique. Our opinions on LGBQT and Hetero people are
absolutely moot, we are what we are and must learn to exist and co exist
with each other as we were born. Which is why I am against hormone
therapy and plastic surgery to alter one's gender if they do not
identify as such. If you are a man who identifies as a woman, be that.
Dress how you want to dress, talk how you want to talk, you just be
you. Same goes for a woman who identifies as a man, be that. Just
because medical technology allows for you to artificially change
genders, does it mean you should? Not to mention the moral obligations
that are mostly not met for obvious reasons for future love interest and
whether one divulges their birth gender or not. Just as you should not
attempt to change your sexuality, why is it ok to change your gender?
And why is it not ok to change your identity and cultural appropriate
for all other examples except gender? Rachel Dolenz got in a lot of
trouble for passing as black, Elizabeth Warren as Native American and so
forth. People are intentionally blinding themselves because they
identify as being blind, they are also purposely amputating limbs for
the same reason (these things have happened, look them up). Why can't
we just all be happy with who we are and live it?
And conversely we have the same responsibility to accept others as they are. 

In other words be true to yourself.


 Anyway, that is where I have finally landed on that and feel quite comfortable with it.




 

Extra emphasis on the I.  I'm glad that you are finally comfortable with your position. But let me just summarize the lead in paragraph:  "Be who you want to be as long as you don't do anything that sirdoseph is uncomfortable with and he will accept you as you are".    I'm not really comfortable that you are able to reconcile all that. 
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next