R_P wrote:
Obama did not look forward.  He looked up because it was a good place to drop bombs on other people.

 Steely_D wrote:
Good point.

 westslope wrote:

It's not the suits that are the problem - it's the US legal structure that the suited guys/gals take advantage of.

 westslope wrote:
They're very forward-looking people (never mind that, let's move on to the next existential threat!)

 Steely_D wrote:
There are lots of guys in suits in other rich western democracies.

 westslope wrote:

It exemplifies how the US court system can be disrupted by guys in suits.

In many countries in the world, Trump would already be in jail.

The fact that he is not in jail, does that say something about the modern USA?

- The importance attached to Men of Great Stature and the 'exceptional' treatment accorded such men (and often such women)?

- Or just how weak the US social contract currently is?

- Or is ripping up the deal with Iran and moving the US embassy to Jerusalem worthy of cutting this great leader significant slack? 

 Steely_D wrote:
Scum.

 Steely_D wrote:

Always a class act.

 Steely_D wrote:

Babe Ruth, Ty Cobb and so on...

Trump posts picture of himself wielding baseball bat next to Alvin Bragg’s head

 Beaker wrote:

Damn right!

westslope... you want something legible?

Go f*ck yourself!

Why are ya all getting your knickers in a twist about Stormy Daniels (hey).. 

 but isn't there a MUCH bigger tax evasion case here than just the illegal deduction of hush money involved?
Trump's accountant is already doing time for it.

 westslope wrote:

You're ridiculous.  You demand info be handed to you, per your own specifications, and on a silver platter, where after you will reject it anyway.

I'd suggest you consult Google, or for even perhaps smarter insight, try ChatGPT - it's the new iPhone, y'know.  And no, we're not going to provide you with instructions on how to use either tool.

 kurtster wrote:
Come on kurtster.  Look at the annoying background.  Does that make reading easier?  Seriously now.  

 kurtster wrote:

Well no, because that's the prosecutor's job and they haven't filed the charges yet.

 westslope wrote: 
Huh, say what ?  

I think the letter speaks clearly about the current prosecutor's key witness and the apparent charges he is attempting to prosecute.

By the way, for clarity can anyone here in favor of this prosecution, and there are many, explain just what the charges are and how they make any sense and justify the indictment, arrest and prosecution of Trump ?  Asking for a friend ...

 Beaker wrote:
That is not designed to be read by intelligent people.

Thanks but I will pass.

 westslope wrote:

Here you go.

 Beaker wrote:

What  does this mean?

Any possibility of using words?