[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Radio Paradise Comments - lily34 - Dec 1, 2023 - 5:15am
 
Wordle - daily game - Proclivities - Dec 1, 2023 - 5:11am
 
What Puts You In the Christmas Mood? - miamizsun - Dec 1, 2023 - 4:50am
 
Buddy's Haven - miamizsun - Dec 1, 2023 - 4:47am
 
As California Goes, So Goes The Rest Of The Country - kurtster - Dec 1, 2023 - 4:33am
 
Other Medical Stuff - kurtster - Dec 1, 2023 - 3:04am
 
Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - Dec 1, 2023 - 2:50am
 
NYTimes Connections - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Dec 1, 2023 - 2:26am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Nov 30, 2023 - 8:17pm
 
November 2023 Photo Theme - Perspective - fractalv - Nov 30, 2023 - 7:30pm
 
OUR CATS!! - Red_Dragon - Nov 30, 2023 - 6:11pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Antigone - Nov 30, 2023 - 5:12pm
 
RightWingNutZ - kcar - Nov 30, 2023 - 4:50pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 30, 2023 - 4:44pm
 
Israel - R_P - Nov 30, 2023 - 2:09pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - DrLex - Nov 30, 2023 - 2:00pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - Steely_D - Nov 30, 2023 - 12:56pm
 
JFK Assassination - kurtster - Nov 30, 2023 - 12:46pm
 
Pogues! - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 30, 2023 - 11:45am
 
Live Music - steeler - Nov 30, 2023 - 11:38am
 
The Obituary Page - kcar - Nov 30, 2023 - 11:33am
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Nov 30, 2023 - 10:51am
 
Name My Band - GeneP59 - Nov 30, 2023 - 10:43am
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Nov 30, 2023 - 10:37am
 
FLAC stream crashes Sonos - fbloemhof - Nov 30, 2023 - 10:32am
 
If not RP, what are you listening to right now? - kurtster - Nov 30, 2023 - 10:28am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - rgio - Nov 29, 2023 - 3:38pm
 
Download Manager IPhone problems - RPnate1 - Nov 29, 2023 - 11:31am
 
RP On Windows Media Player? - William - Nov 29, 2023 - 10:00am
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - lily34 - Nov 29, 2023 - 8:44am
 
2024 Elections! - black321 - Nov 29, 2023 - 7:42am
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Nov 28, 2023 - 5:41pm
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Nov 28, 2023 - 3:48pm
 
Animal Resistance - lily34 - Nov 28, 2023 - 9:59am
 
Trump - kcar - Nov 28, 2023 - 9:09am
 
The Dragons' Roost - GeneP59 - Nov 28, 2023 - 8:59am
 
Economix - black321 - Nov 28, 2023 - 7:38am
 
NY Times Spelling Bee - lily34 - Nov 28, 2023 - 6:48am
 
New mix, what would you like to see ? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 28, 2023 - 6:27am
 
Tech - what makes RP sound so good? - William - Nov 27, 2023 - 5:37pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Nov 27, 2023 - 1:32pm
 
New Music - oldviolin - Nov 27, 2023 - 11:52am
 
Questions. - miamizsun - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:37am
 
♥ ♥ ♥ Vote For Pie ♥ ♥ ♥ - miamizsun - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:36am
 
iPad wake screen - michaelmuller - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:11am
 
the Todd Rundgren topic - Coaxial - Nov 27, 2023 - 9:36am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Nov 27, 2023 - 7:46am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Nov 26, 2023 - 8:25pm
 
Happy Thanksgiving! - Bill_J - Nov 26, 2023 - 5:58pm
 
Audio Problems - uaerez - Nov 26, 2023 - 12:30pm
 
Shameless Band Promotion - West Coast Division - sunybuny - Nov 26, 2023 - 11:56am
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Nov 26, 2023 - 10:45am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Nov 26, 2023 - 9:54am
 
AI Bill - timothy_john - Nov 26, 2023 - 3:52am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 25, 2023 - 8:07pm
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - thisbody - Nov 25, 2023 - 6:36pm
 
Discussion Thread for the Meetup Meetup Topic - Red_Dragon - Nov 25, 2023 - 2:02pm
 
Europe - thisbody - Nov 25, 2023 - 1:08pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Nov 25, 2023 - 12:00pm
 
Germany - thisbody - Nov 24, 2023 - 12:29pm
 
Ukraine - Steely_D - Nov 23, 2023 - 1:20pm
 
Artificial Intelligence - thisbody - Nov 23, 2023 - 9:28am
 
It's the economy stupid. - thisbody - Nov 23, 2023 - 9:17am
 
Tech & Science - thisbody - Nov 23, 2023 - 9:08am
 
Arlo Guthrie's Alice's Restaurant Massacree - islander - Nov 23, 2023 - 7:51am
 
Coffee - haresfur - Nov 22, 2023 - 7:53pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Nov 22, 2023 - 2:08pm
 
Climate Change - thisbody - Nov 22, 2023 - 1:53pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Nov 22, 2023 - 12:26pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Nov 22, 2023 - 12:23pm
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - oldviolin - Nov 22, 2023 - 11:09am
 
Movie Recommendation - thisbody - Nov 22, 2023 - 10:28am
 
Art Show - oldviolin - Nov 21, 2023 - 10:06pm
 
Outstanding Covers - oldviolin - Nov 21, 2023 - 9:55pm
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - Beez - Nov 21, 2023 - 6:36am
 
Index » Regional/Local » Europe » Ukraine Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 86, 87, 88 ... 103, 104, 105  Next
Post to this Topic
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 8:44pm

 steeler wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

more from Friedman's article:

I am going to share Kennan’s whole answer:
“I think it (NATO expansion) is the beginning of a new cold war. I think the Russians will gradually react quite adversely and it will affect their policies. I think it is a tragic mistake. There was no reason for this whatsoever. No one was threatening anybody else. This expansion would make the founding fathers of this country turn over in their graves.
“We have signed up to protect a whole series of countries, even though we have neither the resources nor the intention to do so in any serious way.was simply a lighthearted action by a Senate that has no real interest in foreign affairs. What bothers me is how superficial and ill informed the whole Senate debate was. I was particularly bothered by the references to Russia as a country dying to attack Western Europe.
“Don’t people understand? Our differences in the Cold War were with the Soviet Communist regime. And now we are turning our backs on the very people who mounted the greatest bloodless revolution in history to remove that Soviet regime. And Russia’s democracy is as far advanced, if not farther, as any of these countries we’ve just signed up to defend from Russia. Of course there is going to be a bad reaction from Russia, and thenwill say that we always told you that is how the Russians are — but this is just wrong.”
It’s EXACTLY what has happened.
 

Good article. Friedman always is good. As to what he says here: Yes, but we are where we are now.
 
Agreed. And it would be wrong to think the NATO expansion was the only factor in the rise of the oligarchs. There was a lot of confusion, chaos and disarray in Russia post 1991. 
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 8:37pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

more from Friedman's article:

I am going to share Kennan’s whole answer:
“I think it (NATO expansion) is the beginning of a new cold war. I think the Russians will gradually react quite adversely and it will affect their policies. I think it is a tragic mistake. There was no reason for this whatsoever. No one was threatening anybody else. This expansion would make the founding fathers of this country turn over in their graves.
“We have signed up to protect a whole series of countries, even though we have neither the resources nor the intention to do so in any serious way. was simply a lighthearted action by a Senate that has no real interest in foreign affairs. What bothers me is how superficial and ill informed the whole Senate debate was. I was particularly bothered by the references to Russia as a country dying to attack Western Europe.
“Don’t people understand? Our differences in the Cold War were with the Soviet Communist regime. And now we are turning our backs on the very people who mounted the greatest bloodless revolution in history to remove that Soviet regime. And Russia’s democracy is as far advanced, if not farther, as any of these countries we’ve just signed up to defend from Russia. Of course there is going to be a bad reaction from Russia, and then will say that we always told you that is how the Russians are — but this is just wrong.”
It’s EXACTLY what has happened.
 

Good article. Friedman always is good.

As to what he says here: Yes, but we are where we are now.

And I am not so sure Putin would not have tried to keep the “Soviet sphere” intact — and beholden to Russia — even if NATO had not expanded to take in some of those countries.



NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 8:22pm

more from Friedman's article:

I am going to share Kennan’s whole answer:
“I think it (NATO expansion) is the beginning of a new cold war. I think the Russians will gradually react quite adversely and it will affect their policies. I think it is a tragic mistake. There was no reason for this whatsoever. No one was threatening anybody else. This expansion would make the founding fathers of this country turn over in their graves.
“We have signed up to protect a whole series of countries, even though we have neither the resources nor the intention to do so in any serious way. [NATO expansion] was simply a lighthearted action by a Senate that has no real interest in foreign affairs. What bothers me is how superficial and ill informed the whole Senate debate was. I was particularly bothered by the references to Russia as a country dying to attack Western Europe.
“Don’t people understand? Our differences in the Cold War were with the Soviet Communist regime. And now we are turning our backs on the very people who mounted the greatest bloodless revolution in history to remove that Soviet regime. And Russia’s democracy is as far advanced, if not farther, as any of these countries we’ve just signed up to defend from Russia. Of course there is going to be a bad reaction from Russia, and then [the NATO expanders] will say that we always told you that is how the Russians are — but this is just wrong.”
It’s EXACTLY what has happened.
 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 8:18pm

 Ivanhoe wrote:

Say who? - You?
 
Funnily enough, yes. It's me saying that.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 8:17pm

 R_P wrote: 
From the article:
Putin is basically saying to Ukrainians (more of whom want to join the European Union than NATO): “You fell in love with the wrong guy. You will not run off with either NATO or the E.U. And if I have to club your government to death and drag you back home, I will.”
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 8:15pm

 haresfur wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Kind of interesting reading Putin's article about the Ukraine.


Fixed
 
{#Wink} times like that I show my age.  
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 5:56pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Kind of interesting reading Putin's article about the Ukraine.



Fixed

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 2:54pm

This Is Putin’s War. But America and NATO Aren’t Innocent Bystanders. (Friedman, NYT)
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 10:56am

Kind of interesting reading Putin's article about the Ukraine.

not without some heavy irony in it:
Radicals and neo-Nazis were open and more and more insolent about their ambitions. They were indulged by both the official authorities and local oligarchs, who robbed the people of Ukraine and kept their stolen money in Western banks, ready to sell their motherland for the sake of preserving their capital. To this should be added the persistent weakness of state institutions and the position of a willing hostage to someone else's geopolitical will.

EDIT: btw, as far as I know,  which is not much admittedly, he's not wrong about the close cultural ties between Russia and Ukraine and their shared history. Putin's problem as I see it, is that he can't divorce his own quasi-dictatorship of Russia from the country and people of Russia itself, in a l'etat est moi kind of way. The people of the Ukraine, Belarus and even of Russia itself want to move on.

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 9:49am

Putin's R2P...
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 6:52am

 GeneP59 wrote:

Once KBG always KGB. You can never leave the family until you die.

Remarkable how a KGB operative can go from a good party member with nothing to becoming a Millionaire.
And the alleged offing of his wife so he doesn’t have any close family to be held over his head.

Its the Napoleonic complex raising it head once again.
I do not trust little man with beady little eyes and itty bitty little thingy.
( Say this with fake Russian accent) 
{#Roflol}

err billionaire-

Navalny has a strong twitter thread


GeneP59

GeneP59 Avatar

Location: On the edge of tomorrow looking back at yesterday.
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 6:49am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
wow, guess who hasn't moved on from his communist past: In his speech, Putin condemned Ukraine’s decision to move on from its Soviet past, painting the de-facto partition as his punishment. “Modern Ukraine was wholly and fully created by Bolshevik, communist Russia,” he said. “You want decommunisation? That suits us fine. But don’t stop halfway. We’re ready to show Ukraine what real decommunisation means for it.”
 
Once KBG always KGB. You can never leave the family until you die.

Remarkable how a KGB operative can go from a good party member with nothing to becoming a Millionaire.
And the alleged offing of his wife so he doesn’t have any close family to be held over his head.

Its the Napoleonic complex raising it head once again.
I do not trust little man with beady little eyes and itty bitty little thingy.
( Say this with fake Russian accent) {#Roflol}
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 5:48am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

wow, guess who hasn't moved on from his communist past:

In his speech, Putin condemned Ukraine’s decision to move on from its Soviet past, painting the de-facto partition as his punishment. “Modern Ukraine was wholly and fully created by Bolshevik, communist Russia,” he said. “You want decommunisation? That suits us fine. But don’t stop halfway. We’re ready to show Ukraine what real decommunisation means for it.”



expansionist reunification!
people can call it what they want but it's a predictable violent variant from an egotistic authoritarian tzar-like troll
and we know this by politically sequencing putin's operating system? 
is he trying to put the band back together again?  
wrong any way we slice it
just invasion by another name

History and Etymology for invasion

Middle English invasioun "assault, attack," borrowed from Anglo-French invasion, envasioun, borrowed from Late Latin invāsiōn-, invāsiō "attack, taking possession by violence," from Latin invādere "to enter with hostile intent, assault, attack" + -tiōn-, -tiō, suffix of verbal action — more at INVADE




NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 21, 2022 - 9:42pm

wow, guess who hasn't moved on from his communist past:

In his speech, Putin condemned Ukraine’s decision to move on from its Soviet past, painting the de-facto partition as his punishment. “Modern Ukraine was wholly and fully created by Bolshevik, communist Russia,” he said. “You want decommunisation? That suits us fine. But don’t stop halfway. We’re ready to show Ukraine what real decommunisation means for it.”
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Feb 21, 2022 - 9:31pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Well it was already clear that NATO was not going to come to the defense of Ukraine, should Putin invade.

On the other hand, this land grab actually plays into NATO hands, giving it the excuse to bolster its defences and arm the Baltic nations including Poland and give economic support to Ukraine, which is going to need it. I think we can assume Nordstrom2 is now dead. The Ukrainian pipeline is going to be interesting - will Russia will cut it off in retaliation? but that would deprive it of further export revenue.. 


It seems Ukraine is in the unenviable position of being a geopolitical football.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 21, 2022 - 9:25pm

 steeler wrote:

I do agree he is testing the push-back and calculating. He might stop — for now — with that part of Donbas. If he is allowed to effectively annex those sectors, what does that say about the allies and their support for Ukraine? How much of Ukraine will Putin be allowed to siphon off? First Crimea, then Luhansk and Donetsk. 


Well it was already clear that NATO was not going to come to the defense of Ukraine, should Putin invade.

On the other hand, this land grab actually plays into NATO hands, giving it the excuse to bolster its defences and arm the Baltic nations including Poland and give economic support to Ukraine, which is going to need it. I think we can assume Nordstrom2 is now dead. The Ukrainian pipeline is going to be interesting - will Russia will cut it off in retaliation? but that would deprive it of further export revenue.. 

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Feb 21, 2022 - 9:16pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


sure, but he's also testing how much push-back he is going to encounter. Both the Crimea and now Luhansk and Donetsk are areas with a Russian ethnic majority. Ukraine itself doesn't have a Russian majority, sees itself as a distinct region with a long history (albeit many family and historical ties to Russia). That is a wholly different prospect.
Not that I am condoning the annexation of the separatist regions. One shouldn't forget the genocide of the Crimean cossacks as being one factor in the ethnic cleansing that led to the current Russian ethnic majority there.

But I think he's going to stop there, at least for the moment. Let the dust settle. Work on getting the sanctions removed over time. Then let's see. I could be badly wrong of course.

I do agree he is testing the push-back and calculating. He might stop — for now — with that part of Donbas. If he is allowed to effectively annex those sectors, what does that say about the allies and their support for Ukraine? How much of Ukraine will Putin be allowed to siphon off? First Crimea, then Luhansk and Donetsk. 

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 21, 2022 - 8:49pm

 steeler wrote:


It seems fairly obvious that Putin wants to regain as much of the former Soviet sphere as he can. He has said as much in explaining his view of Russia’s relationship with Ukraine. 

Russia’s invasion and annexation of Crimea in 2014 sometimes gets lost in these discussions.



sure, but he's also testing how much push-back he is going to encounter. Both the Crimea and now Luhansk and Donetsk are areas with a Russian ethnic majority. Ukraine itself doesn't have a Russian majority, sees itself as a distinct region with a long history (albeit many family and historical ties to Russia). That is a wholly different prospect.
Not that I am condoning the annexation of the separatist regions. One shouldn't forget the genocide of the Crimean cossacks as being one factor in the ethnic cleansing that led to the current Russian ethnic majority there.

But I think he's going to stop there, at least for the moment. Let the dust settle. Work on getting the sanctions removed over time. Then let's see. I could be badly wrong of course.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Feb 21, 2022 - 8:37pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

um, can we move away from the 1960's diction here?  Structures evolve over time. The relationship between Europe and NATO is definitely a two-way thing, with both the EU and the USA benefitting from the arrangement. The US managed to keep its military hegemony, but Europe could pretend it didn't need to become a military power and concentrate on installing political unification, which has prevented war and allowed unprecedented economic progress. 

To call this US imperialism misses the point. Europe can look back on 75 years of peace and prosperity. Long may it continue, if you ask me. The other pesky fact about the jingoistic use of "US imperialism" is that if it is solely imperialism that the US is pursuing, they are doing it pretty badly, allowing a far greater economic power (China) to arise that is increasingly in a position to threaten its hegemony. 

No, it's not imperialism per se that drives the US. It is an almost naive belief in the power of free markets to bring about democratic revolutions in other countries, as though free markets alone would create replicas of US values all over the world. I guess you could call that cultural imperialism but it is a pretty soft use of the word. Particularly in light of the fact that its not happening as planned.

IMO the US lost its way by hitching the enlightenment values enshrined in its founding documents to purely business interests. With that it lost both its credibility and made some pretty dumb foreign policy decisions, putting money and trade above values.



It seems fairly obvious that Putin wants to regain as much of the former Soviet sphere as he can. He has said as much in explaining his view of Russia’s relationship with Ukraine. 

Russia’s invasion and annexation of Crimea in 2014 sometimes gets lost in these discussions.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 21, 2022 - 8:18pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:


I still think he's concerned about NATO expansion to the East, and why shouldn't he be? NATO was an organization that should have been defunct with the end of The Cold War, instead it has been used to justify the expansion of American Imperialism to Russia's doorstep.

um, can we move away from the 1960's diction here?  Structures evolve over time. The relationship between Europe and NATO is definitely a two-way thing, with both the EU and the USA benefitting from the arrangement. The US managed to keep its military hegemony, but Europe could pretend it didn't need to become a military power and concentrate on installing political unification, which has prevented war and allowed unprecedented economic progress. 

To call this US imperialism misses the point. Europe can look back on 75 years of peace and prosperity. Long may it continue, if you ask me. The other pesky fact about the jingoistic use of "US imperialism" is that if it is solely imperialism that the US is pursuing, they are doing it pretty badly, allowing a far greater economic power (China) to arise that is increasingly in a position to threaten its hegemony. 

No, it's not imperialism per se that drives the US. It is an almost naive belief in the power of free markets to bring about democratic revolutions in other countries, as though free markets alone would create replicas of US values all over the world. I guess you could call that cultural imperialism but it is a pretty soft use of the word. Particularly in light of the fact that its not happening as planned.

IMO the US lost its way by hitching the enlightenment values enshrined in its founding documents to purely business interests. With that it lost both its credibility and made some pretty dumb foreign policy decisions, putting money and trade above values.


PS, as I see it, this last point is one of the major factors in the moral vacuity that has now befallen the US itself and is hollowing it out from within.

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 86, 87, 88 ... 103, 104, 105  Next