Proclivities wrote: 
Yes, it shows them in the story at the link...

 DaveInVA wrote: 
That was a cool car.  Didn't they have the six round tail lights from '60 to about '68?

 DaveInVA wrote: 
Wow. Always found that car butt-ugly but it's nice to see one in that kinda shape.

Watch A 28.5L Fiat Start For The First Time In A Century And Be Afraid

How about a "NEW" 63 Impala? 

 haresfur wrote: 
I don't know. It looks like there is a center split on both the front and the back windows. In addition to the structural element, it moves the awkward blind spot from the corner to dead center in front! Safety and style!  The only thing missing is a way to get in, but really, you would just want this thing built around you - 'cause once you're in, you'll never want to leave!

 oldviolin wrote: 

 haresfur wrote: 
I KNOW! It's awesome...

 Red_Dragon wrote: 
That looks great.  I bet there's no structural integrity in the roof and you really don't want to roll it, though.

 Red_Dragon wrote: 
Dang.  That's surprisingly cool, actually.  Of course, I kind of have a weakness for wagons.

 Coaxial wrote: 
Alexandra wrote:  

It will be okay, it's just that the time has come to force the issue. We had hoped to make it on her terms in the spring. But recent circumstances have changed the schedule. It's the best option of bad choices. 

 islander wrote: 
Play nice!

Hope it all goes smoothly.

 islander wrote: 
 
Aw jeez. Sorry to hear it. I wish you all the best and a smooth transition for her. As much as it can be, anyway.

 Alexandra wrote: 
Unfortunately no. The islander mom-in-law is still having issues and it looks like this may wind up being crisis intervention week. This is not going to be fun.

 islander wrote: 
 
Right. Just went back and checked the originator of the thread....
 
 
It still annoys me. Especially as it keeps getting bumped these days.
 
 
 
Hey, any chance of seeing you and your Beloved next weekend?

 Coaxial wrote: 
I may have spotted my problem - Islander's rule #143 - Thou shalt co-opt any rogue or spamish thread for our own humorous purposes with haste.

And then there is that whole guideline set about threadjacking - mainly: we do it.  

 Alexandra wrote: 
I thought this one should be for interesting/odd car related things and the other specifically for cars that we really want. RD's last post really should be in the other thread. But then people around here have obviously not read Islander's strict rules for thread relevancy compliance.

 Alexandra wrote: 
The thread looks like spam that was never cleaned up.

The title of this thread truly annoys me...I suppose because it looks like "text speak." How I wish people would go back to using this one.