[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Wordle - daily game - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 15, 2024 - 9:11pm
 
NY Times Strands - maryte - Apr 15, 2024 - 8:22pm
 
NYTimes Connections - maryte - Apr 15, 2024 - 8:17pm
 
Ukraine - kurtster - Apr 15, 2024 - 7:49pm
 
TV shows you watch - Manbird - Apr 15, 2024 - 7:28pm
 
Trump - Manbird - Apr 15, 2024 - 7:24pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - Manbird - Apr 15, 2024 - 7:17pm
 
Israel - R_P - Apr 15, 2024 - 6:24pm
 
WTF??!! - haresfur - Apr 15, 2024 - 6:24pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Apr 15, 2024 - 2:06pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Beez - Apr 15, 2024 - 1:36pm
 
Republican Party - Isabeau - Apr 15, 2024 - 12:12pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Apr 15, 2024 - 9:00am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Apr 15, 2024 - 5:31am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - kurtster - Apr 15, 2024 - 1:10am
 
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 14, 2024 - 8:55pm
 
Earthquake - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 14, 2024 - 4:16pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Apr 14, 2024 - 12:36pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:59am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - thisbody - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:27am
 
Synchronization - ReggieDXB - Apr 13, 2024 - 11:40pm
 
Other Medical Stuff - geoff_morphini - Apr 13, 2024 - 7:54am
 
What Did You See Today? - Steely_D - Apr 13, 2024 - 6:42am
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:50pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:05pm
 
It's the economy stupid. - Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 10:17am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:49am
 
Poetry Forum - oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:45am
 
Dear Bill - oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:16am
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Apr 12, 2024 - 1:04am
 
Radio Paradise in Foobar2000 - gvajda - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:53pm
 
The Obituary Page - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 11, 2024 - 2:33pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Apr 11, 2024 - 8:29am
 
Joe Biden - black321 - Apr 11, 2024 - 7:43am
 
New Song Submissions system - MayBaby - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:29am
 
No TuneIn Stream Lately - kurtster - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:26pm
 
Caching to Apple watch quit working - email-muri.0z - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:25pm
 
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse - Alchemist - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:52am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - orrinc - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:48am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - GeneP59 - Apr 10, 2024 - 8:15am
 
NPR Listeners: Is There Liberal Bias In Its Reporting? - black321 - Apr 9, 2024 - 2:11pm
 
Sonos - rnstory - Apr 9, 2024 - 10:43am
 
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet - gvajda - Apr 9, 2024 - 9:55am
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 8, 2024 - 2:08pm
 
If not RP, what are you listening to right now? - kurtster - Apr 8, 2024 - 10:34am
 
And the good news is.... - thisbody - Apr 8, 2024 - 3:57am
 
How do I get songs into My Favorites - Huey - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:29pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Apr 7, 2024 - 5:14pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - Isabeau - Apr 7, 2024 - 12:50pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:18am
 
Why is Mellow mix192kbps? - dean2.athome - Apr 7, 2024 - 1:11am
 
Musky Mythology - haresfur - Apr 6, 2024 - 7:11pm
 
China - R_P - Apr 6, 2024 - 11:19am
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - oldviolin - Apr 6, 2024 - 10:00am
 
Artificial Intelligence - R_P - Apr 5, 2024 - 12:45pm
 
Vega4 - Bullets - nirgivon - Apr 5, 2024 - 11:50am
 
Europe - thisbody - Apr 5, 2024 - 10:09am
 
Environment - thisbody - Apr 5, 2024 - 9:37am
 
How's the weather? - geoff_morphini - Apr 5, 2024 - 8:37am
 
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands) - Babylon - Apr 5, 2024 - 8:37am
 
share song - dkraybil - Apr 5, 2024 - 8:37am
 
Love & Hate - miamizsun - Apr 5, 2024 - 5:37am
 
iOS borked - RPnate1 - Apr 4, 2024 - 2:13pm
 
Won't Load Full Page - Just Music (Canada) - RPnate1 - Apr 4, 2024 - 2:13pm
 
Playlist Unwieldy - darrenthackeray - Apr 4, 2024 - 12:09pm
 
Please Don't Post Here - GeneP59 - Apr 4, 2024 - 7:20am
 
Breaking News - thisbody - Apr 4, 2024 - 6:46am
 
Outstanding Covers - islander - Apr 3, 2024 - 4:23pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - Red_Dragon - Apr 3, 2024 - 3:54pm
 
Russia - black321 - Apr 3, 2024 - 12:57pm
 
Fascism In America - Red_Dragon - Apr 3, 2024 - 8:39am
 
Democratic Party - kurtster - Apr 3, 2024 - 2:16am
 
Horses for Courses - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 2, 2024 - 9:41pm
 
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 2, 2024 - 4:31pm
 
Agenda driven Radio 2050 - R_P - Apr 2, 2024 - 1:23pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » As California Goes, So Goes The Rest Of The Country Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next
Post to this Topic
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:47am

 JrzyTmata wrote:

our regular stores do. Even CVS has a program when using a reusable bag.
I would guess most do, you might have to ask.
 
I never shop at those stores, so it doesn't matter.

JrzyTmata

JrzyTmata Avatar



Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:44am

 hippiechick wrote:

Whole Foods does. Trader Joes gives you a raffle ticket. The regular stores do not give you anything.
 
our regular stores do. Even CVS has a program when using a reusable bag.
I would guess most do, you might have to ask.

hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:42am

 JrzyTmata wrote:

Every supermarket I ever shopped gives you a 5¢ discount per bag when you bring your own.
 
Whole Foods does. Trader Joes gives you a raffle ticket. The regular stores do not give you anything.

JrzyTmata

JrzyTmata Avatar



Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:40am

 hippiechick wrote:

If people want to used grocery bags, they should have to pay 10c for each one. That would help curtail the use. We always take our own bags to the store.
 
Every supermarket I ever shopped gives you a 5¢ discount per bag when you bring your own.

oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 7:56am

If people want to use plastic grocery bags they should get .10 off for each one they bring back to the store for credit (with limits of course)
and the store get credit from the cart manufacturer that melts them down to make new wheels, which won't go bonka bonka bonka...
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 7:50am

 oldslabsides wrote:


"Los Angeles just enacted a ban on plastic grocery bags. That put three or four manufacturers out of business,'' Stone, a pharmacist from Temecula, said.

wow.  there's some priorities for ya.  hey, Stone, let's bring back the manufacture of DDT, I'm sure that'll provide lots of jobs for your new state.  idiot.



 
If people want to used grocery bags, they should have to pay 10c for each one. That would help curtail the use. We always take our own bags to the store.

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 7:04am

 kurtster wrote:


A new twist on a very old idea.  As a native born and raised there, this has been an ongoing debate ever since I can remember and that's back to the 50's.

Back in the 60's and before, California was a very conservative state, Western style, and saw Southern California draining the resources of the the North including water, timber and energy and mostly tax revenue.  It was the North that wanted to ditch the South.  The South was busy trying to irrigate an unihabitable desert and build highways that the tax base down there could not provide for. 

Southern California is more dependent on foreign water than anything else.  As a kid in the 60's, it was breaking news when the Colorado River actually made it all the way to the Gulf of California.  It usually was diverted so much that it never made it to the Gulf.  To understand the west, one must look at the history of water and water rights.

Now the San Joaquin Valley has been dried up by Easterners because of a stupid little fish and put thousands out of work and driven up the price of food in the process unnecessarily.

Freaking Yankees screw up everything, everywhere.  Carpetbaggers. 

 

"Los Angeles just enacted a ban on plastic grocery bags. That put three or four manufacturers out of business,'' Stone, a pharmacist from Temecula, said.

wow.  there's some priorities for ya.  hey, Stone, let's bring back the manufacture of DDT, I'm sure that'll provide lots of jobs for your new state.  idiot.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 6:58am

 hippiechick wrote: 

A new twist on a very old idea.  As a native born and raised there, this has been an ongoing debate ever since I can remember and that's back to the 50's.

Back in the 60's and before, California was a very conservative state, Western style, and saw Southern California draining the resources of the the North including water, timber and energy and mostly tax revenue.  It was the North that wanted to ditch the South.  The South was busy trying to irrigate an unihabitable desert and build highways that the tax base down there could not provide for. 

Southern California is more dependent on foreign water than anything else.  As a kid in the 60's, it was breaking news when the Colorado River actually made it all the way to the Gulf of California.  It usually was diverted so much that it never made it to the Gulf.  To understand the west, one must look at the history of water and water rights.

Now the San Joaquin Valley has been dried up by Easterners because of a stupid little fish and put thousands out of work and driven up the price of food in the process unnecessarily.

Freaking Yankees screw up everything, everywhere.  Carpetbaggers. 
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 6:35am

'South California' proposed as 51st state by Republican supervisor


samiyam

samiyam Avatar

Location: Moving North


Posted: Jun 25, 2010 - 7:31am

 hippiechick wrote:

debt
 


hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jun 25, 2010 - 7:15am

 donna_birichina wrote:
And then there's this:

California license plates could soon carry advertising


A new proposed bill in California would put digital advertisements on vehicle license plates to help pull the cash-strapped state out of dept.

 
debt

donna_birichina

donna_birichina Avatar

Location: in the middle
Gender: Female


Posted: Jun 25, 2010 - 7:14am

And then there's this:

California license plates could soon carry advertising


A new proposed bill in California would put digital advertisements on vehicle license plates to help pull the cash-strapped state out of dept.
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 25, 2010 - 5:17am

 kurtster wrote:

How ironic you made that statement in this thread.  In California, gas prices did in fact rise several years ago directly because overall consumption went down because of economizing.  The state had to raise the taxes on gas because of falling tax revenue due to falling consumption.  Therefore, the base price of gas went up.  We still have fluctuations, but the minimum price did go up.

Another example lies in Charlotte, North Carolina, where the municipal water district had to raise prices because of conservation, again because usuge went down so much, they could no longer cover fixed expenses without a price increase.
 
That is ironic.  I was not aware of that taking place in California - so I stand (or sit, actually) corrected.  I believe the main reason for the Charlotte increases was based on drought conditions - which did reduce consumption, but the (often mandatory) conservation was spurred by reduced supply - which will increase prices.  Anyhow, thanks for pointing out those examples.
{#Cheers}

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 5:31pm

 Proclivities wrote:

I agree with some of your points (especially the "data-collecting" question), but the argument that "if we use less they'll charge more" is unsubstantiated and frequently used as an alarmist ploy.  That was a major talking point of supply-side types who, over 30 years ago, opposed regulations for higher automobile fuel-efficiency.  Gasoline prices did not rise when (or because) more people started driving fuel-efficient, compact cars.  For one thing, that theory contradicts the sacred Capitalist principle of supply-and-demand.
Though assuming energy providers are "principled" may be a stretch.
 
How ironic you made that statement in this thread.  In California, gas prices did in fact rise several years ago directly because overall consumption went down because of economizing.  The state had to raise the taxes on gas because of falling tax revenue due to falling consumption.  Therefore, the base price of gas went up.  We still have fluctuations, but the minimum price did go up.

Another example lies in Charlotte, North Carolina, where the municipal water district had to raise prices because of conservation, again because usuge went down so much, they could no longer cover fixed expenses without a price increase.

Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 4:33pm

 miamizsun wrote:

One of the "unintended consequences" will be fluctuating (variable) rates, which will allow them to increase the price during peak usage.

I think as we use less, or become more efficient, they may charge us more, which would cancel out any savings to the end user, but potentially boost profits for providers.

These meters will allow very specific two way monitoring, which would allow them to charge for specific appliances/activities if they choose.

I understand the angle of well connected corporations using their government "buddies" to gouge us, nothing new there.

What bothers me is where do they think they get the right to do any of this?

Politicians and bureaucrats collecting data (spying) to what end?

Government intervention in markets always causes problems.

Regards
 
I agree with some of your points (especially the "data-collecting" question), but the argument that "if we use less they'll charge more" is unsubstantiated and frequently used as an alarmist ploy.  That was a major talking point of supply-side types who, over 30 years ago, opposed regulations for higher automobile fuel-efficiency.  Gasoline prices did not rise when (or because) more people started driving fuel-efficient, compact cars.  For one thing, that theory contradicts the sacred Capitalist principle of supply-and-demand.
Though assuming energy providers are "principled" may be a stretch.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 4:16pm

 dmax wrote:

I was offered the choice a year or so ago, but my wife vetoed the idea that, on power hungry days when it's likely that we'll need the AC, it would be possible for PG&E to throttle our use.

 
One of the "unintended consequences" will be fluctuating (variable) rates, which will allow them to increase the price during peak usage.

I think as we use less, or become more efficient, they may charge us more, which would cancel out any savings to the end user, but potentially boost profits for providers.

These meters will allow very specific two way monitoring, which would allow them to charge for specific appliances/activities if they choose.

I understand the angle of well connected corporations using their government "buddies" to gouge us, nothing new there.

What bothers me is where do they think they get the right to do any of this?

Politicians and bureaucrats collecting data (spying) to what end?

Government intervention in markets always causes problems.

Regards

(former member)

(former member) Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 3:55pm

 kurtster wrote:


OBTW, does anyone still call PG&E, pigs, goats and elephants anymore ?  I remember that from days gone by.
 
Heh. Never heard that!
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 3:51pm

 dmax wrote:

I was offered the choice a year or so ago, but my wife vetoed the idea that, on power hungry days when it's likely that we'll need the AC, it would be possible for PG&E to throttle our use.

 
Glad to hear participation is voluntary, I wasn't sure.  My concerns would be more relevant if it was mandatory.

OBTW, does anyone still call PG&E, pigs, goats and elephants anymore ?  I remember that from days gone by.

(former member)

(former member) Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 3:45pm

 kurtster wrote:

I may be wrong, but there is no choice involved with participation as I understand it.  And the smart grid will overide your thermostat settings, if someone decides that your settings are inapropriate.
 
I was offered the choice a year or so ago, but my wife vetoed the idea that, on power hungry days when it's likely that we'll need the AC, it would be possible for PG&E to throttle our use.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 3:24pm

California welfare cards can be used in many casino ATMs

Times review finds that in more than half of the state's casinos and gaming rooms, welfare recipients can get cash from state-issued EBT cards.


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next