Listener-supported — Commercial-free
Comments (37)add comment
Ok vocal, but this version ignored the classic guitar rif. So what's the point.
This completely blows.
I understand Bill's affinity for covers, but this one is inexcusable. Why'd they bother to record it when it's so high on the suckometer?
I understand Bill's affinity for covers, but this one is inexcusable. Why'd they bother to record it when it's so high on the suckometer?
Great version - ignoring the naysayers!
No.
If it was a different or interesting version then I may be more accepting.
this is just someone else doing it their way.
If it was a different or interesting version then I may be more accepting.
this is just someone else doing it their way.
Wrong.
NON !
Touche pas au grisbi sal....
Touche pas au grisbi sal....
ShamanManu wrote:
ditto
no
ditto
Um. Hm. Um... M.
Nay.
Nay.
no
I tried to listen to this and wish i am not here
Trying to make a Pink Floyd cover it's a useless gesture and truly reveals your limitations as an artist. Simply because you cannot make it better or at least interesting. Period.
No f-in' way.
Going to do a cover? Add something. Shouldn't be less than the original. I had to turn down the volume until it was over.
I love this!
An 8 out of the gate.
A little self-indulgent in a few places. Altogether, a very nice cover. If I was Mr. Pink and Ms. Floyd, i would be very proud.
-Erik
An 8 out of the gate.
A little self-indulgent in a few places. Altogether, a very nice cover. If I was Mr. Pink and Ms. Floyd, i would be very proud.
-Erik
Awesome cover. In fact this whole album is terrific. They have recently displaced PT as my new favorite band... and that took quite some doing.
What a beautiful rendition of this song.
I think I have to puke.....
Kilroy wrote:
..Why not ?
Why?
..Why not ?
Much as I love this song and the covers that different artists have made, this particular one just doesn't do much for me. Not bad, but not great either.
I'm not denying that this is pretty good, but there are some songs that simply don't need covering.
I likey
Andy_B wrote:
Precisely.
Despite what's been said in the previous negative posts, this IS awfully GOOD! Pink Floyd would be proud. An 8 from this old PF believer.
Precisely.
Despite what's been said in the previous negative posts, this IS awfully GOOD! Pink Floyd would be proud. An 8 from this old PF believer.
This cover song has a lot of feel to it... love it...
I'm confused.
Man's voice?
Vacuous models?
Covering a classic, intelligent tune?
Somebody help!
Man's voice?
Vacuous models?
Covering a classic, intelligent tune?
Somebody help!
ploba wrote:
Because it's 7:00 according to the clock? ;-)
it gets a 7 for the album artwork :)
Because it's 7:00 according to the clock? ;-)
Not completely understanding the need to 'cover' this...but I like the song and I like CW...so I suppose it's not too bad.
Kilroy wrote:
Exactly.
Why?
Exactly.
the harmonica playing nailed it. Nice!!!
Leave it to PF
I like the cover art. Can't say the same for the cover song.
Who allowed this to happen?
it gets a 7 for the album artwork :)
Why?
Agreed--this isn't terrible, but there's a reason groups like R.E.M., Yes and/or Pink Floyd shouldn't have their songs covered. Their sound was so unique it just DOES NOT WORK!