Man: Obama threat for apocalyptic attention

My my, aren't you quite the stalker.  You've made notes on every wee little thing that I ever did that might have annoyed you.

edit: reader's note - see this excerpt from Beaker's Greatest Hits  /edit :winkything:

Yes, I know you've been angling for my attention for a long, long while — obviously e-jealous of the affections I shower on some here.  But I see right through you.  You're not looking for discussion - you're here just to brawl.  Sorry dude - that's not me, and never was.

Just so you don't go away disappointed yet again, and since you mentioned LGF, here's a link to yet another inflammatory article over at that notorious hate site:

We Got Mail!

The "notes" have resided in that storage device called "the human brain".  I'm just barely touching the low points, too. 

The Beaker technique is to use a wide array of techniques to  harass, hound, annoy, and savage other RPeeps until they yawp.  They subsequently cool down;  there's a period of psychological/emotional retraction as the anger subsides.  Beaker swoops in with a showy display of outrage and demands for abject apology.

It's cruel sport with RP members, it's disgusting, and I won't remain silent about it, barrage of abuse or not. I don't want your notice.  I do want RP forum members to notice what you're doing to the forum. 

And I really don't care if you assist grandmothers across the street at night in arctic conditions in Saskatoon;  all I can see is what goes on here in this forum.

Your "Beaker's Greatest Hits" link merely confirms what I'm saying.  For those who actually take the trouble to follow it, they can easily scroll back a dozen posts and see how it developed.  I didn't level a singe ad-hominem at you, nor did I play games with your handle, "beaker".  I was responding to a link you provided criticizing Tim Geither which featuring the keen insights "A $100 billion mistake!" and "Idjit".  As if you're not here for a brawl.

I kept up with your responses, and it was all going reasonably civilly - nobody in their right mind would call it stalking.  You responded by applying the insulting name of "bantha fodder" to me - an assault that was completely unjustified.  You did nothing to support your contention that Geithner didn't know what he was talking about but instead posted a silly page of links to year-old posts from me - do I have anything to do with Geithner? 

You'll also notice that I did not initially respond to the provocation by a mangle of my own, and only after you repeatedly resorted to insolent name calling did I respond in kind.  That was a mistake - I should have contacted Bill G, and given him one more hassle to confront in what must be a world of hassles. 

I think you're counting on me being pissed off and flustered by a revisit to the insolence.  Why else would you provide a link that very clearly shows how you initiated a puerile bout of name calling?