Yes and both can be true at the same time. I don't hate anyone here, and I'm always up for a good debate. I disagree, but do not hate. Donald Trump HAS been convicted of Rape and several Felonies and Fox News has been convicted of spreading falsehoods about Voter Machines. There's no hate in stating the truth. Some people would rather shoot the messenger than admit they don't like the message.
Debate in nuclear-armed former colony fails to reassure global community
The televised face-off between the leading candidates for US president amplified widespread concerns over the state of democracy in the troubled North American nation.
Held in the relatively stable northeastern state of Pennsylvania on the eve of the 23rd anniversary of the countryâs worst terrorist attack, the debate was a chance to showcase the democratic progress the country had made since the violent, shambolic elections and attempted coup nearly four years ago.
Federal judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the Nunes v. CNN suit on February 19, 2021.<6>
The second and third links you provide seem to be related to the same case.
Apparently you're not troubled, Kurt, by Fox's prolonged broadcasting of complete lies about the 2020 election. As you've pointed out, other news networks have had their own failings but the scope, duration and depth and Fox's lies about the 2020 election, esp. the Dominion and Smartmatic machines should stagger you.
But you seem to believe that everyone's lying, so you'll believe the liars who best cater to your fears and needs.
Don't let Fluffy outside, Kurt!
That's the kind of talking sense that got you on permanent ignore. Thank you and keep posting so I can better understand the batshit crazy being posted.
Go back and really re-read my responses. You appear to have some reading comprehension issues. I never said anything about your dog post and I didnât call you a racist either. I just said donât be surprised if others think you are because you are doing your damndest to support and make excuses for one.
Even if Biden was still the candidate (seems both you and Trump need to be reminded he is not), he would still clearly be more qualified than a racist, hate mongering, Constitution crushing, vendetta pursuing, woman molesting, lying felon.
Tell me Kurt what fuels your dreams these days? That Trump wins the election and you can land a job as a bus driver to help round up all of these insane, cat & dog eating criminal illegal immigrants that are raping all of our women and causing crime at levels never seen before? You want to be on the front lines of the million plus illegal human roundup and hey if other brown skinned legal immigrants get swept up in the mix that wouldnât be such a bad thing after all. Right?
NOW THAT'S *MAGA* RUDE (or MEGA) /
...unter der Gürtellinie, wie von allen Seiten üblich...
today's sad state of affairs, when capitalism's readying itself to digest us all
Federal judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the Nunes v. CNN suit on February 19, 2021.<6>
The second and third links you provide seem to be related to the same case.
Apparently you're not troubled, Kurt, by Fox's prolonged broadcasting of complete lies about the 2020 election. As you've pointed out, other news networks have had their own failings but the scope, duration and depth and Fox's lies about the 2020 election, esp. the Dominion and Smartmatic machines should stagger you.
But you seem to believe that everyone's lying, so you'll believe the liars who best cater to your fears and needs.
Just because you aren't aware of the origin for my purely snarky and nothing else remark about Obama eating dog does not give you the excuse to still call me racist and anti immigration in defense of your own ignorance. Just sayin' since you did use it as an excuse to do what you usually do at the drop of a hat.
Go ahead and defend the lady that the people you trust have told you to trust to replace the person they previously told you to trust until he couldn't be trusted to even carry their water anymore.
Keep it up and someday even you can grow up to be head water boy, boy.
Go back and really re-read my responses. You appear to have some reading comprehension issues. I never said anything about your dog post and I didnât call you a racist either. I just said donât be surprised if others think you are because you are doing your damndest to support and make excuses for one.
Even if Biden was still the candidate (seems both you and Trump need to be reminded he is not), he would still clearly be more qualified than a racist, hate mongering, Constitution crushing, vendetta pursuing, woman molesting, lying felon.
Tell me Kurt what fuels your dreams these days? That Trump wins the election and you can land a job as a bus driver to help round up all of these insane, cat & dog eating criminal illegal immigrants that are raping all of our women and causing crime at levels never seen before? You want to be on the front lines of the million plus illegal human roundup and hey if other brown skinned legal immigrants get swept up in the mix that wouldnât be such a bad thing after all. Right?
Fox Spews would just throw lie after lie questions at her. They'd be loaded with innuendo and partisan meaning. ABC mods took trumps rectum derived drivel and tossed it back where it belonged. Fox is NOT a legitimate News site, its Opinion As News. They are adept at sanitizing Trump's deranged rhetoric and behavior while demonizing others. Fox and Trump are both indicted on spreading falsehoods: Let's remember Dominion Defamation fine is $787.5 MILLION. Smartmatic seeks to depose four Fox officials as part of 2020 lawsuit. The voting technology company will also be able to obtain communications from Fox Corp. board members.
A Trial is tentatively set for 2025.
Kurt, Please tell me what other broadcast networks have had to face TWO DEFAMATION LAWSUITS?
Harris should not reduce herself to speak on a far right, journalistic credibility lacking, disinformation media that provokes violence.
âSmartmatic plans to pursue Foxâs board members as well to determine why they allowed the companyâs most valuable asset, Fox News, to spread disinformation about the 2020 election.â Asked about the Jan. 6 insurrection during Tuesdayâs presidential debate, Republican nominee Donald Trump said, âI had nothing to do with that other than they asked me to make a speech.â
This statement was contemptuous of reality.
18 days ago:
Isabeau wrote:
Good ol Kurtster, still splittin them shortNcurlies. STILL better than a convicted RAPIST and 34 counts FELON.
Next?
Isabeau wrote:
All of us, so many different personalities, political perspectives and values ...have been drawn here by MUSIC.
That's pretty doggone sacred. And no matter the differences here, I want that sentiment to remain a priority in my heart.
Location: center of the universe (fremont, seattle, that is)
Posted:
Sep 14, 2024 - 8:33am
kurtster wrote:
Well the topics sure were known in advance, duh, but ...
Harris began dodging on the very first question, are you better off today than you were 4 years ago ? . That was the hardest question she faced. Trump was fact checked and erroneously in the process. Harris was not. Trump got hard core follow up questions, while Harris got none. It is more than obvious to at least me, that Trump was dealing with openly biased and hostile moderators.
I agree that someone running for POTUS should be willing to show up anywhere and take them as they come at them. Harris needs to show up at Fox and show us what she really has and can she actually take it. Trump has. It is her turn.
Yes, she dodged and avoided providing direct answers, which was annoying but entirely predictable and probably a smart strategy. Trump, on the other hand, responded with blatant lies. âHaitians are eating cats in Springfieldâ was the gist of his entire argument why he should be president. What an idiot. And anyone who votes for someone like that is an idiot too.
Well the topics sure were known in advance, duh, but ...
Harris began dodging on the very first question, are you better off today than you were 4 years ago ? . That was the hardest question she faced. Trump was fact checked and erroneously in the process. Harris was not. Trump got hard core follow up questions, while Harris got none. It is more than obvious to at least me, that Trump was dealing with openly biased and hostile moderators.
I agree that someone running for POTUS should be willing to show up anywhere and take them as they come at them. Harris needs to show up at Fox and show us what she really has and can she actually take it. Trump has. It is her turn.
Fox Spews would just throw lie after lie questions at her. They'd be loaded with innuendo and partisan meaning. ABC mods took trumps rectum derived drivel and tossed it back where it belonged. Fox is NOT a legitimate News site, its Opinion As News. They are adept at sanitizing Trump's deranged rhetoric and behavior while demonizing others. Fox and Trump are both indicted on spreading falsehoods: Let's remember Dominion Defamation fine is $787.5 MILLION. Smartmatic seeks to depose four Fox officials as part of 2020 lawsuit. The voting technology company will also be able to obtain communications from Fox Corp. board members.
A Trial is tentatively set for 2025.
Kurt, Please tell me what other broadcast networks have had to face TWO DEFAMATION LAWSUITS?
Harris should not reduce herself to speak on a far right, journalistic credibility lacking, disinformation media that provokes violence.
âSmartmatic plans to pursue Foxâs board members as well to determine why they allowed the companyâs most valuable asset, Fox News, to spread disinformation about the 2020 election.â Asked about the Jan. 6 insurrection during Tuesdayâs presidential debate, Republican nominee Donald Trump said, âI had nothing to do with that other than they asked me to make a speech.â
This statement was contemptuous of reality.
Well the topics sure were known in advance, duh, but ...
Harris began dodging on the very first question, are you better off today than you were 4 years ago ? . That was the hardest question she faced. Trump was fact checked and erroneously in the process. Harris was not. Trump got hard core follow up questions, while Harris got none. It is more than obvious to at least me, that Trump was dealing with openly biased and hostile moderators.
I agree that someone running for POTUS should be willing to show up anywhere and take them as they come at them. Harris needs to show up at Fox and show us what she really has and can she actually take it. Trump has. It is her turn.
There was no fact-checking on policy or position for either candidate. She didn't answer questions, but Trump didn't answer a slew of questions including a direct one about how tariffs work.
Trump was "fact-checked" by moderators 3 times: Infanticide is illegal, nobody is eating pets, and you lost the election in 2020. Not addressing such obvious lies isn't fact-checking... it's an acknowledgment that facts and opinions are different. "Bidenomics is killing America" is an opinion. "You lost in 2020" is not.
You may not like them, but I think most people appreciate moderators calling out the obvious.
Given the circumstances, I call it a draw. No, especially if it is confirmed that Harris and ABC cheated and gave Harris the questions in advance. If there were to be another one it should be on Fox or not at all.
Gotcha. As somebody noted...the questions aren't a secret. If any of those questions surprised either of them, they shouldn't be running for President. It's just another distraction/conspiracy to throw on the pile. Time will tell, but I think this past week reinforced that the end for MAGA/Trump is coming.
Well the topics sure were known in advance, duh, but ...
Harris began dodging on the very first question, are you better off today than you were 4 years ago ? . That was the hardest question she faced. Trump was fact checked and erroneously in the process. Harris was not. Trump got hard core follow up questions, while Harris got none. It is more than obvious to at least me, that Trump was dealing with openly biased and hostile moderators.
I agree that someone running for POTUS should be willing to show up anywhere and take them as they come at them. Harris needs to show up at Fox and show us what she really has and can she actually take it. Trump has. It is her turn.
As somebody noted...the questions aren't a secret. If any of those questions surprised either of them, they shouldn't be running for President. It's just another distraction/conspiracy to throw on the pile.
Time will tell, but I think this past week reinforced that the end for MAGA/Trump is coming.
"She knew the questions in advance!!!"
We ALL knew the questions in advance. That's why she was prepared and he wasn't.
Economy, immigration, health care, dog recipes, Russia/Ukraine. This wasn't that hard to study for.
No, especially if it is confirmed that Harris and ABC cheated and gave Harris the questions in advance.
If there were to be another one it should be on Fox or not at all.
Gotcha.
As somebody noted...the questions aren't a secret. If any of those questions surprised either of them, they shouldn't be running for President. It's just another distraction/conspiracy to throw on the pile.
Time will tell, but I think this past week reinforced that the end for MAGA/Trump is coming.
If you're done discussing cats and dogs... can I ask you a couple of questions? I'm honestly interested in your very pro-Trump views.
Do you think he won or lost the debate?
Do you think he should do another one?
You can answer yes/no...expand on it with reasons why...whatever. I'm not going to respond with why you're wrong and provide examples.... just wondering. Thx.
Given the circumstances, I call it a draw.
No, especially if it is confirmed that Harris and ABC cheated and gave Harris the questions in advance.
If there were to be another one it should be on Fox or not at all.
Go stuff your famous sock puppets where the sun don't shine.
If you're done discussing cats and dogs... can I ask you a couple of questions? I'm honestly interested in your very pro-Trump views.
Do you think he won or lost the debate?
Do you think he should do another one?
You can answer yes/no...expand on it with reasons why...whatever. I'm not going to respond with why you're wrong and provide examples.... just wondering. Thx.
