[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Beer - kcar - Jul 4, 2025 - 9:19pm
 
Trump - R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 8:41pm
 
Democratic Party - R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 7:10pm
 
Hey Baby, It's The 4th O' July - islander - Jul 4, 2025 - 4:54pm
 
Russia - islander - Jul 4, 2025 - 4:51pm
 
July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone - fractalv - Jul 4, 2025 - 2:46pm
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - Jul 4, 2025 - 2:20pm
 
Britain - R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 1:41pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Jul 4, 2025 - 1:31pm
 
Artificial Intelligence - R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 11:39am
 
Ukraine - R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 11:10am
 
NY Times Strands - maryte - Jul 4, 2025 - 9:48am
 
NYTimes Connections - maryte - Jul 4, 2025 - 9:24am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Jul 4, 2025 - 8:08am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Jul 4, 2025 - 6:52am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jul 4, 2025 - 6:36am
 
Best Song Comments. - 2644364236 - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:32pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:29pm
 
Customize a shirt with my favorite album - eve0 - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:13pm
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:27pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 3, 2025 - 3:49pm
 
M.A.G.A. - islander - Jul 3, 2025 - 1:53pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 1:23pm
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:27am
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:23am
 
Israel - R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:10am
 
Documentaries - Proclivities - Jul 3, 2025 - 9:31am
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - Steely_D - Jul 3, 2025 - 8:36am
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:40am
 
Love & Hate - miamizsun - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:15am
 
Copyright and theft - black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:48am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - wossName - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:30am
 
Trump Lies™ - R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 5:01pm
 
Outstanding Covers - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:38pm
 
Protest Songs - R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:20pm
 
Fox Spews - islander - Jul 2, 2025 - 10:39am
 
Music Videos - black321 - Jul 2, 2025 - 8:02am
 
Economix - rgio - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:37am
 
New Music - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:30am
 
Carmen to Stones - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 1, 2025 - 7:44pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jul 1, 2025 - 5:27pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - rgio - Jul 1, 2025 - 11:06am
 
President(s) Musk/Trump - VV - Jul 1, 2025 - 8:10am
 
June 2025 Photo Theme - Arches - Alchemist - Jun 30, 2025 - 9:10pm
 
Please help me find this song - LazyEmergency - Jun 30, 2025 - 8:42pm
 
Forum Posting Guidelines - rickylee123 - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:17pm
 
Thanks William! - buddy - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:49pm
 
Living in America - R_P - Jun 30, 2025 - 3:15pm
 
Gardeners Corner - marko86 - Jun 30, 2025 - 10:39am
 
Comics! - Red_Dragon - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:59am
 
Birthday wishes - Coaxial - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:36am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:39am
 
Global Mix renaming - frazettaart - Jun 29, 2025 - 9:23am
 
Iran - R_P - Jun 28, 2025 - 8:56pm
 
Live Music - Steely_D - Jun 28, 2025 - 6:53pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 28, 2025 - 10:17am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jun 28, 2025 - 9:52am
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 3:00pm
 
Know your memes - oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 11:41am
 
What Makes You Sad? - oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:41am
 
Calling all Monty Python fans! - FeydBaron - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:30am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:23am
 
SCOTUS - Red_Dragon - Jun 27, 2025 - 8:30am
 
Framed - movie guessing game - Proclivities - Jun 27, 2025 - 6:25am
 
Yummy Snack - Proclivities - Jun 26, 2025 - 1:17pm
 
Parents and Children - kurtster - Jun 26, 2025 - 11:32am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 25, 2025 - 9:36pm
 
PUNS- Political Punditry and so-called journalism - oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 12:06pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 11:30am
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 10:32am
 
Astronomy! - black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 8:58am
 
The Grateful Dead - black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 7:13am
 
Billionaires - R_P - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:57pm
 
Great guitar faces - Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:15pm
 
Buying a Cell Phone - Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 3:05pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » Elsewhere » Russia Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 35, 36, 37  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 8, 2023 - 7:12pm

Figuratively of course!

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 8, 2023 - 3:31pm

Norway was the perfect place to base the mission.

In the past few years of East-West crisis, the U.S. military has vastly expanded its presence inside Norway, whose western border runs 1,400 miles along the north Atlantic Ocean and merges above the Arctic Circle with Russia. The Pentagon has created high paying jobs and contracts, amid some local controversy, by investing hundreds of millions of dollars to upgrade and expand American Navy and Air Force facilities in Norway. The new works included, most importantly, an advanced synthetic aperture radar far up north that was capable of penetrating deep into Russia and came online just as the American intelligence community lost access to a series of long-range listening sites inside China.

A newly refurbished American submarine base, which had been under construction for years, had become operational and more American submarines were now able to work closely with their Norwegian colleagues to monitor and spy on a major Russian nuclear redoubt 250 miles to the east, on the Kola Peninsula. America also has vastly expanded a Norwegian air base in the north and delivered to the Norwegian air force a fleet of Boeing-built P8 Poseidon patrol planes to bolster its long-range spying on all things Russia.

In return, the Norwegian government angered liberals and some moderates in its parliament last November by passing the Supplementary Defense Cooperation Agreement (SDCA). Under the new deal, the U.S. legal system would have jurisdiction in certain “agreed areas” in the North over American soldiers accused of crimes off base, as well as over those Norwegian citizens accused or suspected of interfering with the work at the base.

Norway was one of the original signatories of the NATO Treaty in 1949, in the early days of the Cold War. Today, the supreme commander of NATO is Jens Stoltenberg, a committed anti-communist, who served as Norway’s prime minister for eight years before moving to his high NATO post, with American backing, in 2014. He was a hardliner on all things Putin and Russia who had cooperated with the American intelligence community since the Vietnam War. He has been trusted completely since. “He is the glove that fits the American hand,” the source said.

Back in Washington, planners knew they had to go to Norway. “They hated the Russians, and the Norwegian navy was full of superb sailors and divers who had generations of experience in highly profitable deep-sea oil and gas exploration,” the source said. They also could be trusted to keep the mission secret. (The Norwegians may have had other interests as well. The destruction of Nord Stream—if the Americans could pull it off—would allow Norway to sell vastly more of its own natural gas to Europe.)

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 8, 2023 - 1:19pm

 cc_rider wrote:
I like to imagine my edits above are over-the-top.

Your analysis is spot-on, don't get me wrong. But our house is made of glass: we have done tremendous damage to our standing in recent years.

Peace,
c.




 ha.. not entirely without merit. But the US constantly shows that its merit lies in its flux. Despite appearances to the contrary, it is a very vibrant political system. Russia, by contrast, is sclerotic in the extreme.

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 8, 2023 - 1:11pm

How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline
The New York Times called it a “mystery,” but the United States executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret—until now
Seymour Hersch
Asked for comment, Adrienne Watson, a White House spokesperson, said in an email, “This is false and complete fiction.” Tammy Thorp, a spokesperson for the Central Intelligence Agency, similarly wrote: “This claim is completely and utterly false.”

cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 23, 2023 - 8:14am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

well, we are almost one year down the road since the invasion last February and my take on Russia the USA hasn't changed. 

The Soviet  US system of two-party rule is moribund, out-dated, failing on most metrics of good government and has entered its death throes -  just the Russian US people haven't quite realised it yet.
—-
—-
The next best alternative would be at least a leader who doesn't threaten Russia's  US' neighbours and learns how to play a cooperative role rather than an adversarial one in the geopolitical setting. One can only hope.

I like to imagine my edits above are over-the-top.

Your analysis is spot-on, don't get me wrong. But our house is made of glass: we have done tremendous damage to our standing in recent years.

Peace,
c.


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 20, 2023 - 7:24pm

No, Weakening Russia Is Not “Costing Peanuts” for the U.S.
As support slips for military funding to Ukraine, some analysts argue that America is getting a great deal for its money. But there are a lot of strategic costs that don’t show up on the balance sheet.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Gilead


Posted: Jan 19, 2023 - 4:00pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
well, we are almost one year down the road since the invasion last February and my take on Russia hasn't changed.  The Soviet system of one-party rule is moribund, out-dated, failing on most metrics of good government and has entered its death throes -  just the Russian people haven't quite realised it yet. It should have died in 1989 when most of its satellite states made the sometimes painful transition to pluralism, but in Russia it was instead resurrected by a member of the KGB, who appears to be personally affronted by the failings of the system he grew up in. He was given the room to breathe and flourish by European states, most notably Germany, who were happy to buy Russian oil and gas and mistakenly thought they could cash in by expanding their business empires into Russia, and, via business networks, keep Russia in check, totally ignoring Russian grievances and its understanding of itself as a world power done wrong by history. Well, that policy blew up in their faces big time. Basically, the whole thing is tragic and Ukraine is now bearing the cost of the failures of past European policy, again mostly led by Germany. So where to now? Russia is setting itself up to be humiliated (it already is being humiliated). IMO, this is entirely of its own doing as it seems intent on proving (to itself) that its system of one party tsarist rule is inherently superior to pluralism. You could blame Putin for this, but that would be mistaken. He is just an expression of a long Russian history, which is still trying to transition from tsarist rule-by-decree feudalism to rules-based democratic pluralism.  As just one point of anecdotal evidence, I table Medvedev's comments about the Japanese prime minister, Japan, back in the day, being another imperialist country bent on dominion that was forced to learn the error of its ways, also at the cost immense personal suffering (most of which borne by its neighbours). Something about this constellation between the US and Japan obviously triggered him big time. So should Russia be similarly humiliated? I hope not, but it is hard to envision a change in their mindset without the people realising their system is failing due to its own internal contradictions. With massive revenue from oil and gas and glorification of Russia as a quasi-religious entity deeply ingrained in their culture, there seems to be little incentive for them to make any fundamental change.  Moreover, the understanding for the need for a cultural reset must come from inside the country. I don't think you can easily impose this from outside, without creating a whole new set of grievances. I am not sure why I think this, and Japan seems to be an obvious example of the contrary, but for some reason I do.  Thus the current policy of avoiding open conflict between NATO and Russia seems to me to be the best way forward. However, I don't understand why there should be any restrictions on arming Ukraine. Europe in particular should stick by the principle of a sovereign nation having the right to arm itself to the hilt to defend itself from a foreign aggressor. Ukraine should be given all the tools it needs to do this. At present Ukraine is being forced to fight off the invasion with one hand tied behind its back, which is patently unfair and only prolonging the agony. One can only hope that whoever succeeds Putin initiates a managed transition to pluralism the way most eastern European states have managed it, but I fear this point is a long way down the road. The next best alternative would be at least a leader who doesn't threaten Russia's neighbours and learns how to play a cooperative role rather than an adversarial one in the geopolitical setting. One can only hope.
 

Agreed on all counts... this alternative perspective might interest you:

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2023 - 9:13pm

well, we are almost one year down the road since the invasion last February and my take on Russia hasn't changed. 

The Soviet system of one-party rule is moribund, out-dated, failing on most metrics of good government and has entered its death throes -  just the Russian people haven't quite realised it yet.

It should have died in 1989 when most of its satellite states made the sometimes painful transition to pluralism, but in Russia it was instead resurrected by a member of the KGB, who appears to be personally affronted by the failings of the system he grew up in. He was given the room to breathe and flourish by European states, most notably Germany, who were happy to buy Russian oil and gas and mistakenly thought they could cash in by expanding their business empires into Russia, and, via business networks, keep Russia in check, totally ignoring Russian grievances and its understanding of itself as a world power done wrong by history.

Well, that policy blew up in their faces big time. Basically, the whole thing is tragic and Ukraine is now bearing the cost of the failures of past European policy, again mostly led by Germany.

So where to now? Russia is setting itself up to be humiliated (it already is being humiliated). IMO, this is entirely of its own doing as it seems intent on proving (to itself) that its system of one party tsarist rule is inherently superior to pluralism. You could blame Putin for this, but that would be mistaken. He is just an expression of a long Russian history, which is still trying to transition from tsarist rule-by-decree feudalism to rules-based democratic pluralism. 

As just one point of anecdotal evidence, I table Medvedev's comments about the Japanese prime minister, Japan, back in the day, being another imperialist country bent on dominion that was forced to learn the error of its ways, also at the cost immense personal suffering (most of which borne by its neighbours). Something about this constellation between the US and Japan obviously triggered him big time.

So should Russia be similarly humiliated? I hope not, but it is hard to envision a change in their mindset without the people realising their system is failing due to its own internal contradictions. With massive revenue from oil and gas and glorification of Russia as a quasi-religious entity deeply ingrained in their culture, there seems to be little incentive for them to make any fundamental change.  Moreover, the understanding for the need for a cultural reset must come from inside the country. I don't think you can easily impose this from outside, without creating a whole new set of grievances. I am not sure why I think this, and Japan seems to be an obvious example of the contrary, but for some reason I do. 

Thus the current policy of avoiding open conflict between NATO and Russia seems to me to be the best way forward. However, I don't understand why there should be any restrictions on arming Ukraine. Europe in particular should stick by the principle of a sovereign nation having the right to arm itself to the hilt to defend itself from a foreign aggressor. Ukraine should be given all the tools it needs to do this. At present Ukraine is being forced to fight off the invasion with one hand tied behind its back, which is patently unfair and only prolonging the agony.

One can only hope that whoever succeeds Putin initiates a managed transition to pluralism the way most eastern European states have managed it, but I fear this point is a long way down the road. The next best alternative would be at least a leader who doesn't threaten Russia's neighbours and learns how to play a cooperative role rather than an adversarial one in the geopolitical setting. One can only hope.







miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2023 - 10:20am

putin isn't just a criminal, he's a war criminal too


Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2023 - 10:43am

 westslope wrote:
Wow, this site can't even do basic math.

They make five claims:
1) That's a lot of money
2) Not An Offensive Threat To Us
3) Russia Isn’t Our Enemy
4) We’re Not Destroying The Russian Military
5) Weaking Russia Doesn’t Help Us

I'll take this one at a time.

1) Clearly it's a lot of money, and yes it's more than Russia spends. The economics of defense spending are more complex than just translating rubles to dollars; I'll let an actual defense economist explain that, but one claim is that it's "nearly 9x the cost of a border wall that would actually protect America."

The border wall has cost (so far) $11B to build 458 miles (of 1,9510). At this rate it will cost an additional $36B to finish, assuming costs don't rise as the more-difficult (and largely roadless) sections got built. That the wall would "actually protect America" is pretty farcical, but let's do the math they're alluding to here:$100B is 2.8X $36B, not 9X.

If it seems unfair somehow that Russia is being outspent by the allies of the country it invaded then maybe Russia should stick to invading countries that can't fight back or find allies. It could invade Georgia again, say. Or kill some more Chechens.

2) Russia is not an offensive threat to the US...unless you count all the nuclear weapons it (by which I mean Putin) keeps threatening to launch at us. It is however a dire threat to our allies. They understand this even if many of us don't, and are contributing vastly more to Ukraine's defense (as a fraction of GDP) than we are. Whichever familiar anti-American trope you want to trot out about US defense aid (it''s just welfare for arms manufacturers/oil companies/a way to extend US hegemony over the rest of the world) how does that motivate, say, Estonia?

3) I think we need to take Russia's word on this. They certainly see us (and NATO as a whole) as their enemy regardless of how we see them.

4) The argument that Russia's military isn't being destroyed because they can always build more tanks ignores that those tanks (and missiles and aircraft and artillery shells and Iranian drones) need to be paid for. Russia was already struggling with that. It is pulling T-62 tanks out of mothballs because it can't build as fast as they are being destroyed and abandoned.

The same goes for aircraft, ships, and other high-value hardware.

Russia is also losing men—lots of them. It's not replacing them either. They aren't all dying on the battlefield (tho an appalling number are), they're also fleeing the country to avoid mobilization.

5) What is Russia using its strength for? Keeping a lid on dissent within its  empire and bullying it's neighbors. If Russia's military hold over its vassal states weakens (and there are signs that is happening already) that empire could fly apart, and what happens with the shards is anybody's guess. When Iraq and Libya lost their strongman dictators the countries descended into war and chaos, chaos that wasn't contained to their borders. That is an outcome the world dreads, as it values stability more than the aspirations of the people under the thumbs of dictators.

But that isn't up to us, it's up to Russia. If Russia abandons its attempt to conquer Ukraine it will lose prestige, a Black Sea naval base, and various members of its leadership may be defenestrated, but other than the appalling cost it imposed on itself it won't lose anything that actually belonged to it. Withdrawing from Ukraine could free up troops and tanks to keep what remains of its empire in line. It can still sell gas to Europe (tho not as much as it used to) and  return to selling oil and grain and weapons to the rest of the world. It can still prop up friendly dictators in Syria and Cuba and Venezuela, but if Russia has few friends around the world that's on Russia, not us.

westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jan 1, 2023 - 11:18am

Revisiting The Rationale For Pouring Money Into Ukraine


Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: The foot of Mount Belzoni
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 31, 2022 - 10:08am

 kurtster wrote:
I dunno anymore.  It's like we're back to these are the good old days ... again.

Who would we want working this window stuff ?

Tsk tsk. The answer is too easy


oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 31, 2022 - 9:38am

 kurtster wrote:
I dunno anymore.  It's like we're back to these are the good old days ... again.

Who would we want working this window stuff ?
    
 
Maybe put in a call to the Department of Dubious Diabolics Anonymous...
The Batman villains of the 1960s TV show were a mix of campy fun and maniacal insanity
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 31, 2022 - 8:02am

putin agitprop stroking his fan club kgb style?



miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 31, 2022 - 7:47am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


It's their old folklore that says to always put a banana peel under an open window.


i know i shouldn't laugh
but that is funny for a quick second
dictators don't have to be very creative do they?
will karma eventually catch up to putin?
maybe the people he oppresses will get lucky 
because history
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 30, 2022 - 7:49pm

I dunno anymore.  It's like we're back to these are the good old days ... again.

Who would we want working this window stuff ?
    
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 29, 2022 - 12:11pm

 VV wrote:

Who knows? Maybe it is their security (having been bribed/threatened) that are actually doing it?





I think that is a good possibility.
VV

VV Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 29, 2022 - 8:44am

 haresfur wrote:

What I find odd is that an oligarch can't manage to hire good enough security to keep this from happening in another country

Who knows? Maybe it is their security (having been bribed/threatened) that are actually doing it?



haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 28, 2022 - 11:22pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:
What I find odd is that an oligarch can't manage to hire good enough security to keep this from happening in another country
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 28, 2022 - 2:05pm

 VV wrote:

I was thinking.... I never knew that Russians were so unsteady on their feet until I started hearing of all these oligarchs and Russian officials clumsily falling out of open windows to their deaths.
 
Must be a genetic thing.    



It's their old folklore that says to always put a banana peel under an open window.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 35, 36, 37  Next