nytimes.com/games/connections
- ScottFromWyoming - Sep 21, 2023 - 7:48am
Wordle - daily game
- rgio - Sep 21, 2023 - 7:48am
Radio Paradise Comments
- sunybuny - Sep 21, 2023 - 7:46am
Fox Spews
- kcar - Sep 21, 2023 - 7:35am
New Music
- rexi - Sep 21, 2023 - 7:34am
What Makes You Laugh?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 21, 2023 - 7:24am
Things You Thought Today
- oldviolin - Sep 21, 2023 - 6:13am
Trump
- kcar - Sep 21, 2023 - 6:06am
Anti-War
- Red_Dragon - Sep 20, 2023 - 9:12pm
Happy Halloween Yall!
- Red_Dragon - Sep 20, 2023 - 8:55pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 20, 2023 - 8:43pm
Children and the Future
- R_P - Sep 20, 2023 - 7:35pm
Unresearched Conspiracy Theories
- Red_Dragon - Sep 20, 2023 - 4:56pm
Ukraine
- haresfur - Sep 20, 2023 - 4:24pm
USA! USA! USA!
- westslope - Sep 20, 2023 - 3:45pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- jarro - Sep 20, 2023 - 12:18pm
Rock Movies/Documentaries
- thisbody - Sep 20, 2023 - 11:16am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Sep 20, 2023 - 10:41am
Song about digging up bodies to deal with loneliness?
- ScottFromWyoming - Sep 20, 2023 - 10:14am
Baseball, anyone?
- ScottFromWyoming - Sep 20, 2023 - 10:02am
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group
- GeneP59 - Sep 20, 2023 - 9:09am
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore
- ptooey - Sep 20, 2023 - 6:37am
Outstanding Covers
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 20, 2023 - 4:24am
Climate Change
- haresfur - Sep 20, 2023 - 12:33am
YouTube: Music-Videos
- kurtster - Sep 19, 2023 - 11:54pm
::odd but intriguing::
- Manbird - Sep 19, 2023 - 8:04pm
Guns
- Red_Dragon - Sep 19, 2023 - 7:59pm
Good Deals !!!
- Steely_D - Sep 19, 2023 - 7:34pm
New announcer?
- vandys - Sep 19, 2023 - 4:52pm
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc.
- Red_Dragon - Sep 19, 2023 - 4:31pm
Plugin RP for Volumio
- NeilBlanchard - Sep 19, 2023 - 2:13pm
Music Requests
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 19, 2023 - 5:08am
Website Changes
- miamizsun - Sep 19, 2023 - 4:31am
What the hell OV?
- miamizsun - Sep 19, 2023 - 4:18am
Bad Poetry
- oldviolin - Sep 18, 2023 - 5:15pm
~ Have a good joke you can post? ~
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Sep 18, 2023 - 2:21pm
Download Manager IPhone problems
- RPnate1 - Sep 18, 2023 - 1:51pm
Tagline thought
- Steely_D - Sep 18, 2023 - 10:32am
Nature's Creatures
- Beez - Sep 18, 2023 - 10:30am
Is there any DOG news out there?
- Beez - Sep 18, 2023 - 10:15am
Things that piss me off
- GeneP59 - Sep 18, 2023 - 9:48am
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Sep 18, 2023 - 9:41am
Reviews and Pix from your concerts and shows you couldn't...
- oldviolin - Sep 18, 2023 - 9:37am
Are you ready for some football?
- black321 - Sep 18, 2023 - 8:59am
September 2023 Photo Theme - CONTRAST
- fractalv - Sep 18, 2023 - 7:53am
COVID-19
- R_P - Sep 17, 2023 - 2:32pm
Movie Recommendation
- Steely_D - Sep 17, 2023 - 1:28pm
RightWingNutZ
- Lazy8 - Sep 17, 2023 - 9:18am
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- GeneP59 - Sep 17, 2023 - 8:56am
Joe Biden
- Steely_D - Sep 16, 2023 - 9:14pm
Germany
- haresfur - Sep 16, 2023 - 7:22pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Sep 16, 2023 - 12:47pm
Poetry Forum
- ScottN - Sep 16, 2023 - 5:26am
Counting with Pictures
- ScottN - Sep 16, 2023 - 5:25am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 15, 2023 - 8:55pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- oldviolin - Sep 15, 2023 - 1:48pm
For a Limited Time Only - Sales and Bargains
- black321 - Sep 15, 2023 - 10:14am
sad music
- lily34 - Sep 15, 2023 - 7:59am
What makes you smile?
- Antigone - Sep 15, 2023 - 7:24am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- lily34 - Sep 15, 2023 - 6:15am
Manbird's Episiotomy Stitch Licking Clinic - KEEP OUT
- miamizsun - Sep 15, 2023 - 6:14am
R.I.P. Lou Reed
- Proclivities - Sep 15, 2023 - 4:04am
Favorite Quotes
- black321 - Sep 14, 2023 - 9:57pm
Russia
- R_P - Sep 14, 2023 - 2:26pm
Favorite Movie Quote Conversation
- Proclivities - Sep 14, 2023 - 11:34am
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone
- oldviolin - Sep 14, 2023 - 11:11am
Get the Quote
- Proclivities - Sep 14, 2023 - 9:09am
RadioParadise FAQ List Submission
- John_Carter - Sep 14, 2023 - 8:00am
what the hell, miamizsun?
- miamizsun - Sep 14, 2023 - 6:29am
What is the meaning of this?
- miamizsun - Sep 14, 2023 - 5:52am
Einstein quote of the day
- Manbird - Sep 13, 2023 - 6:24pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- GeneP59 - Sep 13, 2023 - 9:54am
Questions.
- Beaker - Sep 13, 2023 - 8:57am
Marijuana: Baked News.
- kurtster - Sep 12, 2023 - 12:51pm
Play the Blues
- oldviolin - Sep 12, 2023 - 12:03pm
|
Index »
Internet/Computer »
The Web »
Skeptix
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ... 42, 43, 44 Next |
R_P


|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2014 - 11:35am |
|
Great Pyramid at Giza Vandalized to 'Prove' Conspiracy TheoryTwo German men who visited the Egyptian pyramids in April 2013 now face criminal charges for their attempt to prove their "alternative history" conspiracy theories through vandalism. The men, Dominique Goerlitz and Stefan Erdmann, were joined by a third German, a filmmaker who accompanied them to document their "discoveries." The men were allowed to enter the inner chambers of the Great Pyramid at Giza normally off-limits to the public and restricted to authorized archaeologists and Egyptologists. The group reportedly took several items from the pyramids, including taking samples of a cartouche (identifying inscription) of the pharaoh Khufu, also known as Cheops. Goerlitz and Erdmann, who are not archaeologists but have instead been described as "hobbyists," allegedly smuggled the artifacts out of the country in violation of strict antiquities laws, according to news reports. In addition to the three Germans, six Egyptians are being held in connection with the case, including several guards and inspectors from the Egyptian Antiquities Ministry who allowed the men into the pyramid. Tourism, one of Egypt's most important industries, has dropped dramatically in recent years due to social and political unrest. Tour-agency owners — including one of the men recently arrested in connection with this case — are often willing to bend or break the rules if it means satisfying wealthy foreigners, news reports suggest. The German government expressed outrage over the acts, and categorically stated the men were private citizens and not in any way affiliated with its German Archaeological Institute. (...) The men are apparently convinced the cartouche identifying Khufu as the creator of the Great Pyramid at Giza is a fake, and they hoped to do an analysis on the pigments to prove they were not as old as the pyramids themselves. In essence, they claimed, pharaoh Khufu simply put his name on (and took credit for) pyramids that had been built thousands of years earlier by people from the legendary city of Atlantis. They accuse mainstream archaeologists of covering up — or willfully ignoring — evidence pointing to non-Egyptian origins of the pyramids. The conspiracy theories that Goerlitz and Erdmann endorse did not appear in a vacuum; instead, they have been widely promoted by best-selling authors such as Erich von Däniken, who wrote "Chariots of the Gods?" first published in 1968. Such authors claim the true builders of the pyramids were not ancient Egyptians but instead others, like extraterrestrials or residents of the legendary Atlantis. While "alternative history" and "ancient astronaut" theorists such as von Däniken do not explicitly endorse vandalism of any Egyptian sites, Goerlitz and Erdmann's actions were clearly driven by belief in such theories. (Ancient-astronaut theorists propose, unscientifically, that extraterrestrials intelligently designed humans.) (...)
|
|
helenofjoy

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 25, 2014 - 7:20am |
|
RichardPrins wrote:Who doesn't?  It's more about the ratio 'discovered' or rather concocted (or pulled from someone's... hat), that said that "if your ratio was greater than 2.9013 positive emotions to 1 negative emotion you were flourishing in life. If your ratio was less than that number you were languishing." Yeah - I got that - I'm not so amazed by it I think because it's such a perfect illustration of how a huge group of people can be herded into a solid belief about something that isn't true.
|
|
R_P


|
Posted:
Jan 25, 2014 - 7:04am |
|
helenofjoy wrote:I'm still opting for happy! Who doesn't?  It's more about the ratio 'discovered' or rather concocted (or pulled from someone's... hat), that said that "if your ratio was greater than 2.9013 positive emotions to 1 negative emotion you were flourishing in life. If your ratio was less than that number you were languishing."
|
|
helenofjoy

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 25, 2014 - 5:59am |
|
RichardPrins wrote:The British amateur who debunked the mathematics of happiness(...) "The Lorenz equation Losada used was from fluid dynamics," says Sokal, "which is not the field that I'm specialised in, but it's elementary enough that any mathematician or physicist knows enough. In 10 seconds I could see it was total bullshit. Nick had written a very long critique and basically it was absolutely right. There were some points where he didn't quite get the math right but essentially Nick had seen everything that was wrong with the Losada and Fredrickson paper." Sokal did a little research and was amazed at the standing the Fredrickson and Losada paper enjoyed. "I don't know what the figures are in psychology but I know that in physics having 350 citations is a big deal," he says. "Look on Google you get something like 27,000 hits. This theory is not just big in academia, there's a whole industry of coaching and it intersects with business and business schools. There's a lot of money in it." The concept of positive thinking dates back at least as far as the ancient Greeks. Throughout written history, metaphysicians have grappled with questions of happiness and free will. The second-century Stoic sage Epictetus argued that "Your will needn't be affected by an incident unless you let it". In other words, we can be masters and not victims of fate because what we believe our capability to be determines the strength of that capability. In one way or another, positive thinking has always been concerned with optimising human potential, which is a key component of psychology. But in the 20th century, confronting the great traumas of two annihilating wars, the psychology profession became increasingly focused on the dysfunctional and pathological aspects of the human mind. The emphasis was on healing the ill rather than improving the well. So it was left to popular or amateur psychology, and in particular that sector specialising in business success, to accentuate the positive. Books such as Norman Vincent Peale's The Power of Positive Thinking, published in 1952, became huge bestsellers. By the 1970s and 1980s, self-help had mushroomed into a vast literary genre that encompassed everything from the secrets of material achievement to the new age promises of chakras, reiki and self-realisation. (...) Suddenly a plethora of positive psychology books began to appear, written by eminent psychologists. There was Flow: The Psychology of Happiness by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, who with Seligman is seen as the co-founder of the modern positive psychology movement; Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realise Your Potential for Lasting Fulfilment by Seligman himself. And of course Fredrickson's Positivity, approved by both Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi. Each of them appeared to quote and promote one another, creating a virtuous circle of recommendation. And these books were not only marketed like a previous generation of self-help manuals, they often shared the same style of cod-sagacious prose. "Positivity opens your mind naturally, like the water lily that opens with sunlight," writes Fredrickson in Positivity. Then there was the lucrative lecture circuit. Both Seligman and Fredrickson are hired speakers. One website lists Seligman's booking fee at between $30,000 and $50,000 an engagement. In this new science of happiness, it seemed that all the leading proponents were happy. But then Nick Brown started to ask questions. (...)
I'm still opting for happy!
|
|
R_P


|
Posted:
Jan 24, 2014 - 1:46pm |
|
The British amateur who debunked the mathematics of happiness(...) "The Lorenz equation Losada used was from fluid dynamics," says Sokal, "which is not the field that I'm specialised in, but it's elementary enough that any mathematician or physicist knows enough. In 10 seconds I could see it was total bullshit. Nick had written a very long critique and basically it was absolutely right. There were some points where he didn't quite get the math right but essentially Nick had seen everything that was wrong with the Losada and Fredrickson paper." Sokal did a little research and was amazed at the standing the Fredrickson and Losada paper enjoyed. "I don't know what the figures are in psychology but I know that in physics having 350 citations is a big deal," he says. "Look on Google you get something like 27,000 hits. This theory is not just big in academia, there's a whole industry of coaching and it intersects with business and business schools. There's a lot of money in it." The concept of positive thinking dates back at least as far as the ancient Greeks. Throughout written history, metaphysicians have grappled with questions of happiness and free will. The second-century Stoic sage Epictetus argued that "Your will needn't be affected by an incident unless you let it". In other words, we can be masters and not victims of fate because what we believe our capability to be determines the strength of that capability. In one way or another, positive thinking has always been concerned with optimising human potential, which is a key component of psychology. But in the 20th century, confronting the great traumas of two annihilating wars, the psychology profession became increasingly focused on the dysfunctional and pathological aspects of the human mind. The emphasis was on healing the ill rather than improving the well. So it was left to popular or amateur psychology, and in particular that sector specialising in business success, to accentuate the positive. Books such as Norman Vincent Peale's The Power of Positive Thinking, published in 1952, became huge bestsellers. By the 1970s and 1980s, self-help had mushroomed into a vast literary genre that encompassed everything from the secrets of material achievement to the new age promises of chakras, reiki and self-realisation. (...) Suddenly a plethora of positive psychology books began to appear, written by eminent psychologists. There was Flow: The Psychology of Happiness by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, who with Seligman is seen as the co-founder of the modern positive psychology movement; Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realise Your Potential for Lasting Fulfilment by Seligman himself. And of course Fredrickson's Positivity, approved by both Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi. Each of them appeared to quote and promote one another, creating a virtuous circle of recommendation. And these books were not only marketed like a previous generation of self-help manuals, they often shared the same style of cod-sagacious prose. "Positivity opens your mind naturally, like the water lily that opens with sunlight," writes Fredrickson in Positivity. Then there was the lucrative lecture circuit. Both Seligman and Fredrickson are hired speakers. One website lists Seligman's booking fee at between $30,000 and $50,000 an engagement. In this new science of happiness, it seemed that all the leading proponents were happy. But then Nick Brown started to ask questions. (...)
|
|
R_P


|
|
R_P


|
|
R_P


|
Posted:
Nov 27, 2012 - 1:23pm |
|
What Should We Do With Our Visions of Heaven—and Hell?(...) In a cover story he wrote for NEWSWEEK and in an interview with The New York Times, Alexander sounds intelligent and sincere but a tad short on self-doubt. Pulling his rank as a neurologist, he insists that what he experienced must have been “real,” because during his coma his neo-cortex was completely “shut down” and “there is absolutely no way that I could have experienced even a dim and limited consciousness during my time in the coma, much less the hyper-vivid and completely coherent odyssey I underwent.” Absolutely no way? Really? As Martin Samuel, who heads Alexander’s former department at Harvard, tells The Times, “There is no way to know, in fact, that his neo-cortex was shut down. It sounds scientific, but it is an interpretation made after the fact.” I understand why skeptics like biologist P.Z. Myers deride Alexander’s claims as “bullshit,” but I can’t dismiss them so easily. I’m fascinated by mystical experiences, so much so that I wrote a book about them, Rational Mysticism (Houghton Mifflin, 2003), from which I’ve drawn some of the material that follows. Many people conclude, as Alexander did, that their experiences revealed Ultimate Reality, God, whatever. The problem is that different people discover radically different Absolute Truths. In The Varieties of Religious Experience, more than a century old and still the best book ever written on mysticism, psychologist William James described experiences, like Alexander’s, that revealed a loving, immortal spirit at the heart of existence. But James emphasized that some mystics have perceived absolute reality as terrifyingly alien, uncaring and meaningless. James called these visions “melancholic” or “diabolical.” James himself had at least one such vision, a kind of cosmic panic attack. One mystical expert I interviewed, German psychologist Adolf Dittrich, told me that mystical visions–whether induced by trauma, drugs, meditation, hypnosis, sensory deprivation or other means–fall into three broad categories, or “dimensions.” Borrowing a phrase that Freud used to describe mystical experiences, Dittrich called the first dimension “oceanic boundlessness.” This is the classic blissful experience reported by Alexander and many other mystics, in which you feel yourself dissolving into some benign higher power. Dittrich labeled the second dimension “dread of ego dissolution.” This is the classic “bad trip,” in which your self-dissolution is accompanied not by bliss but by negative emotions, ranging from mild uneasiness to full-blown terror. You think you are going insane, disintegrating, dying, and all of reality may be dying with you. Dittrich’s third dimension, “visionary restructuralization,” consists of more explicit hallucinations, ranging from abstract, kaleidoscopic images to elaborate dream-like narratives. Dittrich referred to these three dimensions as “heaven, hell and visions.” During a drug trip in 1981, I experienced all three dimensions described by Dittrich. The trip occurred in early summer, just after I had finished my junior year of college. I had left my apartment in New York City to visit friends in suburban Connecticut. One of these friends, whom I’ll call Stan, was a psychedelic enthusiast with an unusual connection: a chemist who investigated psychotropic drugs for a defense contractor in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. The chemist had recently given Stan a thimble’s worth of beige powder that was supposedly similar to LSD.* (...)
|
|
R_P


|
|
R_P


|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2012 - 8:03pm |
|
JrzyTmata wrote:I thought that was his halo I don't think Muslims have/use haloes...
|
|
JrzyTmata


|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2012 - 7:53pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote: I thought that was his halo
|
|
R_P


|
|
sirdroseph

Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2012 - 6:25am |
|
Proclivities wrote: That's all the proof I need praise Jesus. Now you got a picture of a cloud that looks like Jesus and that will debunk all of this climate change nonsense.
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2012 - 6:22am |
|
kurtster wrote: Pictures or it didn't happen.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Dumbf*ckistan 
|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2012 - 6:11am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:
Jesus laid an egg and
...the pope put a funny hat on it.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2012 - 6:08am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:
Jesus laid an egg and then came the chickens....duh.
 Pictures or it didn't happen.
|
|
sirdroseph

Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2012 - 5:57am |
|
kurtster wrote:If science is the answer or explanation for everything, then why don't we know which came first yet ... the chicken or the egg ?
Fail.
Jesus laid an egg and then came the chickens....duh.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2012 - 5:53am |
|
If science is the answer or explanation for everything, then why don't we know which came first yet ... the chicken or the egg ?
Fail.
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2012 - 5:23am |
|
miamizsun wrote: what happened?
as far as i know randi is a solid guy
To me he still seems pretty solid; he's just not so "amazing" anymore. Amazing is a tough thing to maintain.
|
|
miamizsun

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP) Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2012 - 4:27am |
|
Servo wrote:In related news, the "amazing" Randi has become about as amazing as Dennis Miller is funny.
what happened? as far as i know randi is a solid guy
|
|
|