[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

The Obituary Page - Red_Dragon - May 17, 2024 - 6:07pm
 
Gnomad here. Who farking deleted my thread? - Red_Dragon - May 17, 2024 - 5:59pm
 
Israel - R_P - May 17, 2024 - 4:08pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - triskele - May 17, 2024 - 4:04pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - triskele - May 17, 2024 - 4:01pm
 
NY Times Strands - ScottFromWyoming - May 17, 2024 - 3:32pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - ScottFromWyoming - May 17, 2024 - 1:43pm
 
Wordle - daily game - Steely_D - May 17, 2024 - 1:33pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - Beaker - May 17, 2024 - 1:28pm
 
NYTimes Connections - maryte - May 17, 2024 - 12:52pm
 
Name My Band - Isabeau - May 17, 2024 - 10:56am
 
DIY - black321 - May 17, 2024 - 9:16am
 
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful - Isabeau - May 17, 2024 - 9:02am
 
Other Medical Stuff - Isabeau - May 17, 2024 - 9:00am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Isabeau - May 17, 2024 - 8:44am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - May 17, 2024 - 6:24am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - May 17, 2024 - 5:15am
 
Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 17, 2024 - 3:57am
 
TV shows you watch - Steely_D - May 17, 2024 - 3:14am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - ScottN - May 16, 2024 - 7:00pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - RPnate1 - May 16, 2024 - 3:33pm
 
Your Local News - Proclivities - May 16, 2024 - 12:51pm
 
Alexa Show - thisbody - May 16, 2024 - 12:15pm
 
What can you hear right now? - thisbody - May 16, 2024 - 11:00am
 
Things You Thought Today - thisbody - May 16, 2024 - 10:25am
 
Joe Biden - Steely_D - May 16, 2024 - 1:02am
 
Climate Change - R_P - May 15, 2024 - 9:38pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 15, 2024 - 4:13pm
 
how do you feel right now? - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 15, 2024 - 4:10pm
 
China - R_P - May 15, 2024 - 1:40pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 12:38pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 11:50am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 11:48am
 
Science is bullsh*t - oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 11:44am
 
NASA & other news from space - Beaker - May 15, 2024 - 9:29am
 
Artificial Intelligence - thisbody - May 15, 2024 - 8:25am
 
Human Rights (Can Science Point The Way) - miamizsun - May 15, 2024 - 5:50am
 
Play the Blues - Steely_D - May 15, 2024 - 1:50am
 
Music library - mbellenberg - May 15, 2024 - 1:01am
 
Animal Resistance - R_P - May 14, 2024 - 6:37pm
 
2024 Elections! - R_P - May 14, 2024 - 6:00pm
 
Fascism In America - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2024 - 4:27pm
 
punk? hip-hop? metal? noise? garage? - thisbody - May 14, 2024 - 1:27pm
 
Social Media Are Changing Everything - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2024 - 8:08am
 
Internet connection - ai63 - May 14, 2024 - 7:53am
 
Congress - Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 8:22pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - May 13, 2024 - 5:50pm
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - May 13, 2024 - 1:25pm
 
Surfing! - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 13, 2024 - 1:21pm
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - May 13, 2024 - 11:38am
 
What Did You See Today? - kurtster - May 13, 2024 - 10:35am
 
See This Film - Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 8:35am
 
Podcast recommendations??? - ColdMiser - May 13, 2024 - 7:50am
 
News of the Weird - Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 5:05am
 
Trump - Steely_D - May 12, 2024 - 3:35pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - May 12, 2024 - 11:31am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - May 12, 2024 - 9:16am
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - Steely_D - May 12, 2024 - 9:04am
 
Baseball, anyone? - Red_Dragon - May 12, 2024 - 6:52am
 
Poetry Forum - ScottN - May 12, 2024 - 6:32am
 
Beer - ScottFromWyoming - May 10, 2024 - 8:58pm
 
It's the economy stupid. - thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 3:21pm
 
Oh dear god, BEES! - R_P - May 10, 2024 - 3:11pm
 
Tornado! - miamizsun - May 10, 2024 - 2:49pm
 
The 1960s - kcar - May 10, 2024 - 2:49pm
 
Marko Haavisto & Poutahaukat - thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 7:57am
 
Living in America - Proclivities - May 10, 2024 - 6:45am
 
Virginia News - Red_Dragon - May 10, 2024 - 5:42am
 
Outstanding Covers - Steely_D - May 10, 2024 - 12:56am
 
Democratic Party - R_P - May 9, 2024 - 3:06pm
 
RP on HomePod mini - RPnate1 - May 9, 2024 - 10:52am
 
Interesting Words - Proclivities - May 9, 2024 - 10:22am
 
Breaking News - maryte - May 9, 2024 - 7:17am
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - May 9, 2024 - 6:16am
 
Spambags on RP - Steely_D - May 8, 2024 - 2:30pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Climate Change Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 15, 16, 17  Next
Post to this Topic
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 3:14pm

 buzz wrote:

uh...yeah...thats pretty much it...i guess
 
This was about a week ago. I'm not backscrolling to get it all straight. 
 
You said something about science finding solutions to all our problems and making life good. something kinda like that sorta maybe more or less. Monsanto was the first thing that came to mind when I read that. I said it out loud. Don't over think it. It's me.
 
Jonas Salk saw a problem. He found the money and he solved it. The world needs more Jonas Salks. My distrust of the Climate Change industry started with Al Gore. Too many people making money without solving the problems. I am a little skeptical of climate change scientist because in order to stay in business and continue to get funding, they must continue to scream that the sky is falling. Whether it is or is not. 
 
I'm old and tired. Let it drop. 

 
90% of all scientists believe in climate change. You mean to say they are all bought off?

Salk received funding from what was to become the March of Dimes which was started by FDR. He didn't do it himself. He didn't find the money, the money found him. He took a research position at Pitt's School of Medicine after being turned down from other schools because he was Jewish.


buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 3:05pm

 steeler wrote:


Let's try again.

You throw out Monsanto. And I respond — admittedly, off the top of my head — with Jonas Salk. I did so because he is an example of a scientist whose work contributed significantly to better the human experience and he did so without seeking personal profit.  It would be relevant if your point — and I'm guessing as to what your point might be — were that scientists studying global warming are concocting findings for personal profit.

Now, I'm guessing that the point behind your post above might be that scientific research  funded through private sources is less suspect or more trustworthy than scientific research funded or subsidized in whole or in part by governmental sources?    

   

 
uh...yeah...thats pretty much it...i guess
 
This was about a week ago. I'm not backscrolling to get it all straight. 
 
You said something about science finding solutions to all our problems and making life good. something kinda like that sorta maybe more or less. Monsanto was the first thing that came to mind when I read that. I said it out loud. Don't over think it. It's me.
 
Jonas Salk saw a problem. He found the money and he solved it. The world needs more Jonas Salks. My distrust of the Climate Change industry started with Al Gore. Too many people making money without solving the problems. I am a little skeptical of climate change scientist because in order to stay in business and continue to get funding, they must continue to scream that the sky is falling. Whether it is or is not. 
 
I'm old and tired. Let it drop. 
ScottN

ScottN Avatar

Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 2:21pm

 hippiechick wrote:

Greenland is Melting, Literally

This is some scary stuff. According to NASA analysis of recent satellite readings, in just four days, nearly all of Greenland’s surface ice melted.

 

.........

Because if we don't act soon, Greenland will just be the beginning.



  Umh, HC, the impression you are making is simply untrue.  What is true is that it is melting at a record pace.  But it is almost two miles thick in some places.  The sea level would rise drastically, ocean currents altered, and the sea awash in icebergs.


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 1:50pm

 steeler wrote:
Let's try again.

You throw out Monsanto. And I respond — admittedly, off the top of my head — with Jonas Salk. I did so because he is an example of a scientist whose work contributed significantly to better the human experience and he did so without seeking personal profit.  It would be relevant if your point — and I'm guessing as to what your point might be — were that scientists studying global warming are concocting findings for personal profit.

Now, I'm guessing that the point behind your post above might be that scientific research  funded through private sources is less suspect or more trustworthy than scientific research funded or subsidized in whole or in part by governmental sources?   
 
i haven't back-scrolled so don't blame me

monsanto (a global lobbying powerhouse) and government(s) are special partners

they (monsanto) have the best state secured privileges money can buy

i guess my point would be is there any difference between the two (especially their trustworthiness)

in other words, both are corrupt and in bed together

can we trust them

i think there could be an influenced interpretation of what some scientist in the trenches says and what his superiors might say

whistle blowers don't do very well in corrupt political or corporate environs

regards



steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 12:21pm

 buzz wrote:

HITLER!
 

ok...not really, but i had to go with the first thing that popped into my head. you know how that is.
 

 

A quick looks show that Salk was privately funded by what would later become The March of Dimes. 


 

Let's try again.

You throw out Monsanto. And I respond — admittedly, off the top of my head — with Jonas Salk. I did so because he is an example of a scientist whose work contributed significantly to better the human experience and he did so without seeking personal profit.  It would be relevant if your point — and I'm guessing as to what your point might be — were that scientists studying global warming are concocting findings for personal profit.

Now, I'm guessing that the point behind your post above might be that scientific research  funded through private sources is less suspect or more trustworthy than scientific research funded or subsidized in whole or in part by governmental sources?    

   


Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 12:07pm

 hippiechick wrote:

Greenland is Melting, Literally

This is some scary stuff. According to NASA analysis of recent satellite readings, in just four days, nearly all of Greenland’s surface ice melted.

In a normal summer, 40 percent of Greenland’s landmass is covered by ice as the ice sheet shrinks by about half during the hottest months of the year. And on July 8th, things were still looking normal. 

But just four days later, 97 percent of Greenland’s icy blanket was thawing out, a record amount of melting in a record amount of time. 

“The discovery was so severe, researchers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California analyzing the satellite data thought it was a mistake. The space agency has monitored Greenland’s annual ice melt for 30 years, and has never recorded anything like this before.” 

As the U.S. suffered through a triple-digit heat wave, on July 11 and 12, Greenland was experiencing it’s own heat wave, with temperatures reaching a degree or two above freezing — which in the arctic, is utterly catastrophic. 

Not since 1889 has Greenland experienced such a melting event. Whether Global Warming caused the rapid melt or this is a natural event is still up for debate. Lets hope for the sake of Greenland and our entire planet, that this was an isolated event. 

Despite the mounting evidence of global warming, including Greenland melting in just four days — many of our elected leaders still refuse to admit that global warming is real, let alone do anything about it. Click here to sign our petiton demanding elected officials take this issue seriously.

Because if we don't act soon, Greenland will just be the beginning.



 
The wrong right is already shrugging loudly. Even with 3/4's of the US in drought and farmers dropping like flies. It's amazing how blind a political agenda and blatant stupidity can make some "thinking" apes.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 12:05pm

 miamizsun wrote:

bump

 
We'll see...
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 11:56am

 miamizsun wrote: 
bump
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 11:39am

Greenland is Melting, Literally

This is some scary stuff. According to NASA analysis of recent satellite readings, in just four days, nearly all of Greenland’s surface ice melted.

In a normal summer, 40 percent of Greenland’s landmass is covered by ice as the ice sheet shrinks by about half during the hottest months of the year. And on July 8th, things were still looking normal. 

But just four days later, 97 percent of Greenland’s icy blanket was thawing out, a record amount of melting in a record amount of time. 

“The discovery was so severe, researchers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California analyzing the satellite data thought it was a mistake. The space agency has monitored Greenland’s annual ice melt for 30 years, and has never recorded anything like this before.” 

As the U.S. suffered through a triple-digit heat wave, on July 11 and 12, Greenland was experiencing it’s own heat wave, with temperatures reaching a degree or two above freezing — which in the arctic, is utterly catastrophic. 

Not since 1889 has Greenland experienced such a melting event. Whether Global Warming caused the rapid melt or this is a natural event is still up for debate. Lets hope for the sake of Greenland and our entire planet, that this was an isolated event. 

Despite the mounting evidence of global warming, including Greenland melting in just four days — many of our elected leaders still refuse to admit that global warming is real, let alone do anything about it. Click here to sign our petiton demanding elected officials take this issue seriously.

Because if we don't act soon, Greenland will just be the beginning.


helenofjoy

helenofjoy Avatar

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Gender: Female


Posted: Aug 5, 2012 - 11:08am

 Umberdog wrote:

Better than paying their fair share in taxes?

 
Winning "a game."
Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 9:59pm

 Xeric wrote:
Yeah, because if that was accomplished, then, uh, well, then, uhmm . . . well, really, why the fuck would anybody be motivated to do that?
 
Better than paying their fair share in taxes?
Xeric

Xeric Avatar

Location: Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 8:02pm

 Umberdog wrote:
This is the BIG problem: The make believe and denial of the brain-washed, ditto-headed, greedy, multitude. Our weakest link.

 "The whole global warming thing is created to destroy America's free enterprise system and our economic stability." ~ Jerry Falwell

 



 
Yeah, because if that was accomplished, then, uh, well, then, uhmm . . . well, really, why the fuck would anybody be motivated to do that?
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 3:07pm

 buzz wrote:

HITLER!
 

ok...not really, but i had to go with the first thing that popped into my head. you know how that is.
 

 

A quick looks show that Salk was privately funded by what would later become The March of Dimes. 


 



You might just state your point. Perhaps I might then be able to understand it. No promises, though, as I am a simple man.
Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 12:03pm

This is the BIG problem: The make believe and denial of the brain-washed, ditto-headed, greedy, multitude. Our weakest link.

 "The whole global warming thing is created to destroy America's free enterprise system and our economic stability." ~ Jerry Falwell

 




buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 11:56am

 steeler wrote:


Jonas Salk

 
HITLER!
 

ok...not really, but i had to go with the first thing that popped into my head. you know how that is.
 

 

A quick looks show that Salk was privately funded by what would later become The March of Dimes. 

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 11:01am

 buzz wrote:

Monsanto
 
 
 
just sayin...

 



Jonas Salk
jadewahoo

jadewahoo Avatar

Location: Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2012 - 7:25pm

Given the procedures and options being offered by the techno-industrial civilization that has created this imbalance, there is no hope, there is no solution.
Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2012 - 7:21pm

Nature functions across millions of years. Humanity will be just a blink of her eye.
ScottN

ScottN Avatar

Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2012 - 7:13pm

 black321 wrote:

I dont see global warming as a problem for mother nature, so much as a potential disaster for the human race.  Regardless, we need to be investing in better technologies to get us away from polluting toxins and using up all our natural resources.

edit, and if we properly "invest" we could solve some of our economic issues to boot!
 
Of course. "Mother Nature " is the agency for change, not the victim, "we" are..  I think we caused it (planetary crisis) and a disaster of epic proportions is imminent as measured in a few decades, not centuries.  If we stopped all pollution today (unrealistic to an inconceivable degree), the atmosphere is still overloaded.  We have passed the tipping point.  The economic advantages, whatever they may be, will be for the survivors.  "Mother Nature", our Planet will certainly make a correcting mechanism to regain the equilibrium. I doubt we will like the method very much..  I am pessimistic that technology of any type can reverse, or even much mitigate, this outcome.  I guess this is one benefit of being older....I may not be around to suffer through it.


black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2012 - 2:04pm

 ScottN wrote:

My personal belief is we passed the tipping point before the subject was even much in dialogue.  The planet, as we live today, simply cannot sustainably support 7-8 billion peeps.  To me, it's a no brainer to think that dumping trillions of tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere annually over a couple of centuries won't have significant consequences.  Add to that all the other insults to which we have subjected our only planet and you have an inevitable future disaster.

 
I dont see global warming as a problem for mother nature, so much as a potential disaster for the human race.  Regardless, we need to be investing in better technologies to get us away from polluting toxins and using up all our natural resources.

edit, and if we properly "invest" we could solve some of our economic issues to boot!


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 15, 16, 17  Next