[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Economix - islander - Apr 23, 2024 - 12:11pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 11:05am
 
NY Times Strands - rgio - Apr 23, 2024 - 10:13am
 
Israel - R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 9:23am
 
NYTimes Connections - geoff_morphini - Apr 23, 2024 - 8:41am
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - Apr 23, 2024 - 8:35am
 
Trump - Steely_D - Apr 23, 2024 - 8:35am
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - sunybuny - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:53am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - sunybuny - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:52am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:40am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:33am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - Manbird - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:24pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Red_Dragon - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:42pm
 
The Obituary Page - miamizsun - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:26pm
 
Ukraine - haresfur - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:19pm
 
songs that ROCK! - Steely_D - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:50pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - q4Fry - Apr 22, 2024 - 11:57am
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:59am
 
Republican Party - R_P - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:36am
 
Mini Meetups - Post Here! - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 22, 2024 - 8:59am
 
Malaysia - dcruzj - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:30am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:02am
 
Canada - westslope - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:23am
 
Russia - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:03am
 
Broccoli for cats - you gotta see this! - Bill_J - Apr 21, 2024 - 6:16pm
 
TV shows you watch - Manbird - Apr 21, 2024 - 5:25pm
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 21, 2024 - 3:06pm
 
What's that smell? - oldviolin - Apr 21, 2024 - 1:59pm
 
Main Mix Playlist - thisbody - Apr 21, 2024 - 12:04pm
 
George Orwell - oldviolin - Apr 21, 2024 - 11:36am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Apr 20, 2024 - 7:44pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Welly - Apr 20, 2024 - 4:50pm
 
Radio Paradise on multiple Echo speakers via an Alexa Rou... - victory806 - Apr 20, 2024 - 2:11pm
 
Libertarian Party - R_P - Apr 20, 2024 - 11:18am
 
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance - fractalv - Apr 20, 2024 - 8:40am
 
Remembering the Good Old Days - kurtster - Apr 20, 2024 - 2:37am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - kurtster - Apr 19, 2024 - 10:41pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:21pm
 
The Abortion Wars - Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:07pm
 
Words I didn't know...yrs ago - Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:06pm
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:59pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:51pm
 
MILESTONES: Famous People, Dead Today, Born Today, Etc. - Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:44pm
 
2024 Elections! - steeler - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:49pm
 
Ask an Atheist - R_P - Apr 19, 2024 - 3:04pm
 
Joe Biden - oldviolin - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:55am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:55am
 
how do you feel right now? - miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:02am
 
When I need a Laugh I ... - miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:43am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 3:24pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:49pm
 
Robots - miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:18pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Steve - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:58am
 
Europe - haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm
 
Business as Usual - black321 - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:26pm
 
Science in the News - Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2024 - 11:14am
 
Magic Eye optical Illusions - Proclivities - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:08am
 
Just for the Haiku of it. . . - oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:01am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 8:52am
 
Little known information... maybe even facts - R_P - Apr 16, 2024 - 3:29pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:10am
 
WTF??!! - rgio - Apr 16, 2024 - 5:23am
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:58am
 
Earthquake - miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:46am
 
It's the economy stupid. - miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:28am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - thisbody - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:27am
 
Synchronization - ReggieDXB - Apr 13, 2024 - 11:40pm
 
Other Medical Stuff - geoff_morphini - Apr 13, 2024 - 7:54am
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:50pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:05pm
 
Poetry Forum - oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:45am
 
Dear Bill - oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:16am
 
Radio Paradise in Foobar2000 - gvajda - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:53pm
 
New Song Submissions system - MayBaby - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:29am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Trump Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1024, 1025, 1026 ... 1141, 1142, 1143  Next
Post to this Topic
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 8:35pm

 kcar wrote:

In this paper, we use the Moody’s Analytics model of the U.S. economy—adjusted to accommodate some recent financial-market policies—to simulate the macroeconomic effects of the government’s total policy response. We find that its effects on real GDP, jobs, and inflation are huge, and probably averted what could have been called Great Depression 2.0. For example, we estimate that, without the government’s response, GDP in 2010 would be about 11.5% lower, payroll employment would be less by some 8½ million jobs, and the nation would now be experiencing deflation.

 
You do know that Moody's bogus ratings were largely responsible for the collapse don't you ?

Moody’s, a division of Moody’s Corp., and S&P, a unit of McGraw Hill Financial Inc., gave triple-A ratings to those mortgage deals, making it possible for even conservative investors to buy securities backed by subprime loans that later turned out to be risky. When the housing market collapsed, losses on those bonds spread everywhere and deepened the crisis, costing investors billions of dollars.
...
Based in New York, and the world’s second-biggest ratings firm behind S&P, Moody’s was a major issuer of triple-A ratings on residential mortgage-backed securities before the crisis.
...

Moody’s had “inadequate models and methodology” to gauge the risk of subprime mortgages and exhibited a “relentless drive” to win market share, said Phil Angelides, the former California state treasurer who led the bipartisan Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, which included a case study of Moody’s in its 2011 report.

“What we found at Moody’s was very similar to the practices and conduct at Standard & Poor’s. The conduct and results were the same,” said Mr. Angelides. The 10-member commission concluded that credit-rating firms were “essential cogs in the wheel of financial destruction.”




kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 8:32pm

 kurtster wrote:
Here's one for the class.  

Of all the personal confrontations that Trump has been involved in during his campaign, and there are plenty,

how many did he start or take the first swing ?

 
Irrelevant question. 

This guy wants to be President. A President shouldn't get involved with personal confrontations on a numbingly regular basis, often with little or no provocation.

Right now Trump is destroying his candidacy by still—STILL—fighting with the Khans and getting into confrontations with Paul Ryan and John McCain. Republican candidates are quietly planning on trying to ignore Trump during their own campaigns. Even if he does get elected, he will have NO allies in Washington. 

Let's put aside questions on morality or standards of behavior. Based only on a pragmatic, cold-eyed view of the campaign, Trump should disengage from fighting with the Khans, if only to stop damaging his popularity and alliances.

But he is doubling down. Trump's behavior is ugly as a political spectacle. As a public display by a national figure, it's deeply disturbing. I am convinced that Trump is seriously mentally ill. 
JrzyTmata

JrzyTmata Avatar



Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 8:30pm

 kurtster wrote:
Here's one for the class.  

Of all the personal confrontations that Trump has been involved in during his campaign, and there are plenty,

how many did he start or take the first swing ?

 
he hit me first is the argument of a 5 year old




kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 8:21pm

 kurtster wrote:

Really ?  $800 billion later and this is what we get ?

 

 
Congrats on re-running the cheap and easy criticism. Republicans love to play this clip, apparently to claim that Obama, his economic advisors and Congress didn't know what they were doing. 

The Great Recession and the rapid response to it (by Bush's Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson as well as Obama's staff) were almost unprecedented. There was almost no time to act to avert disaster. There was no history of a rapidly needed, massive stimulus to guide Bush or Obama.

 Chew on this story from Nancy Pelosi: 

We then planned to meet at 5 p.m. that day, and I invited Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to join us. Later that evening, the meeting commenced, with Democratic and Republican leaders from both the House and Senate.

Secretary Paulson described a meltdown and financial crisis from the depths of hell.

When I asked Bernanke what he thought of the secretary's characterization, he said, "If we do not act immediately, we will not have an economy by Monday." This was Thursday night. Everyone in the room was flabbergasted.

...

On Saturday, Secretary Paulson sent us a three-page draft proposal with a price tag of$700 billion. Again, we were flabbergasted — this time, by the staggering amount and the fact that all authority would be placed in the secretary's hands. Democrats insisted that the final legislation include greater accountability and oversight.



You can play that clip of Obama's rueful joke as much as you want, but the stimulus and accompanying financial market policies such as TARP and the Fed's quantitative easing programs worked

 
Here is a summary of a paper, with my boldfacing of relevant sections, by Alan S. Blinder (highly respected Princeton University economist) and Mark Zandi (principal analyst at Moody's Financial Analytics and McCain's economic advisor during the 2008 campaign):

The U.S. government’s response to the financial crisis and ensuing Great Recession included some of the most aggressive fiscal and monetary policies in history. The response was multifaceted and bipartisan, involving the Federal Reserve, Congress, and two administrations. Yet almost every one of these policy initiatives remain controversial to this day, with critics calling them misguided, ineffective or both. The debate over these policies is crucial because, with the economy still weak, more government support may be needed, as seen recently in both the extension of unemployment benefits and the Fed’s consideration of further easing.

In this paper, we use the Moody’s Analytics model of the U.S. economy—adjusted to accommodate some recent financial-market policies—to simulate the macroeconomic effects of the government’s total policy response. We find that its effects on real GDP, jobs, and inflation are huge, and probably averted what could have been called Great Depression 2.0. For example, we estimate that, without the government’s response, GDP in 2010 would be about 11.5% lower, payroll employment would be less by some 8½ million jobs, and the nation would now be experiencing deflation.

When we divide these effects into two components—one attributable to the fiscal stimulus and the other attributable to financial-market policies such as the TARP, the bank stress tests and the Fed’s quantitative easing—we estimate that the latter was substantially more powerful than the former. Nonetheless, the effects of the fiscal stimulus alone appear very substantial, raising 2010 real GDP by about 3.4%, holding the unemployment rate about 1½ percentage points lower, and adding almost 2.7 million jobs to U.S. payrolls. These estimates of the fiscal impact are broadly consistent with those made by the CBO and the Obama administration. To our knowledge, however, our comprehensive estimates of the effects of the financial-market policies are the first of their kind. We welcome other efforts to estimate these effects. 




kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 8:19pm

Here's one for the class.  

Of all the personal confrontations that Trump has been involved in during his campaign, and there are plenty,

how many did he start or take the first swing ?


Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 5:56pm

 oldviolin wrote:

esse quam videri

 
yeah; BUT...
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 5:17pm

 islander wrote:

Always the goal. 

 
esse quam videri


islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 5:13pm

 oldviolin wrote:

A ha! An optimist!

 
Always the goal. 
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 4:31pm

 VV wrote:
 and the POTUS isn't a learn-as-you go position. 

 
Really ?  $800 billion later and this is what we get ?

 


VV

VV Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 3:33pm

 kcar wrote:

One article I read—WashPo or Politico.com—quoted anonymous sources within Trump's campaign who claimed that Trump planned on blaming the RNC for insufficient support and donation-gathering if Trump lost. 

He will definitely find someone to blame. His fragile ego won't allow anything else.  

 
Of that there is no doubt. The only real question is whose political careers will be permanently damaged from Trump's "stink" when this all ends.
 


kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 3:26pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:
Off course. That way it won't be his fault when he loses. The man is utterly incapable of taking responsibility for himself.

 
One article I read—WashPo or Politico.com—quoted anonymous sources within Trump's campaign who claimed that Trump planned on blaming the RNC for insufficient support and donation-gathering if Trump lost. 

He will definitely find someone to blame. His fragile ego won't allow anything else.  
VV

VV Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 3:22pm

 kurtster wrote:

I'll give you that, to be sure, on this one item.  I need to see him put new tools in his tool box.  If he does, great, he show how he learns from mistakes.  If he doesn't, then I dunno what to say.

To Rod:  I really think he's in it to win it and was from the beginning.  With all his bluster, its hard to see him wanting to end his life as a loser and a joke for the next century like Dewey.  And I'll disagree with the thought that Trump (or is it anyone ?) should be afraid of becoming our POTUS.  Unless, as you say, that he only did it as a stunt.  Then yes, he better be afraid.

{#Good-vibes} 

 
It's clear to the world that his "toolbox" is empty... save for the same rusty hammer he pulls out in repeated attempts to beat people who he feels have "crossed" him.

New tools? Sorry, if he hasn't used them yet it just means he doesn't have them (period) and the POTUS isn't a learn-as-you go position. 


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 1:37pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

 No, the shocking thing was that he had no tools in his toolbox to handle the situation.

 
I'll give you that, to be sure, on this one item.  I need to see him put new tools in his tool box.  If he does, great, he show how he learns from mistakes.  If he doesn't, then I dunno what to say.

To Rod:  I really think he's in it to win it and was from the beginning.  With all his bluster, its hard to see him wanting to end his life as a loser and a joke for the next century like Dewey.  And I'll disagree with the thought that Trump (or is it anyone ?) should be afraid of becoming our POTUS.  Unless, as you say, that he only did it as a stunt.  Then yes, he better be afraid.

{#Good-vibes} 
Alexandra

Alexandra Avatar

Location: PNW
Gender: Female


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 12:57pm

 Rod wrote:
I'm sure Trump never expected to be the nominee, but here he is, and I think the real possibility of actually becoming president scares the hell out of him, as it should. I really wonder if at this point, he is trying to be so outrageous with his newest insults, attacks and outright lies, that he loses to Hillary and can then scream about how the system is rigged and she stole the presidency from him. (He has already started on the rigging excuse) Yet with every bomb he tosses, his supporters blindly double down on supporting him. It must be driving him nuts! 

 
 

Along these lines - I have thought, all along, that he only did this to stir up shit (or else he works for the Clintons like the popular conspiracy theory), and really can't be bothered with the presidency. He's got too much else to do in his multi-millionaire world to be troubled with having to go to all the meetings and summits, etc.



Rod

Rod Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 12:24pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

“Obama-Clinton have single-handedly destabilized the Middle East, handed Iraq, Libya and Syria to Isis, and allowed our personnel to be slaughtered at Benghazi,” Trump wrote, in a single-paragraph release sent to reporters by his campaign. “Then they put Iran on the path to nuclear weapons. Then they allowed dozens of veterans to die waiting for medical care that never came. Hillary Clinton put the whole country at risk with her illegal email server, deleted evidence of her crime, and lied repeatedly about her conduct with endangered us all. They released criminal aliens into our country who killed one innocent American after another... and have repeatedly admitted migrants later implicated in terrorism.”

“They have produced the worst recovery since the Great Depression,” Trump continued. “They have shipped millions of our best jobs overseas to appease their global special interests. They have betrayed our security and our workers, and Hillary Clinton has proven herself unfit to serve in any government office.”



I know we all construct our own versions of reality, but this is giving construction a whole new twist. It is kind of interesting that Trump's reality is every bit as much a fabrication as his building projects. I think it is how his mind works. He wants an apartment with two bathrooms? There done! Problem solved. He wants a nemesis of his white male Anglo-Saxon version of the American dream as his opponent which he can beat at the election? There, done! This might work on TV. It might even work while canvassing for election, in fact it seems to. But what happens when reality comes up and hits him in the face? His reaction to the Khans gives us a pretty good indication. He just couldn't process the fact that here was a shining example of a real world couple who ran counter to all his preconceptions of what muslims stood for. The dissonance was too much so he fell back on his routine. The shocking thing was not his distaste for the Khans, though God forbid that was bad enough. No, the shocking thing was that he had no tools in his toolbox to handle the situation.

I'm sure Trump never expected to be the nominee, but here he is, and I think the real possibility of actually becoming president scares the hell out of him, as it should. I really wonder if at this point, he is trying to be so outrageous with his newest insults, attacks and outright lies, that he loses to Hillary and can then scream about how the system is rigged and she stole the presidency from him. (He has already started on the rigging excuse) Yet with every bomb he tosses, his supporters blindly double down on supporting him. It must be driving him nuts! 


NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 11:40am

“Obama-Clinton have single-handedly destabilized the Middle East, handed Iraq, Libya and Syria to Isis, and allowed our personnel to be slaughtered at Benghazi,” Trump wrote, in a single-paragraph release sent to reporters by his campaign. “Then they put Iran on the path to nuclear weapons. Then they allowed dozens of veterans to die waiting for medical care that never came. Hillary Clinton put the whole country at risk with her illegal email server, deleted evidence of her crime, and lied repeatedly about her conduct with endangered us all. They released criminal aliens into our country who killed one innocent American after another... and have repeatedly admitted migrants later implicated in terrorism.”

“They have produced the worst recovery since the Great Depression,” Trump continued. “They have shipped millions of our best jobs overseas to appease their global special interests. They have betrayed our security and our workers, and Hillary Clinton has proven herself unfit to serve in any government office.”



I know we all construct our own versions of reality, but this is giving construction a whole new twist. It is kind of interesting that Trump's reality is every bit as much a fabrication as his building projects. I think it is how his mind works. He wants an apartment with two bathrooms? There done! Problem solved. He wants a nemesis of his white male Anglo-Saxon version of the American dream as his opponent which he can beat at the election? There, done! This might work on TV. It might even work while canvassing for election, in fact it seems to. But what happens when reality comes up and hits him in the face? His reaction to the Khans gives us a pretty good indication. He just couldn't process the fact that here was a shining example of a real world couple who ran counter to all his preconceptions of what muslims stood for. The dissonance was too much so he fell back on his routine. The shocking thing was not his distaste for the Khans, though God forbid that was bad enough. No, the shocking thing was that he had no tools in his toolbox to handle the situation.


olivertwist

olivertwist Avatar

Location: Atlanta GA
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 5:31am


Is Donald Trump Just Plain Crazy?

By Eugene Robinson

During the primary season, as Donald Trump’s bizarre outbursts helped him crush the competition, I thought he was being crazy like a fox. Now I am increasingly convinced that he’s just plain crazy.

I’m serious about that. Leave aside for the moment Trump’s policies, which in my opinion range from the unconstitutional to the un-American to the potentially catastrophic. At this point, it would be irresponsible to ignore the fact that Trump’s grasp on reality appears to be tenuous at best.

Begin with the fact that he lies the way other people breathe. Telling a self-serving lie — no matter how transparent, no matter how easily disproved — seems to be a reflex for him. Look at the things he has said in just the past week.


Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 4:55am

Of course. That way it won't be his fault when he loses. The man is utterly incapable of taking responsibility for himself.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 2, 2016 - 2:11am

 haresfur wrote:

You do have one. Her name is Hillary.

 
Thank you! {#Lol}
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 1, 2016 - 9:25pm

 kurtster wrote:

Ah shucks, you didn't have to go and get all politically correct for me.

{#Notworthy} 

 
Never (burp) have been. Never (fart) will.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1024, 1025, 1026 ... 1141, 1142, 1143  Next