[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - Jul 14, 2024 - 4:00am
 
Trump - Jiggz - Jul 14, 2024 - 1:52am
 
What questions would you like to answer for the world? - kurtster - Jul 13, 2024 - 11:42pm
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Jul 13, 2024 - 11:14pm
 
Please don't ban me, but: Taylor Swift... - Steely_D - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:52pm
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - Jul 13, 2024 - 9:51pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 9:30pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 13, 2024 - 9:20pm
 
Joe Biden - kcar - Jul 13, 2024 - 4:36pm
 
AH! There's an elephant in the room! - Red_Dragon - Jul 13, 2024 - 3:42pm
 
The Obituary Page - Red_Dragon - Jul 13, 2024 - 3:05pm
 
Project 2025 - Red_Dragon - Jul 13, 2024 - 1:35pm
 
Outstanding Covers - DaveInSaoMiguel - Jul 13, 2024 - 12:49pm
 
Israel - R_P - Jul 13, 2024 - 11:01am
 
2024 Elections! - Steely_D - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:45am
 
Evolution! - R_P - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:34am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:28am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:23am
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:09am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:04am
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:03am
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 9:56am
 
NY Times Strands - maryte - Jul 13, 2024 - 9:28am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 9:24am
 
NYTimes Connections - maryte - Jul 13, 2024 - 9:24am
 
Europe - thisbody - Jul 12, 2024 - 11:35pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Jul 12, 2024 - 9:59pm
 
RP on Mac Just Stopped Working - tourtelot - Jul 12, 2024 - 9:35pm
 
July 2024 Photo Theme - Summer - Alchemist - Jul 12, 2024 - 3:00pm
 
Are they married yet? YES THEY ARE! - Manbird - Jul 12, 2024 - 2:51pm
 
Tech & Science - Manbird - Jul 12, 2024 - 2:46pm
 
Classic TV Curiosities - Proclivities - Jul 12, 2024 - 12:50pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - simonchutchings - Jul 12, 2024 - 11:24am
 
Ukraine - R_P - Jul 12, 2024 - 10:48am
 
New Music - R_P - Jul 12, 2024 - 10:23am
 
Things You Thought Today - rgio - Jul 12, 2024 - 9:44am
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Jul 12, 2024 - 9:35am
 
Florida - miamizsun - Jul 12, 2024 - 7:05am
 
Regarding Birds - Jiggz - Jul 12, 2024 - 1:41am
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - thisbody - Jul 11, 2024 - 10:36pm
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Jul 11, 2024 - 3:44pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Antigone - Jul 11, 2024 - 2:36pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 11, 2024 - 2:05pm
 
Record Store Day - Proclivities - Jul 11, 2024 - 8:18am
 
Rhetorical questions - Coaxial - Jul 11, 2024 - 7:03am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Jul 11, 2024 - 5:12am
 
Derplahoma! - sunybuny - Jul 11, 2024 - 4:39am
 
Russia - thisbody - Jul 11, 2024 - 3:11am
 
France - thisbody - Jul 11, 2024 - 3:04am
 
Britain - thisbody - Jul 10, 2024 - 11:36pm
 
Good Idea / Bad Idea - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 10, 2024 - 4:39pm
 
How's the weather? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2024 - 4:35pm
 
China - Red_Dragon - Jul 10, 2024 - 4:28pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 10, 2024 - 2:56pm
 
SCOTUS - Red_Dragon - Jul 10, 2024 - 2:20pm
 
Twitter and democracy - R_P - Jul 10, 2024 - 8:40am
 
Baseball, anyone? - Bill_J - Jul 9, 2024 - 8:58pm
 
The Truth About (Modern) Popular Music - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 9, 2024 - 8:51pm
 
Is RP stuck in a loop? - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 3:51pm
 
COVID-19 - oldviolin - Jul 9, 2024 - 2:18pm
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Jul 9, 2024 - 2:11pm
 
The Sound of Falling Water - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 9, 2024 - 2:04pm
 
Spambags on RP - GeneP59 - Jul 9, 2024 - 1:37pm
 
RP is stuck in repetitive loop of songs! WTH? - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 1:29pm
 
Make Scott laugh - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 11:33am
 
RightWingNutZ - R_P - Jul 9, 2024 - 11:09am
 
The Day the Sausage Died - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 10:43am
 
Philosophy (Meaty Metaphysical Munchables!) - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 10:41am
 
Best Funk ? - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 10:22am
 
Get the Quote - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 10:19am
 
Internet connection - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 9:59am
 
Nature's Creatures - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 9:13am
 
If not RP, what are you listening to right now? - david8 - Jul 9, 2024 - 7:30am
 
Breaking News - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 5:21am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 4:48am
 
Index » Regional/Local » Latin America » Guantánamo Resorts & Other Fun Trips Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
Post to this Topic
rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: May 26, 2009 - 1:36pm

Hard-luck Montana town pushes to house Gitmo detainees

This seems like a great idea.  Do we really think we can't safely house dangerous criminals on our own soil?  And if the answer to that question is no, then isn't it really unethical to house dangerous criminals on someone else's soil, so that they bear the risk?
dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 22, 2009 - 7:14pm

 RichardPrins wrote: 

A sad chapter in US history closing. As Etta James's voice reminded us at the inaugural balls, "At Last."
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 22, 2009 - 5:08pm

Obama moves to reshape US policy by closing Gitmo
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 10:28am

 edieraye wrote:

Scarily, I read it the way you meant it.   {#Eek}
 
Does that mean we are starting to think alike? {#Stop}

 
And yes, I am still avoiding my massive to-do list.  So far I've managed to make myself a mocha shake, feed the cat again, update my flickr page, and accomplish absolutely nada.
 

{#Eek}

You better hope not.  That would bode ill for you. {#Doh}
edieraye

edieraye Avatar



Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 9:47am

 steeler wrote:

{#Whisper} I, of course, meant to state "asylum" in my previous post, not "amnesty".  Correction made.     

 
Scarily, I read it the way you meant it.   {#Eek}
 
Does that mean we are starting to think alike? {#Stop}

 
And yes, I am still avoiding my massive to-do list.  So far I've managed to make myself a mocha shake, feed the cat again, update my flickr page, and accomplish absolutely nada.

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 9:29am

 edieraye wrote:
 

One thing that the President-Elect has in his favor that the current administration is sorely lacking is the goodwill of those countries who might take in those freed.  I think one of the problems has been that many countries in Europe and elsewhere have refused to accept released detainees.  So for the safety of the prisoners they continue to be held.  (Obviously I am not talking about all of them or trying to justify continued incarceration.  Just pointing out that this is one of the logistical nightmares which make the entire problem incredibly difficult and murky.)

My understanding is that security is another big problem.  Where are we going to incarcerate those found guilty?

There is a large segment of the Guantanamo Bay population - guilty and innocent - that no one wants.

Hopefully the Obama administration can capitalize its popularity worldwide to find hosts for freed detainees.  With assurances that the freed detainees will be monitored on the one hand for their own safety (deter reprisals) and on the other to assure that they will not participate in future terrorist activities.

 

Maybe.  Unclear where these folk are supposed to go if not their country of origin.  

{#Whisper} I, of course, meant to state "asylum" in my previous post, not "amnesty".  Correction made.     
edieraye

edieraye Avatar



Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 8:37am

 steeler wrote:

It would be interesting to see what would happen if one of the G-Bay prisoners, upon release, filed for amnesty, claiming he would be be subject to persecution if returned to a particular country.            

  

One thing that the President-Elect has in his favor that the current administration is sorely lacking is the goodwill of those countries who might take in those freed.  I think one of the problems has been that many countries in Europe and elsewhere have refused to accept released detainees.  So for the safety of the prisoners they continue to be held.  (Obviously I am not talking about all of them or trying to justify continued incarceration.  Just pointing out that this is one of the logistical nightmares which make the entire problem incredibly difficult and murky.)

My understanding is that security is another big problem.  Where are we going to incarcerate those found guilty?

There is a large segment of the Guantanamo Bay population - guilty and innocent - that no one wants.

Hopefully the Obama administration can capitalize its popularity worldwide to find hosts for freed detainees.  With assurances that the freed detainees will be monitored on the one hand for their own safety (deter reprisals) and on the other to assure that they will not participate in future terrorist activities.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 8:02am

 edieraye wrote:
Guantanamo Closure Called Obama Priority


Normally I don't like quoting long articles - I figure if you want to read that much you'll follow the link.  But the Washington Post requires a (free) registration so I posted more than usual.
The rest of the article outlines some of the problems the new administration will face as it constructs a policy for dealing with terrorist suspects.  There are no easy answers.  It sounds simple enough - close Guantanamo.  But the logistics will be incredibly complicated.  And what to do with those released?  Their lives are ruined.  Do we have a responsibility to aid them?  To what extent?  I don't think you can live in those conditions and not sustain some lasting damage.  So there is the human cost.  There is also the fact that being held will make them suspect if they were to be returned home.  Who will take them in?  And what about those who are prosecuted?  What are we going to do with them? 

And perhaps the biggest question of all, what will the policy be for future terrorist suspects?

 
It is a maze. 

There was talk of compensation for Japanese-Americans who were rounded up and put in camps during WWII.  I doubt we'll hear anything about that for any of these folk.

This is why the lack of judicial proceedings was so critical an issue.  Essentially, the prisoners fell into a legal and political black hole.  The administration did not want to concede that some of these folk were not actually dangerous because that would be tantamount to admitting they should not have been rounded up in the first place. 

It would be interesting to see what would happen if one of the G-Bay prisoners, upon release, filed for political asylum, claiming he would be be subject to persecution if returned to a particular country.            


hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 7:48am

 edieraye wrote:
Guantanamo Closure Called Obama Priority
By Peter Finn
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
The Obama administration will launch a review of the classified files of the approximately 250 detainees at Guantanamo Bay immediately after taking office, as part of an intensive effort to close the U.S. prison in Cuba, according to people who advised the campaign on detainee issues.

Announcing the closure of the controversial detention facility would be among the most potent signals the incoming administration could send of its sharp break with the Bush era, according to the advisers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak for the president-elect. They believe the move would create a global wave of diplomatic and popular goodwill that could accelerate the transfer of some detainees to other countries.

But the advisers, as well as outside national security and legal experts, said the new administration will face a thicket of legal, diplomatic, political and logistical challenges to closing the prison and prosecuting the most serious offenders in the United States — an effort that could take many months or longer. Among the thorniest issues will be how to build effective cases without using evidence obtained by torture, an issue that attorneys for the detainees will almost certainly seek to exploit.

Moreover, the new administration will face hard decisions regarding not just the current Guantanamo Bay detainees but also how it will handle future captures of terrorism suspects. It is unclear whether President-elect Barack Obama would consider holding some suspects without charge on national security grounds. His transition team denied reports this week that it was contemplating some form of preventive detention backed by a new civilian national security court. The idea has been a staple of legal debates over the future of Guantanamo Bay for the past year, but Obama advisers believe it would meet fierce congressional resistance.

"A great deal of attention has been focused on Guantanamo, as it should be, but Guantanamo is a symptom of a much larger question: Where and how is the U.S. going to detain and interrogate terrorist suspects it continues to pick up in combating al-Qaeda?" said Matthew Waxman, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for detainee affairs and now a law professor at Columbia University.
...

Normally I don't like quoting long articles - I figure if you want to read that much you'll follow the link.  But the Washington Post requires a (free) registration so I posted more than usual.
The rest of the article outlines some of the problems the new administration will face as it constructs a policy for dealing with terrorist suspects.  There are no easy answers.  It sounds simple enough - close Guantanamo.  But the logistics will be incredibly complicated.  And what to do with those released?  Their lives are ruined.  Do we have a responsibility to aid them?  To what extent?  I don't think you can live in those conditions and not sustain some lasting damage.  So there is the human cost.  There is also the fact that being held will make them suspect if they were to be returned home.  Who will take them in?  And what about those who are prosecuted?  What are we going to do with them? 

And perhaps the biggest question of all, what will the policy be for future terrorist suspects?

 
A very thoughtful post, Edie. One of the biggest problems with the Bush Admin is that they went headlong into Iraq without any forethought or planning, and left a huge mess in its wake. This is one of them. If those guys weren't terrorists when they went in, you could believe that they are now.

edieraye

edieraye Avatar



Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 7:40am

Guantanamo Closure Called Obama Priority
By Peter Finn
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
The Obama administration will launch a review of the classified files of the approximately 250 detainees at Guantanamo Bay immediately after taking office, as part of an intensive effort to close the U.S. prison in Cuba, according to people who advised the campaign on detainee issues.

Announcing the closure of the controversial detention facility would be among the most potent signals the incoming administration could send of its sharp break with the Bush era, according to the advisers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak for the president-elect. They believe the move would create a global wave of diplomatic and popular goodwill that could accelerate the transfer of some detainees to other countries.

But the advisers, as well as outside national security and legal experts, said the new administration will face a thicket of legal, diplomatic, political and logistical challenges to closing the prison and prosecuting the most serious offenders in the United States — an effort that could take many months or longer. Among the thorniest issues will be how to build effective cases without using evidence obtained by torture, an issue that attorneys for the detainees will almost certainly seek to exploit.

Moreover, the new administration will face hard decisions regarding not just the current Guantanamo Bay detainees but also how it will handle future captures of terrorism suspects. It is unclear whether President-elect Barack Obama would consider holding some suspects without charge on national security grounds. His transition team denied reports this week that it was contemplating some form of preventive detention backed by a new civilian national security court. The idea has been a staple of legal debates over the future of Guantanamo Bay for the past year, but Obama advisers believe it would meet fierce congressional resistance.

"A great deal of attention has been focused on Guantanamo, as it should be, but Guantanamo is a symptom of a much larger question: Where and how is the U.S. going to detain and interrogate terrorist suspects it continues to pick up in combating al-Qaeda?" said Matthew Waxman, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for detainee affairs and now a law professor at Columbia University.
...

Normally I don't like quoting long articles - I figure if you want to read that much you'll follow the link.  But the Washington Post requires a (free) registration so I posted more than usual.
The rest of the article outlines some of the problems the new administration will face as it constructs a policy for dealing with terrorist suspects.  There are no easy answers.  It sounds simple enough - close Guantanamo.  But the logistics will be incredibly complicated.  And what to do with those released?  Their lives are ruined.  Do we have a responsibility to aid them?  To what extent?  I don't think you can live in those conditions and not sustain some lasting damage.  So there is the human cost.  There is also the fact that being held will make them suspect if they were to be returned home.  Who will take them in?  And what about those who are prosecuted?  What are we going to do with them? 

And perhaps the biggest question of all, what will the policy be for future terrorist suspects?


Monkeysdad

Monkeysdad Avatar

Location: Simi Valley, CA
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:31pm

dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:26pm

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:25pm

nuggler

nuggler Avatar

Location: RU Sirius ?
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:24pm

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:22pm

Zep

Zep Avatar

Location: Funkytown


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:19pm

hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:14pm

Monkeysdad

Monkeysdad Avatar

Location: Simi Valley, CA
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:14pm

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:11pm

meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 12:56pm

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 14, 15, 16  Next