I don't really hate him. I hate what this whole situations symbolizes. He's a reasonably smart guy, who started with plenty of backing and support. He was never going to fail. That freed him up to take some chances and he got lucky and leveraged that into billions of dollars. He also took advantage of people along the way. And now he hordes so much resource, that a lot of other people who are equally smart aren't getting the chance to take a little risk because he's hording all the safety net that should be shared by all. There are many people who could do great things in our world, but they are constrained by worrying about healthcare and feeding their family. I doubt we can rid ourselves of all of this, but I do think we could provide a lot better base if we were willing to stop fetishizing people like Musk.
Paul Allen had a lot of money too. How's Stratolaunch Systems doing these days?
Jeff Besos' Blue Origin has a was to go to catch up. Virgin Gallactic (despite being funded by another billionaire, Richard Branson) just launched its first commercial cargo.
You don't hate him, but you give a mighty fine impression of someone who does. Do you feel the same towards Besos and Branson? They both own media companies too; Besos owns WaPo, Branson owns Virgin Media (what, you never heard of Virgin Media? No? I hadn't either).
You haven't mentioned why you think them being rich deprives other people of healthcare and food for their families, but the usual complaint is that they don't pay enough taxes. Maybe if we taxed them all into poverty we'd all get healthcare and food, because that's how that works, right?
Between the four of them their net worth is about $408B, That would fund federal healthcare benefits* for about 8 months. For one year.
Fetishizing Musk is stupid, but so is blaming him for all the troubles in the world. And if he gets blame for everything that goes wrong at any of his companies shouldn't he get credit for everything that goes right?
*In the form of Medicaid; trying to be as generous as possible to the premise, ignoring all the other programs. Medicare, for instance, is 30% more expensive than Medicaid.
No one is criticizing the many talented people who work for his organizations and are serious about their efforts (well, maybe not so much the boring company*).
But if you claim to be a genius and have armies of people online wording tirelessly to defend you all the time, at a minimum you should expect to be crosschecked. And as is now being shown by people who are engineers, this is another bit of blather that just doesn't hold up.
I don't really hate him. I hate what this whole situations symbolizes. He's a reasonably smart guy, who started with plenty of backing and support. He was never going to fail. That freed him up to take some chances and he got lucky and leveraged that into billions of dollars. He also took advantage of people along the way. And now he hordes so much resource, that a lot of other people who are equally smart aren't getting the chance to take a little risk because he's hording all the safety net that should be shared by all. There are many people who could do great things in our world, but they are constrained by worrying about healthcare and feeding their family. I doubt we can rid ourselves of all of this, but I do think we could provide a lot better base if we were willing to stop fetishizing people like Musk.
*speculation, but they certainly are not as serious as Space X.
i personally think he probably has some issues
i just don't know everything he has said or done
i only follow the business side of his life/companies
since buying twitter and posting a lot it seems he has become the target for loads of folks who obviously disagree with what he says
fair enough, he says he will deal with the consequences and that is on him
if he sent that email i would think he sent it to his employees, specifically managers, not the general public/twitter
i remember reading a few years back he sent email to his employees/managers
something like this:
Just wanted to say that I very much support music in the factory, as well as any little touches that make work more enjoyable.
An associate just sent me a note asking if we could have one ear bud for music so the other ear can listen for safety-related issues. That sounds fine to me.
Also, ambient music from speakers is also totally cool so long as there is reasonable agreement among your colleagues as to the music choices.
If there are other things that you think would improve your day, please let me know. I care very much that you look forward to coming to work every day!
The second one reminded everybody who the boss is.
To: Everybody
From: Elon Musk
Date: Monday October 4
Subj. Please Note
If an email is sent from me with explicit directions, there are only three actions allowed by managers.
1. Email me back to explain why what I said was incorrect. Sometimes, Iâm just plain wrong!
2. Request further clarification if what I said was ambiguous.
3. Execute the directions.
If none of the above are done, that manager will be asked to resign immediately.
No one is criticizing the many talented people who work for his organizations and are serious about their efforts (well, maybe not so much the boring company*).
But if you claim to be a genius and have armies of people online wording tirelessly to defend you all the time, at a minimum you should expect to be crosschecked. And as is now being shown by people who are engineers, this is another bit of blather that just doesn't hold up.
I don't really hate him. I hate what this whole situations symbolizes. He's a reasonably smart guy, who started with plenty of backing and support. He was never going to fail. That freed him up to take some chances and he got lucky and leveraged that into billions of dollars. He also took advantage of people along the way. And now he hordes so much resource, that a lot of other people who are equally smart aren't getting the chance to take a little risk because he's hording all the safety net that should be shared by all. There are many people who could do great things in our world, but they are constrained by worrying about healthcare and feeding their family. I doubt we can rid ourselves of all of this, but I do think we could provide a lot better base if we were willing to stop fetishizing people like Musk.
*speculation, but they certainly are not as serious as Space X.
They don't. not really. They are holding very tight tolerances (I've heard everything from 1 micronâbullshitâto 40 microns, and Lego won't say) but they are holding it over a several-orders-of-magnitude shorter distance. They are also working with a material with 10X the CTE of steel, so give them that.
So I tried t find some Legos to measure to see what my calipers tell me but I couldn't find a single one. Even tried walking around the house barefoot, but the kids have been gone too long.
Which means Lego has good process control and consistent materials. Nothing any good molder couldn't reporduce. But sheet metal is another animal. Steel doesn't come from the mill flat, it comes on a coil. You have to take that curvature out (curvature whose radius varies by a factor of two or more from the beginning to the end of the coil) before you even start making parts, but a steel part the size of a vehicle panel will deform much more than that depending on how you hold it.
Which isn't to say Musk is an imbecile, he's just out of his depth and talking out his ass. Apparently nobody at Tesla or SpaceX is willing to correct him, and most of his audience will just say "Whats a micron?" and be suitably impressed.
Yeah, there are dozens of reasons why Lego isn't a good benchmark for Tesla standards. Guess I really should have checked if Lego really did hold that standard when the statement started with such a ridiculous statement.
I had to check my math to be sure I was right about how small that is. I'm really impressed Lego holds that kind of tolerance.
They don't. not really. They are holding very tight tolerances (I've heard everything from 1 micronâbullshitâto 40 microns, and Lego won't say) but they are holding it over a several-orders-of-magnitude shorter distance. They are also working with a material with 10X the CTE of steel, so give them that.
So I tried t find some Legos to measure to see what my calipers tell me but I couldn't find a single one. Even tried walking around the house barefoot, but the kids have been gone too long.
Which means Lego has good process control and consistent materials. Nothing any good molder couldn't reporduce. But sheet metal is another animal. Steel doesn't come from the mill flat, it comes on a coil. You have to take that curvature out (curvature whose radius varies by a factor of two or more from the beginning to the end of the coil) before you even start making parts, but a steel part the size of a vehicle panel will deform much more than that depending on how you hold it.
Which isn't to say Musk is an imbecile, he's just out of his depth and talking out his ass. Apparently nobody at Tesla or SpaceX is willing to correct him, and most of his audience will just say "Whats a micron?" and be suitably impressed.
Funny he should mention Lego because that thing looks like it could be designed by the. A junior-high robotics team could have come up with something sweeter looking.
I had to check my math to be sure I was right about how small that is. I'm really impressed Lego holds that kind of tolerance.
he is out of control not only does he read every tweet/post, but he still has a plan to oppress co2 i've heard from sources he plans to go into this extreme renewable energy mode too if we don't act now he might succeed! please help!
he is out of control
not only does he read every tweet/post, but he still has a plan to oppress co2
i've heard from sources he plans to go into this extreme renewable energy mode too
if we don't act now he might succeed!
please help!
Galloway has consistently criticized Musk following his Twitter takeover, telling Huffington Post last year that Musk has a âtotal lack of graceâ when it comes to his leadership at Twitter. âThis is someone who, in my opinion, shows a bit of a God complex,â Galloway added. In yet another Threads post on Monday, Galloway appeared to voice that he would have supported Musk, had it not been for his outspoken opinions on Twitter. âElon would have been a legend ⦠if he hadnât started tweeting,â Galloway wrote.
He has also commented on a Reuters investigation into Tesla vehiclesâ driving range while also taking a shot at Muskâs ambitions to turn Twitter into an everything app. âTesla intentionally gave drivers rosy driving range projections, leaving many stranded,â Galloway posted on Twitter. âBUT you should totally bank with X.â Musk clapped back on Twitter, calling Galloway an âinsufferable numbskull,â and advising the best way to invest would be doing the opposite of what Galloway suggests.
Musk, who is a self-proclaimed âfree speech absolutist,â has a history of punishing anyone who deigns to criticize him, most recently appearing to slow down links to news outlets and Twitter competitors on his social media platform. Both The New York Times and Reuters were targeted, showing a roughly 10-second slowdown when opening a link via Twitter, while Facebook, Threads, and Bluesky were likewise affected.
Galloway also seems to be taking a leaf out of Muskâs own playbook by challenging him to a battle in a separate Threads post. âLord Elon,â he wrote, âAfter refusing to take a knee (meet), you banished me from the Twitter Hamletâtrue story. I demand trial by combat! Don King has agreed to host a battle to the death before a Taylor Swift concert. If you agree, I shall get an MRI that reveals bone spurs. FREEDOM (speech)!â
