Zep wrote: 
Ah the classic 'Mercan mcmansion - all crass, no class.

 kurtster wrote: 
And where does that money go? 

 
 

Where does bulk of the campaign $$$'s go ?

It goes to Madison Avenue and the Media in the form of advertising. 

 miamizsun wrote: 
Because we have convinced ourselves about American exceptionalism and believe all the rhetoric, instead of actually looking at the problems and being reasonable about solving them.

 hippiechick wrote: 
why?

 MsJudi wrote: 
Everything is broken
 

 olivertwist wrote: 
And where better that wasted money could be spent?

 hippiechick wrote: 
And I wonder if more could be accomplished in DC if there wasn't this perpetual election cycle. Oh, wait, probably not...

 hippiechick wrote: 
Exactly right except it's not "just" hundreds of millions anymore. 

“What we Americans go through to pick a president is not only crazy and unnecessary but genuinely abusive. Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent in a craven, cynical effort to stir up hatred and anger on both sides. A decision that in reality takes one or two days of careful research to make is somehow stretched out into a process that involves two years of relentless, suffocating mind-warfare, an onslaught of toxic media messaging directed at liberals, conservatives and everyone in between that by Election Day makes every dinner conversation dangerous and literally divides families.”
~Matt Taibbi

Cripes the polls are looking a bit tight now.

No difference?

Mitt Romney reveals his magical tax plan math. And it looks just like Bush's.

 

 cc_rider wrote: 
Wah wah wah

CEO Of Westgate Resorts Threatens Workers With Unemployment If Obama Elected

 black321 wrote: 

This is true, but I think we have already flown the coop on that one and are screwed no matter what. If the environment is your concern, I see no other choice than the Green party and anyone who proclaims to be truly concerned about the environment and votes Democratic are either ill informed or clouded by other partisan issues cause inevitably as you said, Democrats are utlimately owned by the same corporations who rely on the status quo as the Republicans.

 sirdroseph wrote: 
Supreme Court

 sirdroseph wrote: 
Right.  What does concern me is he will likely be less friendly with environmental issues...not that the dems are much better, but it is the one major issue I see where the two parties really do differ on a federal level. 

 black321 wrote: 

I see him in exactly the same light and because of this he has a very good chance at getting elected and I actually believe to be a good thing ultimately if he does become President because he does not passionately hold the social views that the evangelical, social conservatives do.  This brings me some comfort going into the what appears to be first Romney administration.  As far as what actually happens, I don't see it being much different than the Obama administration, which overall is probably not a good thing, but at least we don't have to worry about turning the social clock back because I don't see that as a Romney concern ala Reagans betrayal of the Evangelicals that supported his election.

 black321 wrote: 
Right now the Republicans are in charge, and he will do whatever they want him to do.

Hw will also get to appoint at least one SC judge, who will then have the opportunity to throw over affirmative action, Roe v Wade, etc.

 hippiechick wrote: 
I preface this by saying im not a supporter...but if his history shows anything, he will do whatever he thinks the people expect him to do...like he did in Mass. and what he did to get the GOP support.  My guess he will become more middle of the road, reflecting the country's mixed goals, if he becomes president.  In Mass his legacy was Romneycare.  The question is, what will his new legacy issue be?  I would guess fixing the economy, but at what cost?  More deficits or more divide among the haves and have nots?

As I said, I really dont think he has a personal agenda, like getting rid of abortion, rounding up all the terrorists....

 black321 wrote: 
How can anyone believe a man who changes from "hard conservative" (his words) to a squishy moderate? This man has no values whatsoever. Who knows what he will actually do if elected.