miamizsun wrote:
No, it gets blown out of proportion through amplification.

 R_P wrote:

you saying he made this up?
or that it didn't happen?

 miamizsun wrote:
Chicken Littles.

 R_P wrote:

mobius said the issue seems to be resolved
what this guy may not know is that mobius via franklin/temp has invested billions in china since the 80s
to suggest that he (either through frank/temp or mobius cap partners) isn't aware of the rules and regs is silly
he probably didn't read the article

 R_P wrote: 
That is readily apparent. Irony like sweets to the sweet.

 oldviolin wrote:
Judging the quality/intent of jokes comes with baggage.

 R_P wrote:
Well no, actually. That is my point. And within, a question. Why would an individual take the time and trouble to gain virtual followers to his comedy at the expense of common tragedy. It's not exactly satire. Perhaps its insecurity or loneliness. There's a lot of that going around. The internet thrives on it through sites and content providers just like this.
Hey I'm for open access. People have to decide for themselves what will satisfy their jones.  Call me rhetorical. I can take it.

 oldviolin wrote:
What's your point? Glass houses?

 R_P wrote: 
Easy enough, but what's the catch? Where's the glory for SpiritofHo? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rail_accidents_in_China

 R_P wrote:

the difference is that mobius is a peaceful individual
he isn't a government
and he has not initiated any violence or coercion on other peaceful people

 DaveInSaoMiguel wrote:

 miamizsun wrote:
Been going around. No honour among thieves.

They can see read you coming.

'I can't get my money out'

Time for the House Un-American Cargo Cranes Committee

Rah! Rah! Rah! So exciting!
US Army Secretary Says US Preparing to Win a War With China Over Taiwan