starcloud wrote: 

Please change the topic heading to

starcloud - NeoCon/Zionist Stooge

thankyouverymuch

 starcloud wrote: 

wow...city advisor! suddenly I still feel like a peasant...

 musik_knut wrote: 
as a recently appointed city advisor, that's exactly what I feel like!!!

 starcloud wrote: 

or Stooges for the masses...

 Lazy8 wrote: 

With tongue tucked firmly in cheek. Yet you feel that statement warrants you calling me a trollclown...?
Here's a little worldly advice. The fault is actually yours. You move through life expecting life to live up to your expectations. When it does not, something in life must be to blame. When a person does not conform to your expectations, its that person's fault. WRONG. WRONG Lazy8. The fault is yours for projecting your expectation onto another independent being & expecting them to conform to your will. What the hell kind of libertarian deal is that...? What the hell kind of controlling bullshit is that coming from a "libertarian"....? Huh ?

Now this is not me name calling. This is me merely stating a fact.
You're just an old man with old ideas who wants it all his own way. That's all.

 musik_knut wrote: 

Should we name the forum Shemp vs Curly?

 starcloud wrote: 

 perhaps? with a notable exception...ALL are welcomed!

 musik_knut wrote: 
should we start our own?!?!?  

arighter2 wrote:
Well, there's the grandstanding, the posturing, the inflammatory title...and this little gem:

 starcloud wrote: 

star,
you're welcome... I've yet to find a discussion forum that didn't have cliques...and I guess that is perfectly natural...???
mk

 BillnDollarBaby wrote: 
Shemp was far superior to Curly! 

 musik_knut wrote: 
  thanks musik, I've been listening for about 6 years and been on the forums for the past 4 and still haven't run off, but totally understand the cliqche!

 Lazy8 wrote:  I challenge you, Lazy, to substantiate this characterization.

 nuggler wrote: 

Your inflammatory accusation (NeoCon/Zionist) and personal insult (Stooge) to the President which you used as a topic header is unsubstantiated by the article you chose to begin the discussion.

 nuggler wrote: 

dude...lighten up...no one in here, as far as I know, is your enemy. As you well know, if you post something, it becomes fair play. Your tone with others is not serving you well. I've been mocked, you've been mocked, others too. That's just how it goes. You take a hit and move on. I've quarelled with some in here and it was over, others, they still take swipes at me meaning for them, it continues. That's also how it goes. And you probably know by now that this site is cliquish. I've been here over 4 years and still feel like an outsider. That is also how it goes...


Don't run off in a fit...stay, post your thoughts, defend them, move on.

Nuggs,
 The initial problem here is there is a wide disconnect between your issue and your conclusion. This alone all but  guarantees the lack of cogent response. Note: not a single person responded directly to your issue.

 dmax wrote: 

Look man, if you got something to say then say it & do it honestly.
I'm not new to this place & its ways. You were very deliberately hijacking the thread because something I said did not resonate with you.

 musik_knut wrote: 

Wow. I wasn't expecting that when I was merely making a side reference to something that took place earlier. I was not dictating to you.

So having said that why don't you go & post your any damn thing you want to. I'm outta here.

 nuggler wrote: 

Looks like "disagree any way you like" isn't really true, then, is it?

 nuggler wrote: 

nugs,
First, I'll post any damn thing I please within RP's framework. But, and most threads morph continually, I do prefer to stay on topic. I could not disagree with you more. I understand your lament: it's driven by seeing Zionists everywhere YOU turn and on that, I have to ask, why?  
mk