jadewahoo wrote:   Alpine wrote: 
A typical response from an America-hater supporter. We call that type of response a Pee-Wee Herman. Puerile, unintelligent and lame.

 Alpine wrote: 
That's just full of shit. No one could love this country more than him. Why else would he put himself in the unenviable position that he is in?

 Alpine wrote: 

 

 jadewahoo wrote: 

Fixed your typo.

Rove 'proud' of US waterboarding terror suspects

This man is anti-American. He hates America and what it stands for.

 marko86 wrote: 
I am not talking "kumbya stuff" and embracing it plus you seemed to take my mention of nuclear out of context.

Let's say no one responded to its first post just everyone completely ignored it.  It would be gone.  Instead every comment made in response to it has only increased its lifespan in this community.

When these types appear we would serve the community by making them invisible by ignoring them from the start until Bill has a chance to boot them.

We all do agree it is hateful and should be gone.  But I think we will probably end up agreeing to disagree how that is best accomplished.

 mzpro5 wrote: 

I am all for kumbaya stuff, it works most the time, but lets not equate a simple removal of a person as a nuclear option. It's cancer remove it. You don't like the wallpaper, move or paint over it. It's really just being practical instead of just ignoring it. It's a big ole internets. There are plenty of places for it,, just not here.

 Beaker wrote: 
I'm not saying anyone should grow a thicker skin - I am saying ignore it walk away.

The speech is hateful, ugly and I want no part of it.  But you are feeding the flames of it's hateful attitude.  Your comments towards it will only strengthen it's deluded self image no matter how true they are.

I never said hate speech was ok we just feel differently on how to deal with it.  Look how angry and frustrated this insignificant piss ant has made you.  It has accomplished its goal.

It's like one of those sci-fi films where they are trying to destroy the monster with nuclear weapons only to find out it feeds on nuclear weapons.  Fighting it with it's own rhetoric only makes it stronger.

 Beaker wrote: 
We agree on that

 Beaker wrote: 
It is a meditation on not allowing others to inflame your ego.

 mzpro5 wrote: 
Well said

 Beaker wrote: 
I certainly agree on most accounts but people are effected by such drival only if they let themselves.  Pay it no mind, do not feed it's need to disrupt others.  It wastes your energy and even the most negative comments feed it's horrendous and distorted thoughts.  It craves attention - starve it.

 marko86 wrote: 
If he hasn't crossed the line already, he will - Bill knows what he won't have around here, and, although pretty forgiving, the judgment is fair and final, and the execution is swift - even joe gave up, eventually.

 Beaker wrote: 

Damn if I don't agree with you. It was not going to go away. In fact, I would be surprised if it don't back. It would be the 1st time I have ever advocated a removal, but seemed like an extreme case to me with nothing to gain by leaving it be. I might have had to reconsided had there been any actual interest in music on what is a music board.

 Beaker wrote: 
Wow, you're actually giving him status?

 brandog wrote: 

*comes back to post this*

I googled "Sad Little Man" and got this:

Remember, these people are haters. Do you want to be like them, do you want to be a hater too?

Instead, I feel sympathy and sorrow for someone who is suffering in their lives so much, that they become such evil people.

Let us all send warm thoughts to this person, to allow him/her to see the light.

*s Beaker and goes away*