Trump
- Red_Dragon - Jul 4, 2025 - 3:29pm
July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone
- fractalv - Jul 4, 2025 - 2:46pm
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Jul 4, 2025 - 2:20pm
Russia
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 4, 2025 - 1:45pm
Britain
- R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 1:41pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - Jul 4, 2025 - 1:31pm
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 11:39am
Ukraine
- R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 11:10am
Democratic Party
- R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 10:54am
NY Times Strands
- maryte - Jul 4, 2025 - 9:48am
NYTimes Connections
- maryte - Jul 4, 2025 - 9:24am
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Jul 4, 2025 - 8:08am
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Jul 4, 2025 - 6:52am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Jul 4, 2025 - 6:36am
Beer
- SeriousLee - Jul 4, 2025 - 6:33am
Hey Baby, It's The 4th O' July
- Coaxial - Jul 4, 2025 - 6:18am
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:29pm
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:27pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 3, 2025 - 3:49pm
M.A.G.A.
- islander - Jul 3, 2025 - 1:53pm
Immigration
- R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 1:23pm
The Obituary Page
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:27am
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:23am
Israel
- R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:10am
Documentaries
- Proclivities - Jul 3, 2025 - 9:31am
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- Steely_D - Jul 3, 2025 - 8:36am
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:40am
Love & Hate
- miamizsun - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:15am
Copyright and theft
- black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:48am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- wossName - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:30am
Trump Lies™
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 5:01pm
Best Song Comments.
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2025 - 3:41pm
Outstanding Covers
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:38pm
Protest Songs
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:20pm
Fox Spews
- islander - Jul 2, 2025 - 10:39am
Music Videos
- black321 - Jul 2, 2025 - 8:02am
Economix
- rgio - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:37am
New Music
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:30am
Carmen to Stones
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 1, 2025 - 7:44pm
Climate Change
- R_P - Jul 1, 2025 - 5:27pm
Baseball, anyone?
- rgio - Jul 1, 2025 - 11:06am
President(s) Musk/Trump
- VV - Jul 1, 2025 - 8:10am
June 2025 Photo Theme - Arches
- Alchemist - Jun 30, 2025 - 9:10pm
Please help me find this song
- LazyEmergency - Jun 30, 2025 - 8:42pm
Forum Posting Guidelines
- rickylee123 - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:17pm
Thanks William!
- buddy - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:49pm
Living in America
- R_P - Jun 30, 2025 - 3:15pm
Gardeners Corner
- marko86 - Jun 30, 2025 - 10:39am
Comics!
- Red_Dragon - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:59am
Birthday wishes
- Coaxial - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:36am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:39am
Global Mix renaming
- frazettaart - Jun 29, 2025 - 9:23am
Iran
- R_P - Jun 28, 2025 - 8:56pm
Live Music
- Steely_D - Jun 28, 2025 - 6:53pm
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 28, 2025 - 10:17am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jun 28, 2025 - 9:52am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 3:00pm
Know your memes
- oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 11:41am
What Makes You Sad?
- oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:41am
Calling all Monty Python fans!
- FeydBaron - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:30am
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:23am
SCOTUS
- Red_Dragon - Jun 27, 2025 - 8:30am
Framed - movie guessing game
- Proclivities - Jun 27, 2025 - 6:25am
Yummy Snack
- Proclivities - Jun 26, 2025 - 1:17pm
Parents and Children
- kurtster - Jun 26, 2025 - 11:32am
What Makes You Laugh?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 25, 2025 - 9:36pm
PUNS- Political Punditry and so-called journalism
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 12:06pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 11:30am
What The Hell Buddy?
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 10:32am
Astronomy!
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 8:58am
The Grateful Dead
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 7:13am
Billionaires
- R_P - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:57pm
Great guitar faces
- Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:15pm
Buying a Cell Phone
- Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 3:05pm
Anti-War
- R_P - Jun 24, 2025 - 12:57pm
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
USA/Canada »
Breaking News
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 689, 690, 691 ... 718, 719, 720 Next |
musik_knut

Location: Third Stone From The Sun Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 9:03am |
|
hippiechick wrote:This is my last post about this. I am certainly not going to change your mind, and I like to have the last word.  If the "pro life" people were truly so, they wouldn't provide support for war, guns, and the death penalty. And since they do not support other means of pregnancy prevention, such as supporting Planned Parenthood, "anti-choice" is a much more fitting term. Conversely, "pro abortion" isn't necessarily a descriptive term, since the pro choice people may not be supportive of abortion, but support a woman's right to chose whether or not she wants to have a child, abortion being just one of those choices. The US gov under Bush would not even provide support to women in 3rd world countries for birth control. This is not pro life. OUr gov does not provide support for impoverished women who have babies, wanted or not. This is not pro life. Our gov would not support the morning after pill which would cut down the number of abortions performed in this country. Our gov under Bush refused to teach children how to prevent pregnancy, except through the ridiculous idea of abstinence. This is not pro life. And who are you to judge the conditions under which women choose to have an abortion? Incest yes, poverty no? The fact is that women have been aborting themselves since they figured out how. Denying them this support will not stop abortion, it will just promote more death. And until you are willing to support these women to have babies, provide them and the mother with health care, housing, education, emotional support, etc. then you are not pro life, you are anti-choice.
hc, LOL...I learned long ago, if not from my wife and two daughters, that women always have the last word. I accept that. LOL Buttttttttttt, and it's a big but, how many pro-choice members in Congress continue to vote the monies necessary for ops in Iraq and Afghanistan? Are they being hypocrites? Are they untrue to their pro-choice feelings? How much are they engaged in stopping the atrocities in say, Darfur? I don't believe this Government of The People, has an obligation to meet the financial needs of women in foreign lands on the issue of abortion. Again, you use social standing and circumstances as acceptable conditions for the abortion of human beings. Sorry, but I can not accept that. As I stated, it is more a failing of your side of the aisle on this matter to seek some common ground. I am not an advocate of outlawing all abortions as I have clearly expressed those exceptions I can accept, exceptions that I find to be within humane parameters. You continue to perhaps unwittingly, make the argument for abortion on demand. Is that what Roe was about? It appears to be what Roe evolved into. Again, you are wrong and in an irritating manner: I am PRO-LIFE. It would seem that wording is bothersome to you. PRO-LIFE: a meaning and feeling I am comfortable with. It should not lead to snide remarks like anti-choice. I could say, unfairly, that you are anti-life. I don't believe that for a moment to be the case so please allow any conversation to be free of insults like anti-choice in lieu of PRO-LIFE. Thanks, And, you may have the last word... mk
|
|
winter

Location: in exile, as always Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 9:02am |
|
islander wrote: Massive threadjack in RPland, RPeeps taking evasive action   That cracks me up. It's a viewscreen, not a window! They look like those people who watched the first movies and screamed because they thought the train was really coming at them.
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 9:00am |
|
SantaFeGrace wrote:So....is there any BREAKING news?   Massive threadjack in RPland, RPeeps taking evasive action
|
|
winter

Location: in exile, as always Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 8:59am |
|
Alafia wrote: Wow. What are the odds? There's a story for show-and-tell!
|
|
Alafia

Location: the dojo Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 8:57am |
|
|
|
SantaFeGrace

Location: Santa Fe, NM Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 8:47am |
|
So....is there any BREAKING news?
|
|
musik_knut

Location: Third Stone From The Sun Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 8:47am |
|
winter wrote: I haven't seen numbers supporting this assertion. I'm curious where you came by them.
The Consequences of Roe v. Wade 49,551,703 Total Abortions since 1973 Downward Trend Continues After reaching a high of over 1.6 million in 1990, the number of abortions annually performed in the U.S. has dropped back to levels not seen since the late 1970s. Two independent sources confirm this decline: the government's Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), Planned Parenthood's special research affiliate monitoring trends in the abortion industry. The CDC ordinarily develops its annual report on the basis of data received from 52 central health agencies (50 states plus New York City and the District of Columbia). AGI gets its numbers from direct surveys of abortionists. Because of these different methods of data collection, AGI has consistently obtained higher counts than the CDC. CDC researchers have admitted it probably undercounts the total number of abortions because reporting laws vary from state to state and some abortionists probably do not report or under-report the abortions they perform. Nevertheless, because increases and decreases in CDC and AGI numbers have until recently roughly tracked each other, both sources are thought to provide useful information on abortion trends and statistics. The CDC stopped reporting estimates for some states in 1998, making the discrepancy larger. Abortions from AK, CA, NH, and OK were not counted in 1998-99 CDC totals, and numbers for AK, CA, and NH were still missing from 2000-2002; CA NH and WV were excluded from 2003 and 2004. For those areas that did report, additional declines were seen between 1998 and 2001, and in 2003-2004. The CDC reported a slight increase in 2002, in contrast with the AGI numbers showing a slight decrease. AGI's latest survey confirms a continued downward trend, showing just over 1.2 million abortions for 2005, a drop of 8% from its last full comprehensive survey in 2000. This is the lowest number reported by Guttmacher since 1976. Using AGI figures through 20053, estimating 1,206,200 abortions for 2006 and 2007, and factoring in the possible 3% undercount AGI estimates for its own figures, the total number of abortions performed in the U.S. since 1973 equals 49,551,703. http://www.nrlc.org/ABORTION/facts/abortionstats.html ~~~~~~~~~~~ I don't come to this forum, or any forum for that matter, with wholesale make believe numbers. I've been challenged before and I accept those challenges. I'm sure some will quarrel with CDC numbers. They just refuse to believe the human carnage taking place out of sight and they put it, out of mind. There are many other sources. Shall I list them, too? Or would you better satisfy yourself with some self-education on the matter?
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 8:42am |
|
musik_knut wrote:
islander, Fair. Dr. Tiller acted within the laws of this nation. Dr. Tiller did not deserve to die in the manner he did. Fair? I was more than pleased when Eric Rudolph was finally taken into custody. I don't believe you support life and promote life, by taking the lives of those with whom you disagree. The killer of Dr. Tiller and the actions of Rudolph and those like him, are acts of domestic terrorism. mk
Thanks. This is a big point. We need to respect those that have differing opinions, and work within the system that we all agree upon for governance. If we can't do that, it's a hop/skip/jump to anarchy and civil war. And as much as I disagree with those who disagree with me, I welcome their presence in our shared great land and recognize that it is the presence of both of us and our differing opinions that makes it such a great place. musik_knut wrote: Oh, how I look to others and you? In this forum? Like I'm from Mars...and do I care? HELL NO! lmao...I know I'm probably seen more often than not as the proverbial skunk at a picnic...in this case, a Conservative at a Liberal's cliquish gathering. Fair? I think so.
mk
Is it time to go around on this one again? Yes RP has a liberal slant. Fox News and Free Republic have conservative slants. There is a whole continuum of opinions and approaches on both sides. I myself like guns, support the death penalty and would bring ~75% of our troops around the globe home to serve and protect our borders and assets. I believe in the smallest government possible with the least intrusion on personal freedoms. I consider myself much more of a libertarian (oddly w/o the crazed support of the right to bear arms), which while sharing the first 5 letters of 'liberal', has much more to do with liberty. RP is a fun place w/ cool people (almost all of them who aren't DD'd) of all persuasions. They value a good debate and an open discourse. Just because a bunch of them line up against you doesn't mean it's a vast left wing conspiracy.
|
|
hippiechick

Location: topsy turvy land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 8:35am |
|
musik_knut wrote:
hc, Let me speak bluntly on the point of war: I've been in one...in a stink hole 10,000 miles away...a hole called Nam. Don't seek to be on a level of that understanding unless you too, saw combat, feared for your very existence, saw buddies depart this world and watched civilians, as is always the case in any armed conflict, absorb the Lion's share of death and misery. And, I believe entering Iraq was a mistake, a mistake that should have been avoided. I'll refer to my opening statement on death and destruction and let that again, speak for me. I know where I've been and I know that since Roe, 49 MILLION others, mostly destroyed for the sake of convenience, not the mother's health or the cause of the resulting pregnancy, are not among us. You offer the same tired and maddening reasoning and never touch on the real reasons: abortion as a tool often used as after-the-fact birth control. You can not support the endless nonsense that streams from pro-choice folks on the real reasons behind birth control. If you don't wish to bear a child, don't. And don't starts by avoiding impregnation. That does not require a Sisyphean effort. I condemned the killing of Dr. Tiller. I don't know how often I must state that. And, I won't, again. I condemned the killing of the Officer at The Holocaust Museum. I detest the maddness of pure hate that drove Mr. Brunn to his actions. I detest that with every fiber of my being. And I detest abortion for the sake of convenience with those same fibers. I detest war and killings. If there are hypocrites among us, it is those Liberals who wring their worry beads about death and destruction in The Middle East and don't flinch at the deaths of 49 MILLION human embryos, many of which passed the viable stage before being denied due process: they were judged as not wanted and then executed. I will repeat: I have no problem with abortions in the case of the mother's health or the cause of the pregnancy, meaning rape or incest. But unlike you, I can't support abortions owing to social factors and stratus. Sorry, but from my point of view, you're without conscience on the matter of aborting human beings. Please tell me I'm wrong... mk
This is my last post about this. I am certainly not going to change your mind, and I like to have the last word.  If the "pro life" people were truly so, they wouldn't provide support for war, guns, and the death penalty. And since they do not support other means of pregnancy prevention, such as supporting Planned Parenthood, "anti-choice" is a much more fitting term. Conversely, "pro abortion" isn't necessarily a descriptive term, since the pro choice people may not be supportive of abortion, but support a woman's right to chose whether or not she wants to have a child, abortion being just one of those choices. The US gov under Bush would not even provide support to women in 3rd world countries for birth control. This is not pro life. OUr gov does not provide support for impoverished women who have babies, wanted or not. This is not pro life. Our gov would not support the morning after pill which would cut down the number of abortions performed in this country. Our gov under Bush refused to teach children how to prevent pregnancy, except through the ridiculous idea of abstinence. This is not pro life. And who are you to judge the conditions under which women choose to have an abortion? Incest yes, poverty no? The fact is that women have been aborting themselves since they figured out how. Denying them this support will not stop abortion, it will just promote more death. And until you are willing to support these women to have babies, provide them and the mother with health care, housing, education, emotional support, etc. then you are not pro life, you are anti-choice.
|
|
(former member)


|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 8:31am |
|
It Stopped Raining!
Oh, never mid - it started again...
|
|
SantaFeGrace

Location: Santa Fe, NM Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 8:29am |
|
Atman wrote:The number bandied about by so called 'pro-life' folks is completely pulled from the more productive parts of the Equine species (for an organic farmer). And it certainly doesn't take into account all the illegal abortions that took place every year before Roe v Wade (and still would if it were illegal). Or the abortions performed for rich women who just traveled elsewhere. Or the women who died as a result of botched abortions and their fear and shame. Break down anti-choice beliefs and it comes up Misogyny, pure and simple.
BTW, send all that data up here, I need the compost!
yep  btw
|
|
Atman

Location: Sandpoint, ID Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 7:55am |
|
The number bandied about by so called 'pro-life' folks is completely pulled from the more productive parts of the Equine species (for an organic farmer). And it certainly doesn't take into account all the illegal abortions that took place every year before Roe v Wade (and still would if it were illegal). Or the abortions performed for rich women who just traveled elsewhere. Or the women who died as a result of botched abortions and their fear and shame. Break down anti-choice beliefs and it comes up Misogyny, pure and simple.
BTW, send all that data up here, I need the compost!
|
|
winter

Location: in exile, as always Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 7:30am |
|
ptooey wrote:Point of order - this news is no longer breaking. TYVM
YMMV
TTYL
TTFN Good point.
|
|
ptooey

Location: right behind you. no, over there. Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 7:23am |
|
Point of order - this news is no longer breaking. TYVM
YMMV
TTYL
TTFN
|
|
winter

Location: in exile, as always Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 7:21am |
|
musik_knut wrote:
hc, Let me speak bluntly on the point of war: I've been in one...in a stink hole 10,000 miles away...a hole called Nam. Don't seek to be on a level of that understanding unless you too, saw combat, feared for your very existence, saw buddies depart this world and watched civilians, as is always the case in any armed conflict, absorb the Lion's share of death and misery. And, I believe entering Iraq was a mistake, a mistake that should have been avoided. I'll refer to my opening statement on death and destruction and let that again, speak for me. I know where I've been and I know that since Roe, 49 MILLION others, mostly destroyed for the sake of convenience, not the mother's health or the cause of the resulting pregnancy, are not among us. You offer the same tired and maddening reasoning and never touch on the real reasons: abortion as a tool often used as after-the-fact birth control. You can not support the endless nonsense that streams from pro-choice folks on the real reasons behind birth control. If you don't wish to bear a child, don't. And don't starts by avoiding impregnation. That does not require a Sisyphean effort. I condemned the killing of Dr. Tiller. I don't know how often I must state that. And, I won't, again. I condemned the killing of the Officer at The Holocaust Museum. I detest the maddness of pure hate that drove Mr. Brunn to his actions. I detest that with every fiber of my being. And I detest abortion for the sake of convenience with those same fibers. I detest war and killings. If there are hypocrites among us, it is those Liberals who wring their worry beads about death and destruction in The Middle East and don't flinch at the deaths of 49 MILLION human embryos, many of which passed the viable stage before being denied due process: they were judged as not wanted and then executed. I will repeat: I have no problem with abortions in the case of the mother's health or the cause of the pregnancy, meaning rape or incest. But unlike you, I can't support abortions owing to social factors and stratus. Sorry, but from my point of view, you're without conscience on the matter of aborting human beings. Please tell me I'm wrong... mk I haven't seen numbers supporting this assertion. I'm curious where you came by them.
|
|
Alafia

Location: the dojo Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 7:12am |
|
oldviolin wrote:
One thing your opinions ain't is lame, Ray.
Well, on this particular subject, some will probably think so...
|
|
oldviolin

Location: esse quam videri Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 7:11am |
|
Alafia wrote:Isn't there an "Abortion Discussion" thread y'all could move this to? I'll gladly chime in with my own lame ass opinions, just not here...
One thing your opinions ain't is lame, Ray.
|
|
Alafia

Location: the dojo Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 7:08am |
|
Isn't there an "Abortion Discussion" thread y'all could move this to? I'll gladly chime in with my own lame ass opinions, just not here...
|
|
meower

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 6:45am |
|
musik_knut wrote:
islander, Fair. Dr. Tiller acted within the laws of this nation. Dr. Tiller did not deserve to die in the manner he did. Fair? I was more than pleased when Eric Rudolph was finally taken into custody. I don't believe you support life and promote life, by taking the lives of those with whom you disagree. The killer of Dr. Tiller and the actions of Rudolph and those like him, are acts of domestic terrorism. Oh, how I look to others and you? In this forum? Like I'm from Mars...and do I care? HELL NO! lmao...I know I'm probably seen more often than not as the proverbial skunk at a picnic...in this case, a Conservative at a Liberal's cliquish gathering. Fair? I think so.
mk
I dont think you're from Mars. You're not advocating violence, we may disagree on choice/abortion, but I think you're OK....
|
|
musik_knut

Location: Third Stone From The Sun Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 12, 2009 - 6:31am |
|
islander wrote: music_knutwrote: If you read up on Dr. Tiller, he was damn determined to execute a child late in development. That is RADICAL, too. Perhaps not to you and others, but to many, yes, that is a radical use of abortion. Dr. Tiller killed more human beings than his killer did. His killer was wrong. And so was Dr. Tiller. One of two doctors in the US willing to perform the ghastly procedure required to end a life late in its development.
I'm open to being wrong here, but this reads to me like it was a tit for tat kind of thing. His statement of "killed more human beings than his killer did" makes it look like he thinks it is justified. He does say it was wrong, then immediately qualifies it with "so was Dr. Tiller". Nowhere has he acknowledged that Tiller was acting within the bounds of the law. That point to me is a huge difference between some one performing an unfortunate medical procedure that no one really wants to see but our larger society has recognized as occasionally necessary, and some one hunting down and killing (in a freaking church no less) some one who they have a fundamental disagreement with. Edit: I'd love to see MK clarify his points here. But as it stands it looks to me and a lot of others like he believes that murdering people who perform abortions is wrong, but an acceptable alternative to them continuing to perform abortions. islander, Fair. Dr. Tiller acted within the laws of this nation. Dr. Tiller did not deserve to die in the manner he did. Fair? I was more than pleased when Eric Rudolph was finally taken into custody. I don't believe you support life and promote life, by taking the lives of those with whom you disagree. The killer of Dr. Tiller and the actions of Rudolph and those like him, are acts of domestic terrorism. Oh, how I look to others and you? In this forum? Like I'm from Mars...and do I care? HELL NO! lmao...I know I'm probably seen more often than not as the proverbial skunk at a picnic...in this case, a Conservative at a Liberal's cliquish gathering. Fair? I think so. mk
|
|
|