rgio wrote:
Bingo.

I am wary of another 4 years of Biden as President because he would be 86 at the end of that term. I would say that about anyone who was in that position, so not just particular to Joe. In the main, I actually think the Biden administration has performed well to date. 

The reality is that most Biden voters voted against Trump in 2020. I expect that will be true again in 2024.

 kurtster wrote:
You are a walking projection machine.  Your party is very proud of you.

So let's say that somewhere the Republicans leading the impeachment find proof (to date, nothing like a recorded "perfect" phone call or rally directing his followers to stop the certification of an election with no "steal").  What happens next?

Trials?  Prison?

You come out here pounding your chest like you've proven something, followed by a statement like "You don't mean it if you say you want him punished too". 

You've got it backward (hard to believe for someone so worried about law and order).  Republicans will give anything to somehow turn Biden into a criminal so you can continue to support Trump.  LOOK!  He's a criminal!  You are supporting a criminal!  You're no better than us!

That's where you're wrong.  Bring proof, and I think most of the people here wouldn't support Biden.  I think it's clear most here don't want Biden to run again...but you want to ignore that and keep harping on his age. 

I'd say you're better than that, but if I've learned anything in the past 7 years, it's that you're not.   So dance around the fire with your party as you look for vindication, and continue supporting a well-documented crooked autocrat. 

Most people here (I believe) aren't really supporting Biden... they are aware of the danger of the apparent alternative and would support almost anyone on the planet to avoid 4 more years of "making us great again".  The damage done will likely be irreparable.  

Predictable deflections, tsk, tsk.

Quid pro Joe has nothing to worry about.  He's never discussed foreign business dealings with anyone.  He's told us that over and over again.

Hey, it's just another impeachment over a (vice) presidential phone call. This time around it's over a call (or two or three) about the weather.

Oh and please spare me the If Joe is guilty of anything he should be tried and prosecuted for it.   You're just virtue signaling if you say it.  No one here means it.

So go ahead, worry about Trump, not Joe, he'll be fine.  Except that he's not.  If nothing else, the past two weeks has made Joe the poster child for the 25th Amendment.  He is physically unable to perform the ceremonial duties of POTUS, let alone anything else..

.
Back to the crickets ...

"All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more that we have because we won the state. And flipping the state is a great testament to our country because, you know, this is just it’s a testament that they can admit to a mistake or whatever you want to call it. If it was a mistake, I don’t know. A lot of people think it wasn’t a mistake. It was much more criminal than that. But it’s a big problem in Georgia and it’s not a problem that’s going away. I mean, you know, it’s not a problem that’s going away. And, and we’ve got to ..."

 Steely_D wrote: 
We can add "but his laptop" to the good old "but her emails". Weak beer. Are the accusers of Biden the same folks who thought Jan 6 was "normal tourist visit"?

Lame, sad attempt to diminish the horrible things that Trump did while abusing his office. And, a massive waste of time by the government. Shame on them for wasting everyone’s time trying to do the fish dance.

 geoff_morphini wrote: James and his giant peach/ mint?

 kurtster wrote:

Sad little troll

 lily34 wrote: 

Don't.

 Coaxial wrote:

oh wow. that one went over my head and it was so simple. i feel stupid. 

 lily34 wrote: 
so clever...

 kurtster wrote:

ok. hmm. impeach spearmint candy?

          m





          ?

 Beaker wrote:

 kurtster wrote:

"Do not remember the source, but I do have confidence it its accuracy."

You do this A LOT. A LOT. The last time IIRC was something you saw somewhere on TV. Sorry I can't give you more detail than that, but you didn't really provide any to begin with. 

I am not rejecting your statements out of hand. I'm saying that you should provide evidence to back them up. Otherwise you're still stuck in the pumpkin patch at midnight. 

 kurtster wrote:
For as explosive as you paint this to be... it doesn't seem to have made the radar on mainstream news. 
 
Today is 8/23 and you made your post 6 days ago... and since then... 
 
...crickets. 

 Beaker wrote: 
Not only that but now it has come out that Joe used Hunter's credit cards as well as his credit lines to make purchases and what not to prevent any direct contact with Hunter's funds and Joe's name.  Now we know how Joe collected his 10% as the Big Guy.  Do not remember the source, but I do have confidence it its accuracy.  This was part of an email chain that also included Hunter bitching about having support to his Daddy for the last 11 years.

And to remind everyone what Joe's strategy throughout all of this was to engage in "plausible deniability" as told first hand to Tony Bobulinski in order to have answers to any questions for the purposes of misleading those wanting a closer look.

Is the room getting smokier or is the smoke starting to clear up a little ?