Warning: file_get_contents(/home/www/settings/mirror_forum_db_enable_sql): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/content/Forum/functions.php on line 8
Some of those advertisers announced during the quarter that they would pull advertising from Carlsonâs show after remarks the host made about the Black Lives Matter movement, but FNC viewers did not follow suit, instead lifting Tucker Carlson Tonight to a record high...
You posted the answers to your own questions. Yes, high ratings by FNC viewers definitely means quality/interesting/loyalty/whatever for FNC viewers! Just like Hannity before him!
FNC viewers say it's good, therefore it must be good!
Maybe this is obvious fluff trying to get some of those advertisers back.
Not sure what point you are trying to make in posting data that was 6 months old or more, at the time you posted it - and that assumes the graph you posted was even remotely accurate which I can't be bothered - or care to check.
Here's the results of your lame attempt to portray failure.
Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson closed out televisionâs second quarter with one for the record books: his Tucker Carlson Tonight finished the quarter as the highest-rated program in all of cable news for the first time since the showâs launch, delivering an average total audience of 4.331 million viewers. In the process, Carlson broke a record held by his colleague, Sean Hannity, for the highest-rated quarter of any cable news programâever.
It was a solid quarter for the network, which finished in first place across all of cable television for the first time in the networkâs history, beating out all basic cable networks among total viewers and viewers 25-54, the demographic group most valued by national advertisers.
Some of those advertisers announced during the quarter that they would pull advertising from Carlsonâs show after remarks the host made about the Black Lives Matter movement, but FNC viewers did not follow suit, instead lifting Tucker Carlson Tonight to a record high, breaking a previous record set in the first quarter of 2020 by FNCâs Hannity.
ââ
Gee - I wonder what he might have been going on about to attract a record-breaking audience? Must be interesting, no?
This happened yesterday. "On Monday, police left the intersection in front of SPD's East Precinct, which had turned into a stand-off night after night between officers and protesters. Protesters were left to march freely past the precinct and throughout the area. The area in Capitol Hill has since been converted into the "Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone," where booths with snacks and water line the streets and people hold discussions and teach-ins about police brutality and effecting change. The zone now also includes the words Black Lives Matter painted down the center, each
letter embellished with its own mural from a number of artists."
This happened yesterday. "On Monday, police left the intersection in front of SPD's East Precinct, which had turned into a stand-off night after night between officers and protesters. Protesters were left to march freely past the precinct and throughout the area. The area in Capitol Hill has since been converted into the "Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone," where booths with snacks and water line the streets and people hold discussions and teach-ins about police brutality and effecting change. The zone now also includes the words Black Lives Matter painted down the center, each
letter embellished with its own mural from a number of artists."
Took all of 5 seconds to find a countering opinion, and right on the RS website too.
***
OrangePopcorn 16 minutes ago
That part of the story was irrelevant. I was watching it live on Fox News.
I donât normally blindly support police actions, but when they came on scene, this family had their guns out.
The police had NO WAY to know who was who so they did what protocol dictates. Detain the potential threat, identify everyone. They didnât know if they were good guys or bad guys. Plus... they had guns in California. Theyâre lucky the cops didnât overreact and shoot everyone.
Once they were identified, they were released. Yes, the news crew was there, but the lady was just yelling incoherent sentences at everyone. Hell, even one of the cameramen was detained.
You really are a dumb ass. I'll stick to the actual video evidence rather than a post by "OrangePopcorn".
Whatever fits your narrative! Be aware that this individual is stating a news crew was there.
***
"Monet, the woman who was cuffed, told a Fox News local affiliate that she was surprised when the police put restraints on her, her husband and her brother-in-law, especially because the local reporter, Christina Gonzalez, who helped flag down the police, kept yelling to them that they had the wrong people."
âI was handcuffed, thrown up against a wall with my husband and brother-in-law, and Iâm like, âWhat the hell?'â she said. âThe news people are here and telling you itâs not her, sheâs trying to stop the situation.â
***
Prepare to have the facts handed to you on a silver platter - and ignore them again.
#DumbassUnite
I really got to you, didnât I? Way too easy. Carry on, KKK.
Took all of 5 seconds to find a countering opinion, and right on the RS website too.
***
OrangePopcorn 16 minutes ago
That part of the story was irrelevant. I was watching it live on Fox News.
I donât normally blindly support police actions, but when they came on scene, this family had their guns out.
The police had NO WAY to know who was who so they did what protocol dictates. Detain the potential threat, identify everyone. They didnât know if they were good guys or bad guys. Plus... they had guns in California. Theyâre lucky the cops didnât overreact and shoot everyone.
Once they were identified, they were released. Yes, the news crew was there, but the lady was just yelling incoherent sentences at everyone. Hell, even one of the cameramen was detained.
You really are a dumb ass. I'll stick to the actual video evidence rather than a post by "OrangePopcorn".
Hey Dumbass - here's the full clip as posted by that Fox affiliate. It shows it all. No editing. It's your sources that have twisted the facts for their purposes! If you clicked through the links IN the RS story, you would have arrived at the original vid.
Took all of 5 seconds to find a countering opinion, and right on the RS website too.
***
OrangePopcorn 16 minutes ago
That part of the story was irrelevant. I was watching it live on Fox News.
I donât normally blindly support police actions, but when they came on scene, this family had their guns out.
The police had NO WAY to know who was who so they did what protocol dictates. Detain the potential threat, identify everyone. They didnât know if they were good guys or bad guys. Plus... they had guns in California. Theyâre lucky the cops didnât overreact and shoot everyone.
Once they were identified, they were released. Yes, the news crew was there, but the lady was just yelling incoherent sentences at everyone. Hell, even one of the cameramen was detained.
You really are a dumb ass. I'll stick to the actual video evidence rather than a post by "OrangePopcorn".
Whatever fits your narrative! Be aware that this individual is stating a news crew was there.
***
"Monet, the woman who was cuffed, told a Fox News local affiliate that she was surprised when the police put restraints on her, her husband and her brother-in-law, especially because the local reporter, Christina Gonzalez, who helped flag down the police, kept yelling to them that they had the wrong people."
âI was handcuffed, thrown up against a wall with my husband and brother-in-law, and Iâm like, âWhat the hell?'â she said. âThe news people are here and telling you itâs not her, sheâs trying to stop the situation.â
***
Prepare to have the facts handed to you on a silver platter - and ignore them again.
Took all of 5 seconds to find a countering opinion, and right on the RS website too.
***
OrangePopcorn 16 minutes ago
That part of the story was irrelevant. I was watching it live on Fox News.
I donât normally blindly support police actions, but when they came on scene, this family had their guns out.
The police had NO WAY to know who was who so they did what protocol dictates. Detain the potential threat, identify everyone. They didnât know if they were good guys or bad guys. Plus... they had guns in California. Theyâre lucky the cops didnât overreact and shoot everyone.
Once they were identified, they were released. Yes, the news crew was there, but the lady was just yelling incoherent sentences at everyone. Hell, even one of the cameramen was detained.
