Things You Thought Today
- R_P - Jul 23, 2024 - 10:42am
Kamala Harris
- rgio - Jul 23, 2024 - 10:34am
Israel
- R_P - Jul 23, 2024 - 10:15am
Joe Biden
- Steely_D - Jul 23, 2024 - 10:09am
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Jul 23, 2024 - 10:04am
New Music
- Proclivities - Jul 23, 2024 - 8:49am
Poetry Forum
- Isabeau - Jul 23, 2024 - 8:18am
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - Jul 23, 2024 - 8:10am
The Obituary Page
- GeneP59 - Jul 23, 2024 - 8:07am
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Jul 23, 2024 - 8:03am
NYTimes Connections
- Bill_J - Jul 23, 2024 - 7:59am
Wordle - daily game
- ptooey - Jul 23, 2024 - 7:39am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- Red_Dragon - Jul 22, 2024 - 7:21pm
Sampled
- R_P - Jul 22, 2024 - 6:51pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- Beaker - Jul 22, 2024 - 6:02pm
Live Music
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 4:29pm
July 2024 Photo Theme - Summer
- fractalv - Jul 22, 2024 - 4:23pm
• • • What Makes You Happy? • • •
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 4:04pm
Kamala Harris
- kurtster - Jul 22, 2024 - 4:02pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Jul 22, 2024 - 3:52pm
Europe
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 3:48pm
Play the Blues
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 3:25pm
Song of the Day
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 3:21pm
BRING OUT YOUR DEAD
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 3:05pm
Got my Goat
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 3:02pm
Best wishes
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 2:20pm
Trump
- Steely_D - Jul 22, 2024 - 12:44pm
What makes you smile?
- oldviolin - Jul 22, 2024 - 12:26pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jul 22, 2024 - 11:17am
2024 Elections!
- Steely_D - Jul 22, 2024 - 11:15am
Message To Lucky
- oldviolin - Jul 22, 2024 - 11:12am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Jul 22, 2024 - 2:22am
Mixtape Culture Club
- Isabeau - Jul 21, 2024 - 4:11pm
Jon Stewart interview
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 21, 2024 - 3:08pm
Acoustic Guitar
- oldviolin - Jul 21, 2024 - 1:44pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jul 21, 2024 - 1:21pm
Gardeners Photos
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 21, 2024 - 7:39am
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 21, 2024 - 7:36am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Johns2 - Jul 20, 2024 - 10:00pm
The Human Condition
- oldviolin - Jul 20, 2024 - 7:44pm
Banksy!
- R_P - Jul 20, 2024 - 5:16pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- oldviolin - Jul 20, 2024 - 5:05pm
Republican Party
- thisbody - Jul 20, 2024 - 3:58pm
Project 2025
- Isabeau - Jul 20, 2024 - 11:45am
RightWingNutZ
- rgio - Jul 20, 2024 - 10:39am
COVID-19
- Isabeau - Jul 20, 2024 - 6:40am
Climate Change
- Isabeau - Jul 20, 2024 - 6:39am
Gotta Get Your Drink On
- Steely_D - Jul 19, 2024 - 8:42pm
favorite love songs
- oldviolin - Jul 19, 2024 - 7:38pm
The Republican Convention
- Red_Dragon - Jul 19, 2024 - 6:37pm
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- oldviolin - Jul 19, 2024 - 4:50pm
Russia
- R_P - Jul 19, 2024 - 2:49pm
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- sunybuny - Jul 19, 2024 - 7:02am
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Jul 18, 2024 - 8:43pm
Living in America
- black321 - Jul 18, 2024 - 8:14pm
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today...
- oldviolin - Jul 18, 2024 - 10:28am
kurtster's quiet vinyl
- kurtster - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:45pm
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - Jul 17, 2024 - 2:04pm
Best Song Comments.
- q4Fry - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:32am
Rhetorical questions
- sunybuny - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:29am
What questions would you like to answer for the world?
- oldviolin - Jul 16, 2024 - 5:43pm
Democratic Party
- Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 4:48pm
Race in America
- Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:53pm
Guns
- Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:43pm
Gimmie 5 Kurt!
- thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 12:30pm
China
- thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 12:05pm
Bear!
- Beaker - Jul 16, 2024 - 6:43am
Favorite Quotes
- Isabeau - Jul 15, 2024 - 3:43pm
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year
- Isabeau - Jul 15, 2024 - 12:25pm
The Truth About (Modern) Popular Music
- Proclivities - Jul 15, 2024 - 8:18am
Please don't ban me, but: Taylor Swift...
- sunybuny - Jul 15, 2024 - 4:55am
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - Jul 14, 2024 - 12:52pm
Media Bias
- Beaker - Jul 14, 2024 - 9:46am
what the hell, miamizsun?
- oldviolin - Jul 14, 2024 - 7:51am
AH! There's an elephant in the room!
- Red_Dragon - Jul 13, 2024 - 3:42pm
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
USA/Canada »
Sex
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 164, 165, 166 Next |
winter
![winter Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/27907-1379983916.jpg)
Location: in exile, as always Gender: ![Male](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_male.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 9:45am |
|
oldslabsides wrote: Depends on your local laws, I think.
What if he doesn't use adult diapers? Not sexually, anyway.
|
|
Zep
![Zep Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/31960-1644428580.jpg)
Location: Funkytown ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 9:44am |
|
hippiechick wrote:People this is sex ..... You may feel like you're getting fucked, but there is definitely a difference My corp firewall is blocking those, and for that, perhaps I should feel grateful.
|
|
Red_Dragon
![Red_Dragon Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/18168-1646400561.png)
Location: Dumbf*ckistan ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 9:42am |
|
winter wrote: Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?
Depends on your local laws, I think.
|
|
sirdroseph
![sirdroseph Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/78797-1637776963.png)
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender: ![Male](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_male.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 9:41am |
|
winter wrote: Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?
As your attorney I advise you, yes.
|
|
winter
![winter Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/27907-1379983916.jpg)
Location: in exile, as always Gender: ![Male](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_male.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 9:33am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:
Quite.
Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?
|
|
sirdroseph
![sirdroseph Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/78797-1637776963.png)
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender: ![Male](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_male.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 9:30am |
|
|
|
winter
![winter Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/27907-1379983916.jpg)
Location: in exile, as always Gender: ![Male](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_male.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 9:27am |
|
oldslabsides wrote:
indeed.
Yes.
|
|
Red_Dragon
![Red_Dragon Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/18168-1646400561.png)
Location: Dumbf*ckistan ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 9:26am |
|
winter wrote: Tax policy is weird.
indeed.
|
|
winter
![winter Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/27907-1379983916.jpg)
Location: in exile, as always Gender: ![Male](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_male.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 9:22am |
|
Lazy8 wrote: oldslabsides wrote:Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed. It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
It goes the other way too: a two-earner household can pay higher rates married than single because they get bumped to a higher bracket (the "marriage penalty"). With one earner making substantially more than the other it works the other way.
Tax policy is weird.
|
|
hippiechick
![hippiechick Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/29866.png)
Location: topsy turvy land Gender: ![Female](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_female.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:41am |
|
People this is sex ![](http://www.sexualhealthcare.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/39-SEX.jpg) This is not ![](http://www.apfn.org/apfn/TaxReady.jpg) You may feel like you're getting fucked, but there is definitely a difference
|
|
Lazy8
![Lazy8 Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/23094.jpg)
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender: ![Male](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_male.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:37am |
|
oldslabsides wrote:Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed. It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
It goes the other way too: a two-earner household can pay higher rates married than single because they get bumped to a higher bracket (the "marriage penalty"). With one earner making substantially more than the other it works the other way.
|
|
hippiechick
![hippiechick Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/29866.png)
Location: topsy turvy land Gender: ![Female](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_female.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:34am |
|
oldslabsides wrote: Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed. It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
If you want to talk taxes, go find another thread. Marriage has nothing to do with sex (all too often, unfortunately). But I think someone here doesn't know that.
|
|
Red_Dragon
![Red_Dragon Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/18168-1646400561.png)
Location: Dumbf*ckistan ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:30am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:According to the GOP, that time is now. ![{#Rolleyes} {#Rolleyes}](scripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/icon_rolleyes.gif) Well, some people...
|
|
sirdroseph
![sirdroseph Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/78797-1637776963.png)
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender: ![Male](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_male.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:29am |
|
oldslabsides wrote: Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed. It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
According to the GOP, that time is now.
|
|
Red_Dragon
![Red_Dragon Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/18168-1646400561.png)
Location: Dumbf*ckistan ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:26am |
|
rosedraws wrote: Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years. They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper. But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple. Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.
Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage? What's in it for them?
Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed. It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
|
|
Alexandra
![Alexandra Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/1716-1426688461.jpg)
Location: PNW Gender: ![Female](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_female.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:15am |
|
rosedraws wrote: Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years. They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper. But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple. Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.
Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage? What's in it for them?
Maybe the conservatives (who are religious) feel better about people not living in "sin?" ![{#Ask} {#Ask}](scripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/icon_ask.gif) Good question.
|
|
rosedraws
![rosedraws Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/40969.gif)
Location: close to the edge Gender: ![Female](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_female.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:13am |
|
Alexandra wrote:
I often think to myself that some people should just live together and quit making it legal. All they do is make attorneys rich. I also think (and I know this sounds horrible) that if people do have marriages, there can be renewal period every 5 years to stay or go without any legals becoming involved. That is just the nature of marriage these days...many people settle/choose too quickly....or a partner changes drastically on them...or worse things....and then find that they really don't want to have to pay for the mistake with the rest of their lives. If the "for life" stigma/burden is removed, maybe it would be easier for people to decide to find happiness.
/2 cents
Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years. They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper. But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple. Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year. Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage? What's in it for them?
|
|
Alexandra
![Alexandra Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/1716-1426688461.jpg)
Location: PNW Gender: ![Female](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_female.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:13am |
|
buzz wrote: maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.
I agree, but shit does happen sometimes, even if they do. I dodged two bullets in the past. If I'd married them, I'd probably be divorced now. It really does pay (literally) to be picky.
|
|
oldviolin
![oldviolin Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/43780-1719705476.jpg)
Location: esse quam videri Gender: ![Male](graphics/icons/icon_minigender_male.gif) ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:12am |
|
buzz wrote: maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.
Thanks. I'll remember that next time around.
|
|
buzz
![buzz Avatar](https://img.radioparadise.com/avatars/2004-1393221076.gif)
Location: up the boohai ![](graphics/clear.gif)
|
Posted:
Jul 12, 2011 - 8:11am |
|
Alexandra wrote:
I often think to myself that some people should just live together and quit making it legal. All they do is make attorneys rich. I also think (and I know this sounds horrible) that if people do have marriages, there can be renewal period every 5 years to stay or go without any legals becoming involved. That is just the nature of marriage these days...many people settle/choose too quickly....or a partner changes drastically on them...or worse things....and then find that they really don't want to have to pay for the mistake with the rest of their lives. If the "for life" stigma/burden is removed, maybe it would be easier for people to decide to find happiness.
/2 cents
maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.
|
|
|