Isabeau wrote: 
Add some tats and she could be Cookinlover's high school sweetheart... Never been kissed? Ha.

Isabeau wrote:

 triskele wrote: 
I totally agree.  She is still herself, but now with the right touch of class ... befitting her. 

i think she looks fabulous after her make over. 

 hippiechick wrote: 
Oh yea, the eyeliner!  I'm finally moved in my new place (much better - and sunnier, than the old!) new kitteh very happy too with trees and birds to eyeball from the deck. Still job hunting....  How are YOU doing? (pm!)  

Srsly, I love this gal because she represents the underdog "surprise" that all of us hanker for - as in the ugly duckling and Cinderella stories.

 Isabeau wrote: 
Amy Winehouse in 20 yrs (if she lives that long)

Don't forget the eyeliner!

How you doin, Girl?

 ScottFromWyoming wrote: 
Add some tats and she and Winehouse could do a tour 

 hippiechick wrote: 
I guess she's been trying out a few "looks"...

 Painted_Turtle wrote:

The new improved Susan Boyle

The Backlash Tracker: Build 'Em Up, Knock 'Em Down, NEXT!

In the third stage, acclaim soars right up to the Cat Calendar Tolerance Level. This is the mass-public equivalent of the limited number of times an individual can look at the same picture in a cat calendar before being sorely tempted to rip it off the wall. There is only so much adorability a person wishes to see, and when something soars to this level, everything changes.

in an interview last night she said she has no plans to get a makeover or alter her wardrobe — "Why should I? Why should I change?" — but did predict one big lifestyle change.

"I won't be lonely," she said. "I certainly won't be lonely anymore."

 zipper wrote: 
amazing talent...How do we get her hooked up with the tenor?

Painted_Turtle wrote:
amazing, wonderful voice

 ptooey wrote: 
Her beginning verses have a Billie Holiday quality to them...soul full inflections

 MrsHobieJoe wrote: 
She reminds me of those female singers from the 40s and 50s like Rosemary Clooney.

 manbirdexperiment wrote: 
Ahh...it's semantics, then.  I'd interpreted it as being we were required to keep the minimum amount of letters and still imply actual profanity.  My f*ckin' bad, man.

 ptooey wrote: 
you're below the minimum. come on, pick up the slack a little. dammit.

 manbirdexperiment wrote: 
I thought I had. 

 zipper wrote: 
featuring Jim Broadbent as Mr. Boo

 ScottFromWyoming wrote: 
It DOES.